Abstract
This paper describes a hybrid grid-connected microgrid system comprising of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and a supercapacitor (SC). The SOFC possesses many advantages over other fuel cells in having high dynamic performance, high combined heat, long-term stability, fuel flexibility, low emissions and relatively low cost. Nevertheless, the most significant disadvantage of SOFC is that it alone fails to compensate the system because of its high operating temperature which makes the system response sluggish in nature. To eradicate this problem, a SC-based energy storage system (ESS) is coordinated with SOFC to enhance the transient response of the system. SC has advantages over other ESSs with its high capacitor capacity and faster charging and discharging capability. A hybrid system is considered to be more efficient as it emits zero amount of carbon pollutants, thereby making the system environment-friendly. The conventional PID controller fails to respond to nonlinearities in the system. So for dynamic operation of the PID controller, a novel collective decision optimization algorithm (CDOA) is proposed in this paper. The hybrid system is designed in MATLAB/Simulink architecture, and to verify the efficacy of the proposed controller, the system is led to a disturbance. A detailed comparative analysis of SOFC with PID, hybrid system with PID and hybrid system with CDOA-tuned PID has been done. In addition to this, harmonics study of each case has been carried out. The proposed hybrid system with the CDOA technique outperforms others in satisfying well the IEEE constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
İnci, M., Türksoy, Ö.: Review of fuel cells to grid interface: configurations, technical challenges and trends. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 1353–1370 (2019)
Yalcinoz, T., Alam, M.S.: Improved dynamic performance of hybrid PEM fuel cells and ultracapacitors for portable applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33(7), 1932–1940 (2008)
Nesaraj, A.S.: Recent developments in solid oxide fuel cell technology—a review (2010)
Irshad, M., et al.: A brief description of high temperature solid oxide fuel cell’s operation, materials, design, fabrication technologies and performance. Appl. Sci. 6(3), 75 (2016)
Lazarov, V. D., et al.: Hybrid power systems with renewable energy sources types, structures, trends for research and development. In: Proceedings of International Conference ELMA2005, Sofia, Bulgaria (2005)
Bhikabhai, Y.: Hybrid power systems and their potential in the Pacific islands. SOPAC Miscellaneous, Report 406 (2005)
Zhao, X., et al.: The role of nanomaterials in redox-based supercapacitors for next generation energy storage devices. Nanoscale 3(3), 839–855 (2011)
Burke, A., Zhao, H.: Applications of supercapacitors in electric and hybrid vehicles. ITS (2015)
Rawale, S., Kamble, C.: Study and analysis of supercapacitor with its applications. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2(3), 2194–2196 (2015)
Duarte-Galvan, C., et al.: Advantages and disadvantages of control theories applied in greenhouse climate control systems. Span. J. Agric. Res. 10(4), 926–938 (2012)
Rao, K.S., Mishra, R.: Comparative study of P, PI and PID controller for speed control of VSI-fed induction motor. Int. J. Eng. Dev. Res. 2(2), 2740–2744 (2014)
Hidalgo, A., Albors, J.: Innovation management techniques and tools: a review from theory and practice. R&D Manage. 38(2), 113–127 (2008); Das, S., et al.: Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In: Foundations of Computational Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 23–55. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Dorigo, M., Birattari, M.: Ant colony optimization. Springer, US (2010)
Passino, K.M.: Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 22(3), 52–67 (2002)
Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming (1997)
Kennedy, J.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, pp. 760–766 (2010)
Dabbaghjamanesh, M., Kavousi-Fard, A., Mehraeen, S.: Effective scheduling of reconfigurable microgrids with dynamic thermal line rating. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 66(2), 1552–1564 (2018)
Kupecki, J., Jewulski, J., Milewski, J.: Multi-level mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells. In: Clean Energy for Better Environment. IntechOpen (2012)
Chaudhary, P., Rizwan, M.: Hybrid control approach for PV/FC fed voltage source converter tied to grid. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43(14), 6851–6866 (2018)
Hasaneen, B.M., Mohammed, A.A.E.: Design and simulation of DC/DC boost converter. In: 2008 12th International Middle-East Power System Conference. IEEE (2008)
Inoue, S., Akagi, H.: A bidirectional DC–DC converter for an energy storage system with galvanic isolation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 22(6), 2299–2306 (2007)
Liu, D., Li, H.: A ZVS bi-directional DC–DC converter for multiple energy storage elements. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 21(5), 1513–1517 (2006)
Jun, R., Kai, W., Liwei, L.: Characteristics analysis of ultracapacitor-battery hybrid energy storage system. In: 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC). IEEE (2017)
Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T., Astrom, K.J.: Advanced PID control, vol. 461. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, Research Triangle Park, NC (2006)
Messner, W.C., Tilbury, D.M., Hill, R.: Control Tutorials for MATLAB® and Simulink® (1999)
Ramadan, R.A.: Fuzzy brain storming optimisation algorithm. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Inform. 5(1), 67–79 (2017)
Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends. Phys. Life Rev. 2(4), 353–373 (2005)
Das, S., et al.: Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In: Foundations of Computational Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 23–55. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Holland, J.H.: Genetic algorithms. Sci. Am. 267, 66–72 (1992)
Zhang, Q., et al.: Collective decision optimization algorithm: a new heuristic optimization method. Neurocomputing 221, 123–137 (2017)
Zhang, Q., et al.: Modified collective decision optimization algorithm with application in trajectory planning of UAV. Appl. Intell. 48(8), 2328–2354 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Parameters | Values |
---|---|
SOFC | VO = 40, E = 45, R1 + R2 = 0.4 Ω, R3 = 0.06 and C = 0.25 F |
SC | VO = 30 V, supercapacitor internal resistance = 0.015 Ω, supercapacitor-rated capacitance = 50 F, number of series capacitors—4 and number of parallel capacitors—1 |
Boost | L = 0.8 mH, C = 100 µF, Fs = 30 kHz, VO = 100 and Vin = 40 V |
BBC | L = 1 mH, C1 = C2 = 14 µF, Fs = 25 kHz, VO = 50 and Vin = 30 V |
Rectifier load | Nominal frequency—50 Hz, power—2500 W |
Grid | V = 100, X/R = 7, f = 50 Hz |
\({\text{SOC}}_{\text{initial}}\) | 50 |
\({\text{SOC}}_{\text{final}}\) | 100 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choudhury, S., Sen, B., Khandelwal, N., Satpathy, A. (2020). Novel Collecting Decision Optimization Algorithm for Enhanced Dynamic Performance of Hybrid Power Source-Based SOFC and Supercapacitor for Grid Integration. In: Pradhan, G., Morris, S., Nayak, N. (eds) Advances in Electrical Control and Signal Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 665. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5262-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5262-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5261-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5262-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)