Skip to main content

Abstract

Supply chain integration (SCI) has been an important management practice for the firm’s competitive advantages in the recent decades. Firms aim to integrate supply chain activities not only across functional departments but also cross organizational boundaries. In this book, we present a number of studies which investigate the antecedents and outcomes of SCI. Data from the sixth round International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS) project were used to empirically test the research models. The data set is introduced in detail, including its distribution, reliability, validity and measurement equivalence. This book is intended for contributing to the theory and practice about SCI.

This chapter is co-authored by Mingu Kang, Young Won Park and Yongyi Shou.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelkafi, N., Pero, M., Blecker, T., & Sianesi, A. (2011). NPD-SCM alignment in mass customization. In F. Fogliatto & G. da Silveira (Eds.), Mass customization. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-489-0_4

  • Al-Mudimigh, A. S., Zairi, M., & Ahmed, A. M. M. (2004). Extending the concept of supply chain: The effective management of value chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidhandi, H. M., Yusuff, R. M., Ahmad, M. M. H. M., & Bakar, M. R. A. (2009). Development of a new approach for deterministic supply chain network design. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(1), 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (1999). 21st century logistics: Making supply chain integration a reality. Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, K. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2002). Competitive priorities: Investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calle, A. D. L., Alvarez, E., & Freije, I. (2015). Supply chain integration, a key strategic capability for improving product and service value propositions: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Engineering Management and Economics, 5(1–2), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeter, K., Szász, L., & Rácz, B.-G. (2016). The impact of subsidiaries’ internal and external integration on operational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegaard, C., & Koch, C. (2012). The effects of low internal integration between purchasing and operations on suppliers’ resource mobilization. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(3), 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (2004). An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Keung Lai, K., Sun, H., & Chen, Y. (2014). The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W., Shou, Y., Kang, M., & Park, Y. (2020). Risk management of manufacturing multinational corporations: The moderating effects of international asset dispersion and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M.-C., Yen, G.-F., & Liu, T.-C. (2014). Reexamining supply chain integration and the supplier’s performance relationships under uncertainty. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, R. Y. Y., Yang, B., Lien, B.Y.-H., Mclean, G. N., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2010). Dynamic capability: Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, B., Zhao, X., & Lai, F. (2013). Supply chain quality integration: Antecedents and consequences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(1), 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, F., & Rutherford, C. (2010). Mitigation of supply chain relational risk caused by cultural differences between China and the west. International Journal of Logistics Management., 21(2), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M., Yang, M. G., Park, Y., & Huo, B. (2018). Supply chain integration and its impact on sustainability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(9), 1749–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, K., Longoni, A., Caniato, F., & Kuula, M. (2016). Managing country disruption risks and improving operational performance: Risk management along integrated supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, T., Wiengarten, F., Power, D., & Shah, P. (2019). Acting as expected: Global leadership preferences and the pursuit of an integrated supply chain. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(3), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, F., Zhang, M., Lee, D. M. S., & Zhao, X. (2012). The impact of supply chain integration on mass customization capability: An extended resource-based view. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(3), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-H., & Kim, C.-O. (2008). Multi-agent systems applications in manufacturing systems and supply chain management: A review paper. International Journal of Production Research, 46(1), 233–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. Y., & Ho, Y. H. (2009). RFID technology adoption and supply chain performance: An empirical study in China’s logistics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(5), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, M. R. (1995). Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., & Hong, P. (2017). Reshoring strategy: Case illustrations of Japanese manufacturing firms. In A. Vecchi (Ed.), Reshoring of Manufacturing. Measuring Operations Performance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58883-4_7

  • Park, Y., Ogawa, K., Tatsumoto, H., & Hong, P. (2009). The impact of product architecture on supply chain integration: A case study of Nokia and Texas Instruments. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 5(6), 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Oh, J., & Fujimoto, T. (2012). Global expansion and supply chain integration: Case study of Korean firms. International Journal of Procurement Management, 5(4), 470–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. W., & Hong, P. (2019). Building network capabilities in turbulent competitive environments: Practices of global firms from Korea and Japan. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. W., Shintaku, J., & Hong, P. (2015). Effective supply chain integration: Case studies for Korean global firms in China. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 29(3–4), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rungtusanatham, M., Ng, C. H., Zhao, X., & Lee, T. S. (2008). Pooling data across transparently different groups of key informants: Measurement equivalence and survey research. Decision Sciences, 39(1), 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shou, Y., Li, Y., Park, Y., & Kang, M. (2017). The impact of product complexity and variety on supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(4), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shou, Y., Li, Y., Park, Y., & Kang, M. (2018). Supply chain integration and operational performance: The contingency effects of production systems. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(4), 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., & Swink, M. (2015). Leveraging supply chain integration through planning comprehensiveness: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Decision Sciences, 46(5), 823–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarifa-Fernandez, J., & De Burgos-Jiménez, J. (2017). Supply chain integration and performance relationship: A moderating effects review. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1243–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, M., Huo, B., Park, Y., & Kang, M. (2021). Enablers of supply chain integration: A technology-organization-environment view. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(8), 1871–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Kemmerling, R. (2010). Handling nonresponse in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(2), 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B. B., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011). The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongyi Shou .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shou, Y., Kang, M., Park, Y.W. (2022). Introduction. In: Supply Chain Integration for Sustainable Advantages. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9332-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics