Advertisement

Influencing Factor Analysis of Logistics Service Satisfaction in China: A Binary Logit Model Approach

  • Wen Xu
  • JiaJun LiEmail author
  • Bin Shen
Conference paper
  • 43 Downloads
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 185)

Abstract

With the continuous growth of the number of Internet users and the continuous expansion of the online retail market in China, consumers have put forward higher requirements for logistics services. Thus, this study uses a binary logit model to study China’s logistics services from the perspective of customers, and the main factors affecting customer satisfaction with logistics services were explored. First, questionnaire was scientifically designed, and a total of 356 samples was collected in the online survey, of which 310 samples considered to be valid, and the questionnaire effective rate was 87.1%. Second, based on the survey data, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested and factor analysis was performed. The results showed that the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were good, and the factor structure of the questionnaire could meet the needs of this study. Finally, the binary logit model was used to analyze the main factors affecting customer satisfaction with logistics services. The results show that facilities, convenience, reliability, empathy, economics and timeliness have a significant impact on logistics service satisfaction, and among them, facilities, economics and convenience are the most important factors. The research results can effectively improve China’s overall logistics service level and have strong practical significance.

Keywords

Logistics services Questionnaire Factor analysis Binary logit model 

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Guo, J., Xu, L., Xiao, G., Gong, Z.: Improving multilingual semantic interoperation in cross-organizational enterprise systems through concept disambiguation. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 8(3), 647–658 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, J., Li, L., Xu, L.: A randomized pricing decision support system in electronic commerce. Decis. Support Syst. 58, 43–52 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CNNIC: The 44th statistical report on internet development in China, Beijing. Available at: http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-08/30/c_1124939590.htm, last accessed 2019/12/24
  4. 4.
    Christopher, M.: Logistics and supply chain management: strategies for reducing cost and improving service. Pitman Publishing, Financial Times, London (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mentzer, J.T., Flint, D.J., Hult, G.T.M.: Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process. J. Mark. 65(4), 82–104 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sudrajat, D., Amin, T.M.Z.: Strategic competitiveness improvement of indonesian logistics services companies through competitive advantage improvement: a conceptual model. Adv. Sci. Lett. 22(12), 4540–4543 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, X., Yuen, K.F., Wong, Y.D., Teo, C.C.: E-consumer adoption of innovative last-mile logistics services: a comparison of behavioural models. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excellence 1–27 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thao, P.V., David, B.G., David, A.M.: Exploring logistics service quality in Hai Phong Vietnam. Asian J. Shipping Logistics (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin, C.C., Chang, C.H.: Evaluating skill requirement for logistics operation practitioners: based on the perceptions of logistics service providers and academics in Taiwan. Asian J. Shipping Logistics 34(4), 328–336 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Limbourg, S., Giang, H.T.Q., Cools, M.: Logistics service quality: the case of Da Nang city. Procedia Eng. 142, 124–130 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, Y., Luo, J., Zhou, L., Ieromonachou, P., Huang, L., Cai, S. Ma, S.: The impacts of service quality and customer satisfaction in the e-commerce context. In: 2014 11th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), June, 1–6 (2014). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu, C., et al.: Potential risk and its influencing factors for separated bicycle paths. Accid. Anal. Prev. 87, 59–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Briggs, E., Landry, T.D., Daugherty, P.J.: Investigating the influence of velocity performance on satisfaction with third party logistics service. Ind. Mark. Manage. 39(4), 640–649 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rahmat, A.K., Faisol, N.: Manufacturers satisfaction on logistics service quality: operational, relational and national culture. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 224, 339–346 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stopka, O., Černá, L., Zitrický, V.: Methodology for measuring the customer satisfaction with the logistics services. NAŠE MORE: znanstveno-stručni časopis za more i pomorstvo 63(3), 189–194 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tontini, G., Söilen, K.S., Zanchett, R.: Nonlinear antecedents of customer satisfaction and loyalty in third-party logistics services (3PL). Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logistics 29(5), 1116–1135 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duc N.L., Hong T.N., Phuc H. T.: Port logistics service quality and customer satisfaction: empirical evidence from vietnam. Asian J. Shipping Logistics (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hua, W., Jing, Z.: An empirical study on e-commerce logistics service quality and customer satisfaction. WHICEB Proc. 269–275 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, K., Ling, F., Feng, Z., Wang, K., Shao, C.: Why do drivers continue driving while fatigued? an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 98, 141–149 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, X., Medal, H., Qu, X.: Connected heterogeneous infrastructure location design under additive service utilities. Transp. Res. Part B 120, 99–124 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahmed, M.M., Franke, R., Ksaibati, et al.: Effects of truck traffic on crash injury severity on rural highways in wyoming using bayesian binary logit models. Accid. Anal. Prev. (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, S., Zhang, W., Qu, X.: Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations. Transp. Res. Part B 118, 318–335 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Guangxi Computing Center CO., Ltd.Guangxi Communications Investment Group CO., Ltd.NanningChina
  3. 3.School of Civil Engineering and TransportationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations