Skip to main content

Novel Collecting Decision Optimization Algorithm for Enhanced Dynamic Performance of Hybrid Power Source-Based SOFC and Supercapacitor for Grid Integration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Electrical Control and Signal Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 665))

  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes a hybrid grid-connected microgrid system comprising of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and a supercapacitor (SC). The SOFC possesses many advantages over other fuel cells in having high dynamic performance, high combined heat, long-term stability, fuel flexibility, low emissions and relatively low cost. Nevertheless, the most significant disadvantage of SOFC is that it alone fails to compensate the system because of its high operating temperature which makes the system response sluggish in nature. To eradicate this problem, a SC-based energy storage system (ESS) is coordinated with SOFC to enhance the transient response of the system. SC has advantages over other ESSs with its high capacitor capacity and faster charging and discharging capability. A hybrid system is considered to be more efficient as it emits zero amount of carbon pollutants, thereby making the system environment-friendly. The conventional PID controller fails to respond to nonlinearities in the system. So for dynamic operation of the PID controller, a novel collective decision optimization algorithm (CDOA) is proposed in this paper. The hybrid system is designed in MATLAB/Simulink architecture, and to verify the efficacy of the proposed controller, the system is led to a disturbance. A detailed comparative analysis of SOFC with PID, hybrid system with PID and hybrid system with CDOA-tuned PID has been done. In addition to this, harmonics study of each case has been carried out. The proposed hybrid system with the CDOA technique outperforms others in satisfying well the IEEE constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. İnci, M., Türksoy, Ö.: Review of fuel cells to grid interface: configurations, technical challenges and trends. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 1353–1370 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yalcinoz, T., Alam, M.S.: Improved dynamic performance of hybrid PEM fuel cells and ultracapacitors for portable applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33(7), 1932–1940 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nesaraj, A.S.: Recent developments in solid oxide fuel cell technology—a review (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Irshad, M., et al.: A brief description of high temperature solid oxide fuel cell’s operation, materials, design, fabrication technologies and performance. Appl. Sci. 6(3), 75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarov, V. D., et al.: Hybrid power systems with renewable energy sources types, structures, trends for research and development. In: Proceedings of International Conference ELMA2005, Sofia, Bulgaria (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhikabhai, Y.: Hybrid power systems and their potential in the Pacific islands. SOPAC Miscellaneous, Report 406 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, X., et al.: The role of nanomaterials in redox-based supercapacitors for next generation energy storage devices. Nanoscale 3(3), 839–855 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke, A., Zhao, H.: Applications of supercapacitors in electric and hybrid vehicles. ITS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rawale, S., Kamble, C.: Study and analysis of supercapacitor with its applications. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2(3), 2194–2196 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duarte-Galvan, C., et al.: Advantages and disadvantages of control theories applied in greenhouse climate control systems. Span. J. Agric. Res. 10(4), 926–938 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao, K.S., Mishra, R.: Comparative study of P, PI and PID controller for speed control of VSI-fed induction motor. Int. J. Eng. Dev. Res. 2(2), 2740–2744 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hidalgo, A., Albors, J.: Innovation management techniques and tools: a review from theory and practice. R&D Manage. 38(2), 113–127 (2008); Das, S., et al.: Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In: Foundations of Computational Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 23–55. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dorigo, M., Birattari, M.: Ant colony optimization. Springer, US (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Passino, K.M.: Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 22(3), 52–67 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy, J.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, pp. 760–766 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dabbaghjamanesh, M., Kavousi-Fard, A., Mehraeen, S.: Effective scheduling of reconfigurable microgrids with dynamic thermal line rating. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 66(2), 1552–1564 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kupecki, J., Jewulski, J., Milewski, J.: Multi-level mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells. In: Clean Energy for Better Environment. IntechOpen (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chaudhary, P., Rizwan, M.: Hybrid control approach for PV/FC fed voltage source converter tied to grid. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43(14), 6851–6866 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasaneen, B.M., Mohammed, A.A.E.: Design and simulation of DC/DC boost converter. In: 2008 12th International Middle-East Power System Conference. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Inoue, S., Akagi, H.: A bidirectional DC–DC converter for an energy storage system with galvanic isolation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 22(6), 2299–2306 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, D., Li, H.: A ZVS bi-directional DC–DC converter for multiple energy storage elements. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 21(5), 1513–1517 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jun, R., Kai, W., Liwei, L.: Characteristics analysis of ultracapacitor-battery hybrid energy storage system. In: 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T., Astrom, K.J.: Advanced PID control, vol. 461. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Messner, W.C., Tilbury, D.M., Hill, R.: Control Tutorials for MATLAB® and Simulink® (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ramadan, R.A.: Fuzzy brain storming optimisation algorithm. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Inform. 5(1), 67–79 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends. Phys. Life Rev. 2(4), 353–373 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Das, S., et al.: Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In: Foundations of Computational Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 23–55. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holland, J.H.: Genetic algorithms. Sci. Am. 267, 66–72 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, Q., et al.: Collective decision optimization algorithm: a new heuristic optimization method. Neurocomputing 221, 123–137 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Q., et al.: Modified collective decision optimization algorithm with application in trajectory planning of UAV. Appl. Intell. 48(8), 2328–2354 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhashree Choudhury .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Parameters

Values

SOFC

VO = 40, E = 45, R1 + R2 = 0.4 Ω, R3 = 0.06 and C = 0.25 F

SC

VO = 30 V, supercapacitor internal resistance = 0.015 Ω, supercapacitor-rated capacitance = 50 F, number of series capacitors—4 and number of parallel capacitors—1

Boost

L = 0.8 mH, C = 100 µF, Fs = 30 kHz, VO = 100 and Vin = 40 V

BBC

L = 1 mH, C1 = C2 = 14 µF, Fs = 25 kHz, VO = 50 and Vin = 30 V

Rectifier load

Nominal frequency—50 Hz, power—2500 W

Grid

V = 100, X/R = 7, f = 50 Hz

\({\text{SOC}}_{\text{initial}}\)

50

\({\text{SOC}}_{\text{final}}\)

100

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Choudhury, S., Sen, B., Khandelwal, N., Satpathy, A. (2020). Novel Collecting Decision Optimization Algorithm for Enhanced Dynamic Performance of Hybrid Power Source-Based SOFC and Supercapacitor for Grid Integration. In: Pradhan, G., Morris, S., Nayak, N. (eds) Advances in Electrical Control and Signal Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 665. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5262-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5262-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5261-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5262-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics