How to Model the Influence of In-vehicle Crowding on Travel Behavior: A Comparison Among Moderation, Independent Variable and Interaction

  • Kun GaoEmail author
  • Jieyu Fan
  • Ziling Zeng
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 185)


Accurate modeling of travel choice behavior is crucial for effective transport demand forecasting, management and planning. This study tries to shed light on the appropriate modeling approach concerning the influences of in-vehicle crowding on mode choice behavior in the multimodal network. Stated preference surveys covering four commuting transport modes and four influencing factors are conducted to collect empirical behavior data. Three modeling methods, treating the in-vehicle crowding as a moderator of perceived travel time, as an independent variable and by incorporating interaction effect, are empirically compared. The result indicates that there is a bidirectional interaction between travel time and in-vehicle crowding. The influence of in-vehicle crowding increases with increasing travel time and vice versa. Considering crowding as an independent variable and taking the effects of travel time on the perception of in-vehicle crowding are the best ways to depict the overall influences of in-vehicle crowding. The sensitivity analysis shows that increasing the cost of using car is comparatively effective for reducing car usage. Shortening the travel time of public transit and improving service quality such as travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding are more useful in attracting car users as compared to reduction in the cost of public transit. The results provide insights into travelers’ behavior in the multimodal network and could support scientific transport management and planning.


Travel behavior Sustainable transport system In-vehicle crowding Multimodal network 


  1. 1.
    SURCTDRI, Transportation operation annual report of Shanghai (Year of 2017). 2018, Shanghai Uban and Rural Construction and Transportation Development Research Institue (SURCTDRI): ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu, C., et al.: Potential risk and its influencing factors for separated bicycle paths. Accid. Anal. Prev. 87, 59–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beaudoin, J., Farzin, Y.H., Lawell, C.-Y.C.L.: Public transit investment and sustainable transportation: a review of studies of transit’s impact on traffic congestion and air quality. Res. Trans. Econ. (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao, K., et al.: Perceptions of mode-specific travel time reliability and crowding in multimodal trip. Trans. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, pp. 1–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, H., Gao, K., Tu, H.: Variations in mode-specific valuations of travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding: implications for demand estimation. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 103, 250–263 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pel, A.J., Bel, N.H., Pieters, M.: Including passengers’ response to crowding in the dutch national train passenger assignment model. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 66, 111–126 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Redman, L., et al.: Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp. Policy 25, 119–127 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qu, X., Meng, Q.: The economic importance of the straits of malacca and Singapore: an extreme-scenario analysis. Transp. Res. Part E Logistics Transp. Rev. 48(1), 258–265 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Litman, T.: Valuing transit service quality improvement. J. Public Transp. 11, 43–63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tirachini, A., Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M.: Crowding in public transport systems: effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 53, 36–52 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Batarce, M., et al.: Valuing crowding in public transport systems using mixed stated/revealed preferences data: the case of Santiago. In: TRB 94th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Washington DC (2015) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao, K., Shao, M., Sun, L.: Roles of psychological resistance to change factors and heterogeneity in car stickiness and transit loyalty in mode shift behavior: a hybrid choice approach. Sustainability 11(17), 4813 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, S., Zhang, W., Qu, X.: Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations. Transp. Res. Part B Methodological 118, 318–335 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, S., Qu, X.: Station choice for Australian commuter rail lines: equilibrium and optimal fare design. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258(1), 144–154 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bie, Y., et al.: Dynamic headway control for high-frequency bus line based on speed guidance and intersection signal adjustment. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 35(1), 4–25 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Crowding and public transport: a review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal. Transp. Policy 18(6), 880–887 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whelan, G.A. Crockett, J.: An investigation of the willingness to pay to reduce rail overcrowding. In: International Conference on Choice Modelling. Harrogate, England, Apr (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tirachini, A., et al.: Valuation of sitting and standing in metro trains using revealed preferences. Transp. Policy 47, 94–104 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vovsha, P., et al. Statistical Analysis of Transit User Preferences Including In-vehicle Crowding and Service Reliability. In: Compendium of papers TRB 93rd Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shao, M., Li, T., Sun, L.: Survey method and model of passengers’ cost perception of crowding level in bus. J. Tongji Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 07, 1031–1034 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirsch, L., Thompson, K.: I can sit but I’d rather stand: commuter’s experience of crowdedness and fellow passenger behaviour in carriages on Australian metropolitan trains. (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wardman, M., Murphy, P.: Passengers’ valuations of train seating layout, position and occupancy. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 74, 222–238 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao, K., et al.: Heterogeneity in valuation of travel time reliability and in-vehicle crowding for mode choices in multimodal networks. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 144(10), 04018061 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, Z., Hensher, D.A.: Crowding in public transport: a review of objective and subjective measures. J. Public Transp. 16(2), 6 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuang, Y., Qu, X., Wang, S.: A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. Accid. Anal. Prev. 77, 137–148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qu, X., et al.: Potential crash risks of expressway on-ramps and off-ramps: a case study in Beijing. China. Safety science 70, 58–62 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Civil EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGoteborgSweden
  2. 2.College of Transportation EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations