Skip to main content

Critical Digital Citizenship: A Call to Action for Educators and Educational Researchers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Designing the Social

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education ((CSTE,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter explores what a consideration of the manner in which design influences social experiences online might mean for educational researchers, educators, and pupils. The chapter begins by critiquing the current approaches towards technology in education, particularly highlighting the one-size-fits-all model of technology in classrooms, the creeping ‘data gaze’ in education, and the attempts to present and view technology as apolitical. The chapter finishes by summarising how Comic Theory (presented in Chap. 6 of this book) can help understand the interactions of young people online in a nuanced and careful manner. To echo Larkin’s (2008, 3) words, ‘what media are needs to be interrogated, not presumed’. This holds true for education and for our understanding of media writ large. It is hoped that Comic Theory presents a method through which this interrogation can take place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allsopp, D. H., Colucci, K., Doone, E., Perez, L., Bryant, E., Jr., & Holhfeld, T. N. (2012). Interactive whiteboard technology for students with disabilities: A year long exploratory study. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2011). ‘Digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’ discourses. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Digital difference: Perspectives on online learning (pp. 159–169). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, G., & Dutton, W. H., With Lefkowitz, J. (2019). Perceived threats to privacy online: The internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Survey 2019. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boczkowski, P. J., Matassi, M., & Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottom, T. M. (2017). Black CyberFeminism: Ways forward for intersectionality and digital sociology. In J. Daniels, K. Gregory, & T. McMillan Cottom (Eds.), Digital sociologies. Policy Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., & Jurgenson, N. (2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despujol, I. M., Turro, C., Busqueis, J., & Canero, A. (2014). Analysis of demographics and results of student’s opinion survey of a large scale MOOC deployment for the Spanish speaking community. In Proceedings of Frontiers in education conference (pp. 1–8). Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emejulu, A., & McGregor, C. (2019). Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A ‘learning revolution’? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, P. (2017). Yes, we must decolonise: Our teaching has to go beyond elite white men. Accessed 09/2019. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/27/decolonise-elite-white-men-decolonising-cambridge-university-english-curriculum-literature

  • Gov.UK. (2019). Statutory guidance National curriculum in England: computing programmes of study. Published 11 September 2013. Access 09/2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study

  • Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iniesto, F., & Rodrigo, C. (2016). A preliminary study for developing accessible MOOC services. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 6(2), 126–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet, 4, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, B. (2008). Signal and noise: Media, infrastructure, and urban culture in Nigeria. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loren, T. (2019, March 14). The hottest chat app for teens is … Google docs. The Atlantic. Access 09/2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/03/hottest-chat-app-teens-google-docs/584857/

  • Macleod, H., Haywood, J., Woodgate, A., & Alkhatnai, M. (2014). Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions. TechTrends, 59(1), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munafo, J., Diedrick, M., & Stoffregen, T. A. (2017). The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects. Experimental Brain Research, 235(3), 889–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016). Self-tracking. Boston: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: Interactive or just whiteboards? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OFCOM. (2019, February). Children & parents: Media use and attitudes report 2018. OFCOM. Accessed 08/2019. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-aChildren and parents: media use and attitudes report 2018nd-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2018.

  • OECD (2013). New sources of growth: Knowledge-based capital: Key analyses and policy conclusions: Synthesis report. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/knowledge-based-capital-synthesis.pdf

  • Privacy International. (2019). No body’s business but mine: How menstruation apps are sharing your data. Access 09/2019. https://www.privacyinternational.org/long-read/3196/no-bodys-business-mine-how-menstruation-apps-are-sharing-your-datas.

  • Rowe, E. (2019). Capitalism without capital: The intangible economy of education reform. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just “lipstick”? Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J., & Picciano, A. G. (2013). The great American education-industrial complex: Ideology, technology, and profit. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, V. (2018). Teachers are now being asked to punch time clocks. What does that mean for their profession?. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2018/03/04/teachers-are-now-being-asked-to-punch-time-clocks-what-does-that-mean-for-theirprofession/?utm_term=.57738f160db4

  • Weller, K. (2016). Trying to understand social media users and usage: The forgotten features of social media platforms. Online Information Review, 40(2), 256–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N. B. (2016). The social media ecology: User perceptions, strategies and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 89–100). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dyer, H.T. (2020). Critical Digital Citizenship: A Call to Action for Educators and Educational Researchers. In: Designing the Social. Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education, vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5716-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics