Skip to main content

Mental Imagery for Multisensory Designers: Insights for Non-visual Design Cognition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design for Tomorrow—Volume 1 (ICoRD 2021)

Abstract

How do people with visual impairment see the world? In this literature review based on cognitive sciences findings, we have analyzed the main concepts used in the human brain’s cognitive processes to represent our perception of the surrounding environment. One of these concepts is mental imagery, which resembles perceptual experience without external sensory stimulation. This concept plays a central role in multisensory design cognition. It can help us understand the designer’s cognition process, design better systems for people with disabilities, and open opportunities for multisensory design teams.

There’s plenty of imagery that goes on all the time in blind people. It just isn’t visual.

Paul Gabias, Associate Professor, University of British Columbia, early blind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A.A., Gulliksen, J.: Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(4), 505–526 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luck, R.: Inclusive design and making in practice: bringing bodily experience into closer contact with making. Des. Stud. 54, 96–119 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UN Disability Laws and Acts by Country/Area Homepage. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/disability-laws-and-acts-by-country-area.html. Last Accessed 21 April 2020

  4. Manduchi, R., Kurniawan, S. (eds.).: Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision. CRC Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gero, J.S.: Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 64(2–3), 183–196 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Horton, E.L., Renganathan, R., Toth, B.N., Cohen, A.J., Bajcsy, A.V., Bateman, A., Lim, M.K.: A review of principles in design and usability testing of tactile technology for individuals with visual impairments. Assist. Technol. 29(1), 28–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhowmick, A., Hazarika, S.M.: An insight into assistive technology for the visually impaired and blind people: state-of-the-art and future trends. J. Multimod. User Interf. 11(2), 149–172 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bilda, Z., Gero, J.S., Purcell, T.: To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Stud. 27(5), 587–613 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cattaneo, Z., Vecchi, T. Blind Vision: the Neuroscience of Visual Impairment. MIT Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warren, D.H.: Perception by the blind. Percep. Ecol. 10, 65 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ackland, P., Resnikoff, S., Bourne, R.: World blindness and visual impairment: despite many successes, the problem is growing. Community Eye Health 30(100), 71 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hollins, M.: Understanding Blindness: An Integrative Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. Blindness and vision impairment. Homepage https://www.who.int/health-topics/blindness-and-vision-loss#tab=tab_1. Last Accessed 14 June 2020

  14. Nieusma, D.: Alternative design scholarship: Working toward appropriate design. Design Issues 20(3), 13–24 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pullin, G.: Design Meets Disability. MIT Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schiffman, H.R.: Sensation and Perception: an Integrated Approach. Wiley (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sternberg, R.J., Sternberg, K.:Cognitive psychology. Nelson Education (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gibson, J.J.: The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bremner, A.J., Lewkowicz, D.J., Spence, C.: The Multisensory Approach to Development (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Braun, A.: The sensory compensation hypothesis. In: The Speaker Identification Ability of Blind and Sighted Listeners, pp. 27–29. Springer VS, Wiesb (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Love, T.: Design as a social process: bodies, brains, and social aspects of designing. J. Design Res. 3(1), 45–54 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spence, C., Gallace, A.: Multisensory design: reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychol. Market. 28(3), 267–308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A.A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., Keysers, C.: Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends Cognit. Sci. 16(2), 114–121 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Viinikainen, M., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Hari, R., Sams, M.: Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(24), 9599–9604 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T.: Analysis of cognitive processes of a designer as the foundation for support tools. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘98, pp. 229–247. Springer, Dordrecht. (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, N.J.: Mental imagery, philosophical issues about. In: Nadel, L. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, pp. 1147–1153. Nature Publishing/Macmillan, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mellet, E., Petit, L., Mazoyer, B., Denis, M., Tzourio, N.: Reopening the mental imagery debate: lessons from functional anatomy. Neuroimage 8(2), 129–139 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E.A., Kosslyn, S.M.: Mental imagery: functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends Cognit. Sci. 19(10), 590–602 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt, T.T., Ostwald, D., Blankenburg, F.: Imaging tactile imagery: changes in brain connectivity support perceptual grounding of mental images in primary sensory cortices. Neuroimage 98, 216–224 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reisberg, D. (ed.).: Auditory Imagery. Psychology Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stevenson, R.J., Case, T.I.: Olfactory imagery: a review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12(2), 244–264 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guillot, A., Collet, C.: Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Res. Rev. 50(2), 387–397 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kosslyn, S.M., Ganis, G., Thompson, W.L.: Neural foundations of imagery. Nauru Rev. Neurosci. 2(9), 635–642 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blazhenkova, O., Kozhevnikov. M.: Visual-object ability: a new dimension of non-verbal intelligence. Cognition 117, 276–301 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gallace, A.: Somesthetic mental imagery. In: Multisensory Imagery, pp. 29–50. Springer, New York, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bensafi, M., Tillmann, B., Poncelet, J., Przybylski, L., Rouby, C.: Olfactory and gustatory mental imagery: modulation by sensory experience and comparison to auditory mental imagery. In: Multisensory Imagery, pp. 77–91. Springer, New York, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jeannerod, M., Frak, V.: Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9(6), 735–739 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Moran, A., O’Shea, H.: Motor imagery practice and cognitive processes. Front. Psychol. 11, 394 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H.D.: Imagery and action: differential encoding of verbs and nouns (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Andrea Kamensky and Marcio Aveiro, organizers of the course “Accessibility and Technology”, offered by Digital Plural, a social learning network platform, with the financial support from PROEC/UFABC. This research received financial support from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Pereira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maciel, I.M., Felicio, G., da Silva, E.T., Villani, E., Krus, P., Pereira, L. (2021). Mental Imagery for Multisensory Designers: Insights for Non-visual Design Cognition. In: Chakrabarti, A., Poovaiah, R., Bokil, P., Kant, V. (eds) Design for Tomorrow—Volume 1. ICoRD 2021. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 221. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0041-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0041-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0040-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0041-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics