Skip to main content

Prediction for NGH Formation Area in Deepwater Gas Well

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Gas Hydrate Management in Deepwater Gas Well

Abstract

The low-temperature and high-pressure environment in deepwater is conducive to the hydrate formation, and the high risks of hydrate deposition and blockage in deepwater gas well/pipelines would do much harm to the on-site operations [1,2,3]. Therefore, the accurate prediction for NGH formation area in deepwater gas well/pipeline plays a role in analyzing the risks of hydrate deposition and blockage, designing the hydrate management scheme and ensuring the safety of the on-site operations. Currently, based on the relation between temperature and pressure fields distribution in well/pipeline and hydrate phase equilibrium curve, we could make an accurate prediction for the hydrate formation area [4,5,6,7,8].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reyna EM, Stewart SR (2001) Case history of the removal of a hydrate plug formed during deep water well testing. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arrieta VV, Torralba AO, Hernandez PC et al (2011) Case history: lessons learned from retrieval of coiled tubing stuck by massive hydrate plug when well testing in an ultradeepwater gas well in Mexico. SPE Prod Oper 26(4):337–342

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trummer SA, Mohallem R, Franco E et al (2013) Hydrate remediation during well testing operations in the deepwater Campos Basin, Brazil. In: SPE/ICoTA coiled tubing & well intervention conference & exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Z, Sun B, Gao Y et al (2008) Simulation computation of well kill ing with deepwater driller’s method. Acta Pet Sin 05:786–790

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Z, Sun B, Wang Z et al (2015) Prediction and analysis of natural gas hydrate formation region during deep water gas well testing. Chin J Hydrodyn 30(2):167–172

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Y, Wang Z, Sun B et al (2015) Two-phase flow heat transfer modeling for prediction of gas hydrate formation region in deepwater gas-well with water content. In: The 27th national hydrodynamics symposium

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Z, Zhao Y, Sun B et al (2016) Heat transfer model for annular-mist flow and its application in hydrate formation risk analysis during deepwater gas well testing. Chin J Hydrodyn 31(01):20–27

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Z, Sun B, Cheng H et al (2009) Prediction of natural gas hydrate formation area during deep water well control. Chin J Appl Mech 26(02):224–229

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Z, Yu J, Zhang J et al (2018) Improved thermal model considering hydrate formation and deposition in gas-dominated systems with free water. Fuel 236:870–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Liao Y, Zhang W et al (2018) Coupled temperature field model of gas-hydrate formation for thermal fluid fracturing. Appl Therm Eng 133:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Z, Zhao Y, Sun B et al (2016) Modeling of hydrate blockage in gas-dominated systems. Energy Fuels 30(6):4653–4666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun X, Sun B, Wang Z et al (2018) A hydrate shell growth model in bubble flow of water-dominated system considering intrinsic kinetics, mass and heat transfer mechanisms. Int J Heat Mass Transf 117:940–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawant P, Ishii M, Mori M (2009) Prediction of amount of entrained droplets in vertical annular two-phase flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30(4):715–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang ZY, Sun BJ, Cheng HQ et al (2008) Prediction of gas hydrate formation region in the wellbore of deepwater drilling. Pet Explor Dev 35(6):731–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Sun B, Gao Y et al (2010) Study on well annulus multiphase flow characteristic of gas kick during hydrate reservoir drilling. J Basic Sci Eng 18(01):129–140

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenzo MD, Aman ZM, Kozielski K et al (2014) Underinhibited hydrate formation and transport investigated using a single-pass gas-dominant flowloop. Energy Fuels 28(11):7274–7284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao Y, Sun B, Wang Z et al (2008) Calculation and analysis of wellbore temperature field in deepwater drilling. J China Univ Pet (Edition of Natural Science) 32(02): 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alves IN, Alhanati FJS, Shoham O (1992) A unified model for predicting flowing temperature distribution in wellbores and pipelines. SPE Prod Eng 04(7):363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasan AR, Kabir CS, Sayarpour M (2010) Simplified two-phase flow modeling in wellbores. J Petrol Sci Eng 72(1):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Wang Z, Liu S et al (2019) Prediction of hydrate deposition in pipelines to improve gas transportation efficiency and safety. Appl Energy 253:113521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deaton WM, Frost EM (1949) Gas hydrates and their relation to the operation of natural-gas pipe lines. American Gas Association

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamura T, Makino T, Sugahara T et al (2003) Stability boundaries of gas hydrates helped by methane—structure-H hydrates of methylcyclohexane and cis -1,2-dimethylcyclohexane. Chem Eng Sci 58(2):269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adisasmito S, Frank RJ, Sloan ED (1991) Hydrates of carbon dioxide and methane mixtures. J Chem Eng Data 36(1):68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner D, Boxall J, Yang S et al (2005) Development of a hydrate kinetic model and its incorporation into the OLGA2000® transient multiphase flow simulator. In: 5th international conference on gas hydrates, Trondheim, Norway 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen Q, Ye S, Liu C et al (2007) Research on formation kinetics of methane hydrate in porous media. Mar Geol Quat Geol 01:111–116

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Sun B, Wang X et al (2014) Prediction of natural gas hydrate formation region in wellbore during deep-water gas well testing. J Hydrodyn Ser. B 26(4): 568–576

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J, Wang Z, Sun B et al (2019) An integrated prediction model of hydrate blockage formation in deep-water gas wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 140:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Z, Sun B, Wang X et al (2014) Prediction of natural gas hydrate formation region in wellbore during deep-water gas well testing. J Hydrodyn 26(4):568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Z, Zhao Y, Zhang J et al (2018) Flow assurance during deepwater gas well testing: Hydrate blockage prediction and prevention. J Petrol Sci Eng 163:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Z, Sun B (2009) Annular multiphase flow behavior during deep water drilling and the effect of hydrate phase transition. Pet Sci 6(1):57–63

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyuan Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, Z., Sun, B., Gao, Y. (2020). Prediction for NGH Formation Area in Deepwater Gas Well. In: Natural Gas Hydrate Management in Deepwater Gas Well. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6418-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6418-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6417-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6418-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics