Skip to main content

How Love Is Possible: A Christian Approach to the Problem of Social Justice in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Social Justice
  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of love and justice has become increasingly an outstanding moral and social problem in contemporary China. The marginalized group of people in the areas of education, job market, and social welfare in China raises various problems of conflict and inequality, which demand justice in those areas. Regarding just settlement for this group, some relevant studies in disciplines such as political science, law and sociology have attended more to institutional, distributive arrangements and economic factors. This chapter aims to understand the moral identity of this marginalized group from Christian theological perspective of love and explore its implications to the problem of social justice in China. Drawing from and attempting to integrate both Reinhold Niebuhr and Nicholas Wolterstorff’s distinctive positions on love and justice, this chapter points out the possibilities and limitations of applying Christian love in its relationship to social justice in Chinese society. It proposes that if justice is embedded into the ideal of love, justice will not become a pure and mechanic political concept, on the one hand, and the ideas of “justice in love” and “love complementing justice” will enrich and enhance the discourse on social justice in the Chinese context on the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    United Nations [20].

  2. 2.

    Liang [8].

  3. 3.

    Outka [14].

  4. 4.

    Robertson [19].

  5. 5.

    Niebuhr [13].

  6. 6.

    Ibid., p. 81.

  7. 7.

    Niebuhr [12].

  8. 8.

    Niebuhr [10].

  9. 9.

    Dorrien [4].

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., xxiii.

  12. 12.

    Niebuhr [12, p. 28].

  13. 13.

    Niebuhr [10].

  14. 14.

    Ibid., p. 108.

  15. 15.

    Ramsey [17].

  16. 16.

    Ibid., p. 94.

  17. 17.

    Lovin [9].

  18. 18.

    Bennett [2].

  19. 19.

    Dorrien [4, xxiii].

  20. 20.

    Wolterstorff [21].

  21. 21.

    Ibid., p. 67.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., p. 63.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., p. 71.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., p. 90.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., p. 83.

  26. 26.

    Niebuhr [11].

  27. 27.

    Niebuhr [11, pp. 80–81].

  28. 28.

    Rasmussen [18].

  29. 29.

    At this point, I have been aware of the fact of religious diversity in China. In 2014 Pew Research Center produced an index that ranks each country by its level of religious diversity, in which Singapore is listed the first, Taiwan the second, mainland China the ninth, and Hong Kong the tenth. Here we see the Chinese societies has high level of religious diversity and the Asia-Pacific region has the highest level of religious diversity. In more details, in mainland China, the percentage of the followers of major religions is: Christian 5.1%, Muslim 1.8%, Buddhist 18.2%, Folk religion 21.9%, and particularly 52.2% (more than half) identified “unaffiliated.” See Pew Research Centre [15].

  30. 30.

    See Benedict [1].

  31. 31.

    See Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace [16].

  32. 32.

    Ding [3].

  33. 33.

    Zhiping Liang, ‘The Death of a Detained: The Dilemma and Way-out of Identity Politics in Contemporary China’, [Bei Shourong Zhe Zhisi: Dangdai Zhongguo Shenfen Zhengzhi de Kunjing Yu Chulu “被收容者之死: 当代中国身份政治的困境与出路”], in Zhiping Zhang, Social Justice in Transformative Period, p. 188.

  34. 34.

    Goodin [7].

  35. 35.

    Frederking [5].

  36. 36.

    Forrester [6].

References

  1. Benedict XVI. (2019). Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate of the Supreme Pontiff. Retrieved October 30, 2019, from http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate.html.

  2. Bennett, J. C. (1956). Reinhold Niebuhr’s social ethics. In W. K. Charles & Bretall R. W. (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr: His religious, social, and political thought (p. 59).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ding, G. X. (1997). Learning from theology of liberation, theology of Pierre Teilhard de Chardi and process theology. In G. X. Ding (Ed.), Collected works of Guangxun Ding (p. 214). Nanjing: Translation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorrien, G. (2011). Introduction to Reinhold Niebuhr. In The children of light and the children of darkness (p. xxii). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frederking, L. C. (2014). Reconstructing social justice (p. 97). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forrester, D. B. (2010). Forrester on Christian ethics and practical theology: Collected writings on Christianity, India, and the social order (p. 252). Surrey, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibility (pp. 26–27). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, Z. (2010). Introduction. In Z. Liang (Ed.) Social justice in transformative period: Problem and prospect [Zhuanxingqi de Shehui Gongzheng: Wenti yu Qianjing 转型期的社会公正:问题与前景] (p. 5). Beijing: Three Joint Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lovin, R. (1995). Reinhold Niebuhr and Christian realism (p. 199). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niebuhr, R. (1935). An interpretation of Christian ethics (p. 140). New York, London: Harper Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niebuhr, R. (1947). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics (p. 81). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niebuhr, R. (1992). Love and justice: Selections from the shorter writings (p. 25). Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niebuhr, R. (1998). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics (p. 57). Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Outka, G. (1972). Agape: An ethical analysis (pp. 7–54). New Haven and London: Yale University Press (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pew Research Centre. (2017). Religious Diversity Index Scores by Country. Retrieved June 7, 2017, http://www.pewforum.org/2014/04/04/religious-diversity-index-scores-by-country/.

  16. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2005). Compendium of the social doctrine of the church (pp. 294–295). London: Burns & Oates.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramsey, P. (1956). Love and law. In C. W. Kegley & R. W. Bretall, (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr: His religious, social, and political thought, (p. 95). New York: The Macmillan Company

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rasmussen, L. (Ed.). (1989). Reinhold Niebuhr: Theologian of public life (p. 127) London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robertson, D.B. (1992). “Introduction” to Reinhold Niebuhr. Love and justice: Selections from the shorter writings (p. 12). Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. United Nations. (2019). If you want peace & development, work for social justice. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from http://www.un.org/zh/events/socialjusticeday/index.shtml.

  21. Wolterstorff, N. (2011). Justice in love (p. 66). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdamans.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibin Xie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Xie, Z. (2020). How Love Is Possible: A Christian Approach to the Problem of Social Justice in China. In: Xie, Z., Kollontai, P., Kim, S. (eds) Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Social Justice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5081-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics