Advertisement

Prediction of Acoustical Performance with and Without Airflow Resistivity of Fibrous Natural Materials

Conference paper
  • 420 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Traditional sound-absorbing materials for noise control are rockwool and glasswool which serve the purpose pretty well but are accompanied by some serious health hazards during their manufacturing or processing or application. Hence researchers and practitioners are coming up with new materials, particularly from natural sources, which apart from being cheap and readily available, have good noise absorption properties along with minimum effect on environment and health hazards. When sound is incident on these materials, some portion is reflected back (due to impedance mismatch), some portion is dissipated within the material (due to thermal and viscous loss in the pores) and the remaining is transmitted to the medium behind the material. Sound absorption is defined as dissipation plus transmission; hence, any parameter which increases any of these two effects will increase the sound absorption. Just like the synthetic sound-absorbing materials, these natural materials are also porous in nature which creates sufficient interest to explore them for potential acoustical applications. Several researchers have conducted acoustical investigations on materials which are used in some other form such as bamboo, jute, kenaf, hemp, ramie, sisal, coconut coir, tea leaf fibre, betel nut fibre and also on some waste materials like recycled rubber, cigarette butt, bagasse, oil palm empty fruit bunch fibre. In this chapter, a mathematical model has been developed to predict the normal sound absorption coefficient of jute and waste cotton. It can also be predicted by estimating the airflow resistivity of a material and feeding that into established models but the amount of error encountered in this approach is often large. So, with an objective to minimise the error, characteristics impedance and complex wave number of the materials have been experimentally estimated. With the minimum sum of squares of error curve fitting approach, a MATLAB code has been developed to obtain the modified coefficients in Delany–Bazley (D–B) model. These equations have been used to predict the sound absorption coefficients of Jute fibres and waste cotton, which is compared with the actual ones obtained by conducting experiments on impedance tube. The modified model was found to be of the greater degree of accuracy than the original D–B model. Further, the airflow resistivity term was eliminated in the Matlab code and the model was used to predict the normal sound absorption coefficient at different frequencies. The results of this model were compared with the result of the original D–B model and experimentally estimated normal absorption. It was also found to be closer to the actual behaviour than the one predicted by D–B model.

Keywords

Natural fiber Acoustical mathematical modelling Sound absorption coefficients Jute Waste cotton 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Department of Science and Technology-Government of India, for funding this project. They are also thankful to Prof. A. R. Mohanty and IIT-Kharagpur for sharing their experimental facility with the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Asdrubali F, Schiavoni S, Horoshenkov K (2012) A review of sustainable materials for acoustic applications. Build Acoust 19:283–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koizumi T, Tsujiuchi N, Adachi A (2002) The development of sound absorbing materials using natural bamboo fibers. High Perform Struct Compos 59:157–166Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong Z, Bo L, Guangsu H, Jia H (2007) A novel composite sound absorber with recycled rubber particles. J Sound Vib 304:400–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ersoy S, Küçük H (2009) Investigation of industrial tea-leaf-fibre waste material for its sound absorption properties. Appl Acoust 70:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hosseini Fouladi M, Nor MJM, Ayub M, Leman ZA (2010) Utilization of coir fiber in multilayer acoustic absorption panel. Appl Acoust 71:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oldham DJ, Egan CA, Cookson RD (2011) Sustainable acoustic absorbers from the biomass. Appl Acoust 72:350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ballagh K (1996) Acoustical Properties of Wool. Appl Acoust 48:101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hao A, Zhao H, Chen JY (2013) Composites: Part B Kenaf/polypropylene nonwoven composites: the influence of manufacturing conditions on mechanical, thermal, and acoustical performance. Compos B Eng 54:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berardi U, Iannace G (2015) Acoustic characterization of natural fi bers for sound absorption. Appl Acoust 94:840–852Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gómez Escobar V, Maderuelo-Sanz R (2017) Acoustical performance of samples prepared with cigarette butts. Appl Acoust 125:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flanagan JL (2013) Speech analysis and perception, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–86Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delany ME, Bazley EN (1969) Acoustical properties o f fibrous absorbent materials. Appl Acoust 3:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miki Y (1990) Acoustical properties of porous materials-Modifications of Delany–Bazley models. J Acoust Soc Jpn (E) 11:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Komatsu T (2008) Improvement of the Delany–Bazley and Miki models for fibrous sound-absorbing materials. Acoust Sci Technol 29:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allard JF, Champoux Y (1992) New empirical equations for sound propagation in rigid frame fibrous materials. J Acoust Soc Am 91:3346–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kino N (2015) Further investigations of empirical improvements to the Johnson-Champoux-Allard model. Appl Acoust 96:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manning J, Panneton R (2013) Acoustical model for Shoddy-based fiber sound absorbers. Text Res J 83:1356–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones PW, Kessissoglou NJ (2015) Simplification of the Delany–Bazley approach for modelling the acoustic properties of a poroelastic foam. Appl Acoust 88:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fatima S, Mohanty AR (2016) Acoustical characterization of bulk natural fibrous material using flow resistivity. In: Paper presented at 45th international congress and exposition on noise control engineering INTER-NOISE 2016, Hamburg, Germany, 21–24 August 2016Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohanty A, Fatima S (2016) Noise control using green materials. SV Sound Vib Instrum Issue 13:13–15Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fatima S, Mohanty AR (2011) Acoustical and fire-retardant properties of jute composite materials. Appl Acoust 72:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhowmick M, Mukhopadhyay S, Alagirusamy R (2012) Mechanical properties of natural fibre-reinforced composites. Text Prog 44:85–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arenas JP, Crocker MJ (2010) Recent trends in porous sound-absorbing materials. Sound Vib Mater Ref Issue, 12–17Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bhattacharya MC, Guy RW, Crocker MJ (1971) Coincidence effect with sound waves in a finite plate. J Sound Vib 18:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramis J, Del Rey R, Alba J et al (2014) A model for acoustic absorbent materials derived from coconut fiber. Mater Constr 64:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rwawiire S, Tomkova B, Militky J, Hes L, Kale BM (2017) Acoustic and thermal properties of a cellulose nonwoven natural fabric (barkcloth). Appl Acoust 116:177–183Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Automotive Research & Tribology (Formerly ITMMEC), Indian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations