Skip to main content

Implementing Innovation: A Graded Approach to English Language Testing in Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter outlines the key components of the ‘graded approach’ employed in two papers of the new Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (HKDSE) English Language examination and places the development of the new qualification in the context of recent educational policy changes. The HKDSE was implemented in 2012 and is taken by students in Form 6 (Grade 12), after 6 years of secondary education. It replaces two qualifications, the HKCEE and the HKALE, which were previously offered after Form 5 (Grade 11) and Form 7 (Grade 13), respectively. The HKDSE English Language has to cater for the wide range of candidate abilities previously covered by the two separate examinations. The response to this challenge has been to design an innovative graded approach in which examination papers contain optional parts of different levels of difficulty. This chapter traces the historical development of the HKDSE English Language examination and discusses the challenges of implementing the graded approach for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baird, J. A., Fearnley, A., Fowles, D., Jones, B., Morfidi, E., & White, D. (2001). Tiering in the GCSE: A study undertaken by AQA on behalf of the Joint Council for General Qualifications. London: Joint Council for General Qualifications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghes, D., Roddick, M., & Tapson, F. (2001). Tiering at GCSE: Is there a fairer system? Educational Research, 43(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, C. C., & Lee, C. (2009). Developments of English language assessment in public examinations in Hong Kong. In L. Y. Cheng & A. Curtis (Eds.), English language assessment and the Chinese learner. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J. (1996). Standard-setting guidelines. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council & HKEAA. (2007). English language curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divgi, D. R. (1988). A comparison of linear and equipercentile test equating procedures in large samples. Research memorandum. Alexandria: Center for Naval Analyses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorans, N. J., Moses, T. P., & Eignor, D. R. (2010). Principles and practices of test score equating (ETS Research Report, 10–29). Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-10-29.pdf

  • Education Commission. (2000). Education blueprint for the 21st century: Learning for life, learning through life – Reform proposals for education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., Broadfoot, P., Cheung, D., et al. (1998). Review of public examination system in Hong Kong: Final report. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Baptist University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, F. J., & Cresswell, M. J. (1988). Can teachers enter candidates appropriately for examinations including differentiated papers? Educational Studies, 14, 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., & Wan, T. W. (2006). Assessment reforms in Hong Kong. Paper presented at the 32nd IAEA conference, Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.iaea.info/documents/paper_1162a2725.pdf

  • Holland, P. W., & Dorans, N. J. (2006). Linking and equating. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 187–220). Westport: ACE/Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (1994). Historical survey of English language testing in Hong Kong. In J. Boyle & P. Falvey (Eds.), English language testing in Hong Kong (pp. 3–30). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolen, M. J. (2006). Scaling and norming. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 155–186). Westport: ACE/Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. (2005). English syllabus A students in limbo. Varsity Online Edition. Retrieved from http://www.com.cuhk.edu.hk/varsity/0512/our_community2.htm

  • Ofqual. (2013). Annex 4 – Technical paper on tiering. Retrieved from http://www.ofqual.gov.uk/files/2013-06-11-annex-4-technical-paper-on-tiering.pdf

  • Poon, A. Y. K. (2004). Language policy of Hong Kong: Its impact on language education and language use in post-handover Hong Kong. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanity and Social Sciences, 49(1), 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, T. (2009). Investigating different item response models in equating the Examination for the Certificate of Proficiency in English (ECPE). Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 7, 85–98. Ann Arbor: English Language Institute University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgemichigan.org/sites/default/files/resources/SpaanPapers/Spaan_V7_Song.pdf

  • Sweeting, A. (1990). Education in Hong Kong pre-1841 to 1941. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheadon, C., & Beguin, A. (2010). Fears for tiers: Are candidates being appropriately rewarded for their performance in tiered examinations? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(3), 280–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (1995). It’ll all end in tiers! British Journal of Curriculum Assessment, 5(3), 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Smart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Conversion Table Between the Easier Section and More Difficult Section of Papers 1B and 3B (2012)

Appendix 1: Conversion Table Between the Easier Section and More Difficult Section of Papers 1B and 3B (2012)

1.1 Paper 1B

1B1 (easier)

1B2 (more difficult)

0

0

1

1

2

2

3

2

4

3

5

4

6

4

7

5

8

5

9

6

10

6

11

7

12

8

13

8

14

9

15

10

16

11

17

12

18

13

19

14

20

15

21

16

22

18

23

19

24

20

25

21

26

22

27

24

28

25

29

26

30

27

31

29

32

30

33

31

34

32

35

34

36

35

37

36

38

38

39

39

40

40

41

42

42

43

43

45

1.2 Paper 3B

3B1 (easier)

3B2 (more difficult)

0

0

1

0

2

1

3

1

4

1

5

1

6

2

7

2

8

2

9

2

10

3

11

3

12

3

13

4

14

4

15

4

16

4

17

5

18

5

19

5

20

6

21

6

22

7

23

8

24

8

25

9

26

10

27

11

28

12

29

14

30

15

31

16

32

18

33

19

34

21

35

22

36

23

37

25

38

26

39

28

40

29

41

31

42

32

43

34

44

36

45

39

46

42

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smart, C., Drave, N., Shiu, J. (2014). Implementing Innovation: A Graded Approach to English Language Testing in Hong Kong. In: Coniam, D. (eds) English Language Education and Assessment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-071-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics