Injury Severity Analysis of Secondary Incidents

  • Jing Li
  • Jingqiu GuoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 185)


Limited efforts have been made to unveil the factors affecting the severity of secondary incidents. Compared to primary incidents, secondary incidents are more injury and fatality prone. Secondary incidents that occurred on the Interstate-5 in California within five years were collected. Detailed real-time traffic flow data, geometric characteristics and weather conditions were obtained. First, a random forest-based (RF) feature selection approach was adopted. Then, support vector machine (SVM) models were developed to investigate the effects of contributing factors. For comparison, RF and ordered logistic (OL) models were also built based on the same dataset. It was found that the SVM model has high capacity for solving classification problems with limited data availability. Further, sensitivity analysis assessed the impacts of explanatory variables on the injury severity level. The results can provide guidance for the development of countermeasures and improvement of road safety policies to potentially reduce road trauma caused by secondary incidents.


  1. 1.
    Xu, C., Xu, S., Wang, C., Li, J.: Investigating the factors affecting secondary crash frequency caused by one primary crash using zero-inflated ordered probit regression. Physica A 524, 121–129 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung, Y.: Identifying primary and secondary crashes from spatiotemporal crash impact analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2386(1), 62–71 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, V.: Developing an Algorithm to Identify Secondary Incidents. (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kitali, A.E., Alluri, P., Sando, T., Lentz, R.: Impact of primary incident spatiotemporal influence thresholds on the detection of secondary crashes. Transp. Res. Rec. (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodall, N.J.: Probability of secondary crash occurrence on freeways with the use of private-sector speed data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2635(1), 11–18 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jalayer, M., Baratian-Ghorghi, F., Zhou, H.: Identifying and characterizing secondary crashes on the Alabama state highway systems. Adv. Transp. Stud. 37 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, H., Haghani, A., Samuel, S., Knodler, M.A.: Real-time prediction and avoidance of secondary crashes under unexpected traffic congestion. Accid. Anal. Prev. 112, 39–49 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santos, M.S., Soares, J.P., Abreu, P.H., Araujo, H., Santos, J.: Cross-validation for imbalanced datasets: Avoiding overoptimistic and overfitting approaches [research frontier]. IEEE Comp. Intell. Mag. 13(4), 59–76 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qu, X., Yu, Y., Zhou, M., Lin, C.T., Wang, X.: Jointly dampening traffic oscillations and improving energy consumption with electric, connected and automated vehicles: a reinforcement learning based approach. Appl. Energy 257, 114030 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, M., Yu, Y., Qu, X.: development of an efficient driving strategy for connected and automated vehicles at signalized intersections: a reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21(1), 433–443 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, X., Medal, H., Qu, X.: Connected Heterogeneous infrastructure location design under additive service utilities. Transp. Res. Part B 120, 99–124 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kitali, A.E., Alluri, P., Sando, T., Haule, H., Kidando, E., Lentz, R.: Likelihood estimation of secondary crashes using Bayesian complementary log-log model. Accid. Anal. Prev. 119, 58–67 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu, C., Liu, P., Yang, B., Wang, W.: Real-time estimation of secondary crash likelihood on freeways using high-resolution loop detector data. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technolo. 71, 406–418 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., Franklin, J.: The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Math. Intell. 27(2), 83–85 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knerr, S., Personnaz, L., Dreyfus, G.: Single-layer learning revisited: a stepwise procedure for building and training a neural network. Neurocomputing 41–50 (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuang, Y., Qu, X., Wang, S.: A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. Acci. Anal. Prev. 77, 137–148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, C., Zhang, G., Qian, Z., Tarefder, R.A., Tian, Z.: Investigating driver injury severity patterns in rollover crashes using support vector machine models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 90, 128–139 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meng, Q., Qu, X.: Estimation of vehicle crash frequencies in road tunnels. Accid. Anal. Prev. 48, 254–263 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic EngineeringMinistry of Education, Tongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations