Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vocal Preferences in Humans: A Systematic Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Voice Attractiveness

Part of the book series: Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics ((PRPHPH))

Abstract

Surprisingly, the study of human voice evolution has long been conducted without any reference to its biological function. Yet, following Darwin’s original concept, John Ohala was the first linguist to assume the functional role of sexual selection to explain vocal dimorphism in humans. Nevertheless, it is only at the very beginning of the millennial that the study of voice attractiveness developed, revealing that beyond its linguistic role, voice also conveys important psycho-socio-biological information that have a significant effect on the speaker’s mating and reproductive success. In this review article, our aim is to synthesize 20 years of research dedicated to the study of vocal preferences and to present the evolutionary benefits associated with such preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Runaway selection is a mechanism whereby a secondary sexual trait expressed in one sex is correlated with a preference for the trait in the other sex. The genetic coupling of the trait and the preference leads to self-reinforcing loops of coevolution between the trait and preference for the trait (Travers, 2017).

  2. 2.

    The WHR has been used as an indicator of health and the risk of developing serious health conditions. WHR correlates with fertility (with different optimal values in males and females). The concept and significance of WHR as an indicator of attractiveness has been theorized by Singh (1993) who argued the WHR is a consistent estrogen marker, and thus a reliable proxy of fertility. Women with a 0.7 WHR are usually rated as more attractive by men from Indo-European cultures (Singh & Young 2001), but preferences may vary according to the culture under study (Fisher & Voracek, 2006).

  3. 3.

    At the physiological level, low HNR values are believed to be related to insufficient vocal fold adduction during the so-called “closed” interval of the phonatory cycle. Insufficient closure would allow excessive airflow through the glottis, giving rise to a turbulence noise component in the quasi-periodic source signal. This friction noise would result in a higher noise level in the spectrum, especially in the higher frequencies.

  4. 4.

    The theory of immunocompetence handicap (Zahavi, 1975) suggests that androgen-mediated traits accurately signal condition due to the immunosuppressive effects of androgens. This immunosuppression may be either because testosterone alters the allocation of limited resources between the development of ornamental traits and the immune system or because heightened immune system activity has a propensity to launch autoimmune attacks against gametes, such that suppression of the immune system enhances fertility. Therefore, only healthy individuals can afford to suppress their immune system by raising their testosterone levels, which also augments secondary sexual traits and displays (among which low deep voices for men).

  5. 5.

    Secondary sex characteristics are features that appear during puberty in humans, and at sexual maturity in other animals. Secondary sex characteristics include, for example, the manes of male lions, the bright facial and rump coloration of male mandrills, and horns in many goats and/or antelopes. In humans, visible secondary sex characteristics include pubic hair, enlarged breasts and widened hips of females, facial hair, Adam’s apples on males, etc.

  6. 6.

    In a famous article dealing with vocal communication in animals, Morton (1977) introduces his ‘motivation-structural rules’ theory, which suggests physical proprieties of acoustic signals (sounds of high versus low frequencies) are motivated since they reflect the vocalizer’s body size and inform about his/her intentions and/or emotional state. He argues a large number of birds and mammals use low-frequency sounds to express hostility, threat, and aggression whereas high-frequency sounds are rather used to express fear, submission, and “amicability.”.

References

  • Aben, P., Pflügera, L., Koppensteiner, M., Coquerellee, M., & Grammer, K. (2015). Sound of female shape: A redundant signal of vocal and facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abitbol, J., Abitbol, P., & Abitbol, B. (1999). Sex hormones and the female voice. Journal of Voice, 13, 424–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, O., & Biron-Shental, T. (2003). The impact of hormonal fluctuations on female vocal folds. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 12, 180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biology Letters, 3(6), 682–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arak, A., & Enquist, M. (1993). Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 340, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, J. D., & Liss, J. M. (1996). Acoustic characteristics of less masculine-sounding male speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3738–3748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babel, M., McGuire, G., & King, J. (2014). Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness. PLoS One, 9(2), e88616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J. (2005). The endocrinology of sexual arousal. Journal of Endocrinology, 186, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkat-Defradas, M., Busseuil, C., Chauvy, O., Hirsch, F., Fauth, C., Revis, J., & Amy de la Bretéque, B. (2012). Dimension esthétique des voix normales et dysphoniques: Approches perceptive et acoustique. TIPA 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkat-Defradas, M., Fauth, C., Didirkova, F., Amy de la Breteque, B., Hirsch, F., Dodane, C., & Sauvage, J. (2015). Dysphonia is beautiful: A perceptual and acoustic analysis of vocal roughness. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 18th ICPhS, Glasgow 10–14 August 2015, Scotland, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowska, B., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female voice frequency in the context of dominance and attractiveness perception. Animal Behaviour, 82(1), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, J. (2018). The evolution of feminine beauty. In Z. Kapoula et al. (Eds.), Exploring Trans disciplinarity in Art and Sciences (pp. 327–348). Springer International Publishing AG, Part of Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, J. (2019). Evolutionary theories and men’s preferences for women’s waist-to-hip ratio: Which hypotheses remain? A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01221.

  • Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2015). Preferred women’s waist-to-hip ratio variation over the last 2, 500 years. PLoS One, 10, e0123284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckert, L., Bestelmeyer, P., Latinus, M., Rouger, J., Charest, I., Rousselet, G. A., et al. (2010). Vocal attractiveness increases by averaging. Current Biology, 20(2), 116–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckert, L., Lienard, J.-S., Lacroix, A., Kreutzer, M., & Leboucher, G. (2006). Women use voice parameters to assess men’s characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1582), 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Gregory A., & Haselton, Martie G. (2009). Vocal cues of ovulation in human females. Biology Letters, 5, 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonnier, G. (1959). Entretiens avec Claude Levi-Strauss. https://www.jpbu.com/philo/.../Levi-Strauss_Charbonnier_Culture-langage.rtf.

  • Chomsky, A. N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60(6), 773–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. A., & Missing, C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 65(5), 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R., Duncan, N., & Nettle, D. (1995). Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups. Human nature, 6(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S., Neave, N., Wakelin, D., & Hamilton, C. (2008). The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiology and Behavior, 93, 783–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, G. (1960). Voice and articulation. J. Cotler Books, 2nd revised edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Little, A. C. (2008a). Correlated preferences for men’s facial and vocal masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008b). The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception, 37(4), 615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Moore, F. R., Law Smith, M. J., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2005). The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., et al. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49(2), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., Semple, S., Fickenscher, G., Jürgens, R., Kruse, E., Heistermann, M., et al. (2011). Do women’s voices provide cues of the likelihood of ovulation? The importance of sampling regime. PLoS One, 6(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. (2000). The relation between gender and emotions in different cultures. Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives, 1, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L., & Voracek, M. (2006). The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 5(2), 190–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T., & Reby, D. (2001). The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1477), 1669–1675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T. (1997). Vocal tract length and format frequency dispersion correlated with body size in rhesus macaques. The Journal of the American Society of America, 102, 1213–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T., & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of the American Society of America, 106, 1511–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraccaro, P. J., Jones, B. C., Vukovic, J., Smith, F. G., Watkins, C. D., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2011). Experimental evidence that women speak in a higher voice pitch to men they find attractive. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraccaro, P. J., O’Connor, J. J. M., Re, D. E., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Faking it: Deliberately altered voice pitch and vocal attractiveness. Animal Behaviour, 85(1), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Vigil, J., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of human mate choice. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handson, H. (1997). Glottal characteristics of female speakers: Acoustic correlates. The Journal of the American Society of America, 101(1), 466–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, H. M. (1997). Glottal characteristics of female speakers: Acoustic correlates. The Journal of the American Society of America, 101(1), 466–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. C. (1994). Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: A replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 31, 241–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. B., & Saxman, J. H. (1989). Variations in vocal frequency perturbation across the menstrual cycle. Journal of Voice, 3, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L. M., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Different vocal parameters predict perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Human Nature, 21(4), 406–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, E. B., Hillman, R. E., Perkell, J. S., Guiod, P. C., & Goldman, S. L. (1995). Comparisons among aerodynamic, electroglottographic, andacoustic spectral measures of female voice. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 1212–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Farley, S. D., & Rhodes, B. C. (2010). Vocal and physiological changes in response to the physical attractiveness of conversational partners. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(3), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Mogilski, J. K., & Harrison, M. A. (2014). The perception and parameters of intentional voice manipulation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(1), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Pastizzo, M. J., & Gallup, G. G. (2008). The sound of symmetry revisited: Subjective and objective analyses of voice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Vukovic, J. (2010). A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 79(1), 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., et al. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29(6), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jünger, J., Motta-Mena, N. V., Cardenas, R., Bailey, D., Rosenfield, K. A., Schild, C., et al. (2018). Do women’s preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle? Hormones and Behavior, 106, 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The relative importance of intra- and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrine, H. (1985). Race x class stereotypes of women. Sex Roles, 13, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality, (vol. 2009, 1st edn). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaderbrand, K., Dekam, J., Morey, A., & Tuma, L. (2008). The effects of voice pitch on perceptions of attractiveness: Do you sound hot or not? Winona State University Psychology Student Journal, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léon, P. (1981). BB ou la voix charmeuse, petite fille et coquette. Studia Phonetica, 18, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leongomez, J. D., Binter, J., Kubicova, L., Stolařova, P., Klapilova, K., Havlíček, J., et al. (2014). Vocal modulation during courtship increases proceptivity even in naive listeners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(6), 489–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1963). Some acoustic measures of the fundamental periodicity of normal and pathologic larynges. The Journal of the American Society of America, 35(3), 344–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Xu, Y. (2011). What makes a female voice attractive? In Proceedings of ICPhS. Hong-Kong (pp. 1274–1277).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Galbarczyk, A., & Jasienska, G. (2018). La donna è mobile? Lack of cyclical shifts in facial symmetry, and facial and body masculinity preferences—A hormone based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F., Tybur, J., & Jordan, B. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap-dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus? Evolution and Human Behavior, 6, 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P., & Thomson, C. L. (1965). Comments on physiology of hoarseness. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 81(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1965.00750050102022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, E. S. (1977). On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. The America Naturalist, 111(981), 855–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1996). Human evolution, language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. J. M., Fraccaro, P. J., Pisanski, K., Tigue, C. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Men’s preferences for women’s femininity in dynamic cross-modal stimuli. PLoS One, 8(7), e69531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. J., Re, D. E., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1), 147470491100900109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oguchi, T., & Kikuchi, H. (1997). Voice and interpersonal attraction. Japanese Psychological Research, 39(1), 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross- language utilisation of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipitone, R. N., & Gallup, G. G. (2008). Women’s voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisanski, K., Bhardwaj, K., & Reby, D. (2018). Women’s voice pitch lowers after pregnancy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisanski, K., Fraccaro, P. J., Tigue, C. C., O’Connor, J. J. M., Röder, S., Andrews, P. W., et al. (2014). Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: A meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour, 95, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisanski, K., & Rendall, D. (2011). The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners’ assessments of speaker size, masculinity and attractiveness. The Journal of the American Society of America, 129(4), 2201–2212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., Kilmartin, C. T., Forssmann-Falck, R., & Kliewer, W. (1998). Gender and age patterns in emotional expression, body image, and self-esteem: A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles, 38(11–12), 1025–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Bailey, D. H., Cárdenas, R. A., Burriss, R. P., Welling, L. L. M., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2013). Women’s attractiveness changes with estradiol and progesterone across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 63(1), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Barndt, J. L., Welling, L. L. M., Dawood, K., & Burriss, R. P. (2011). Intrasexual competition among women: Vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renoult, J. P., Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2016). Beauty is in the efficient coding of the beholder. Royal Society Open Science, 3(3), 160027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Re, D. E., O’Connor, J. J. M., Bennett, P. J., & Feinberg, D. R. (2012). Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans. PLoS One, 7(3), e32719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revis, J. (2017). La voix et soi: Ce que notre voix dit de nous. France: Solal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, D., Lonsdale, D., & Brown, B. (2006). The effects of average fundamental frequency and variance of fundamental frequency on male vocal attractiveness to women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30(2), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, T. K., Caryl, P. G., & Craig R. S. (2006). Vocal and facial attractiveness judgments of children, adolescents and adults: The ontogeny of mate choice. Ethology, 112(12), 1179–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, T. K., Debruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2009). Face and voice attractiveness judgments change during adolescence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(6), 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebesta, P., Kleisner, K., Turecek, P., Kočnar, T., Akoko, R. M., Trebicky, V., et al. (2017). Voices of Africa: Acoustic predictors of human male vocal attractiveness. Animal Behaviour, 127, 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, T. N., Puts, D. A., & Escasa-Dorne, M. J. (2018). Filipino women’s preferences for male voice pitch: Intra-individual, life history, and hormonal predictors. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4(2), 188–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. W., Peters, M., & Rhodes, G. (2011). Low pitched voices are perceived as masculine and attractive but do they predict semen quality in men? PLoS One, 6(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (2001). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology., 16(6), 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrinda, I., Krama, T., Kecko, S., Moore, F. R., Kaasik, A., Meija, L., et al. (2014). Body height, immunity, facial and vocal attractiveness in young men. Naturwissenschaften, 101(12), 1017–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Södersten, M., Lindestad, P. A., & Hammarberg, B. (1991). Vocal fold closure, perceived breathiness, and acoustic characteristics in normal adult speakers. In J. Gauffin & B. Hammarberg (Eds.), Vocal fold physiology: Acoustic, perceptual, and physiological aspects of voice mechanisms (pp. 217–224).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sughira, Y., & Katsurada, E. (1999). Masculinity and feminity in Japanese culture. Sex Roles, 40(718), 635–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, L. S. (2015). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292–343). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suire, A., Raymond, M., & Barkat-Defradas, M. (2019). Male vocal quality and its relation to females’ preferences. Evolutionary Psychology, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919874675.

  • Suire, A., Tognetti, A., Durand, V., Raymond, M., & Barkat-Defradas, M. (2020). The influence of sexual orientation and circulating testosterone levels on speech acoustic features. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01665-3.

  • Suire, A., Raymond, M., & Barkat-Defradas, M. (2018). Vocal behavior within competitive and courtship contexts and its relation to mating success in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 684–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titze, I. R. (1994). Principles of voice production. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognetti, A., Durand, V., Barkat-Defradas, M., & Hopfensitz, A. (2019). Does he sound cooperative? Acoustic correlates of cooperativeness. British Journal of Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12437.

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller, H., & Eriksson, A. (1995). The frequency range of the voice fundamental in the speech of male and female adults. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, L. M. (2017). Runaway selection. In J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsantani, M. S., Belin, P., Paterson, H. M., & McAleer, P. (2016). Low vocal pitch preference drives first impressions irrespective of context in male voices but not in female voices. Perception, 45(8), 946–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, S. K., & Fisher, J. E. (1979). Characteristics of simulated sexy voice. Folia Phoniatrica and Logopaedica, 31(4), 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J. (2015). La phonétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38(3), 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Borsel, J., Janssens, J., & De Bodt, M. (2009). Breathiness as a feminine voice characteristic: A perceptual approach. Journal of Voice, 23(3), 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorperian, H. K., Kent, R. D., Lindstrom, M. J., Kalina, C. M., Gentry, L. R., & Yandell, B. S. (2005). Development of vocal tract length during early childhood: A magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of the American Society of America, 117, 338–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Little, A. C., et al. (2008). Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine men’s voices. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Lee, A., Wu, W.-L., Liu, X., & Birkholz, P. (2013). Human vocal attractiveness as signaled by body size projection. PLoS One, 8(4), e62397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Compton, B. J., Heyman, G. D., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Vocal attractiveness and voluntarily pitch-shifted voices. Evolution and Human Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Driver, R. E. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of nonverbal behavior, 13, 67–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990791

  • Zuckerman, M., & Miyake, K. (1993). The attractive voice: What makes it so? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut pour la Recherche et le Développement, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes – Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France

    Melissa Barkat-Defradas, Michel Raymond & Alexandre Suire

Authors
  1. Melissa Barkat-Defradas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michel Raymond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandre Suire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Barkat-Defradas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Benjamin Weiss

  2. Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Jürgen Trouvain

  3. ISEM, Montpellier, France

    Melissa Barkat-Defradas

  4. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA

    John J. Ohala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barkat-Defradas, M., Raymond, M., Suire, A. (2021). Vocal Preferences in Humans: A Systematic Review. In: Weiss, B., Trouvain, J., Barkat-Defradas, M., Ohala, J.J. (eds) Voice Attractiveness. Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6627-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6627-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6626-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6627-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation