Skip to main content

Innovation and Firms’ Performance in the Rwandese Manufacturing Industry: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rwandan Economy at the Crossroads of Development

Part of the book series: Frontiers in African Business Research ((FABR))

Abstract

The main objectives of this paper are: (i) determining the factors that support Rwandese manufacturing firms’ engagement in innovative activities; (ii) assessing the effects of innovation decisions on innovation performance of Rwandese manufacturing firms; and (iii) evaluating the impact of innovations on the financial performance of Rwandese manufacturing firms. To address these objectives, the study uses a structural multi-stage framework as proposed by Crépon et al. (Econ Innov New Technol 7(2):115–158 1998). The study uses data from the ‘World Bank Enterprise Survey: Rwanda 2006’ and draws three main conclusions: (i) product innovations are positively linked to process innovations, that is, firms which engage in process innovations also introduce new or improved products in the market; (ii) for innovation output, the ‘international quality recognition’ is not linked to a firm’s engagement with innovations; instead it is linked to the use of technology licensed from foreign firms; and (iii) ‘international quality recognition’ is the main determinant of a firm’s financial performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is known as the CDM method referring to the initials of the authors’ names: Crepon, Duguet, and Mairesse.

  2. 2.

    Series of standards defined and published by the International Organization of Standardization to maintain quality assurance by manufacturing and service firms.

References

  • Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran, V., & Sakthivelan, M. S. (2013). Impact of information technology on entrepreneurship (e-entrepreneurship). Journal of Business Management and Social Sciences Research, 2(2), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneki, C., Giannias, D., & Moustakas, G. (2012). Innovation and economic performance: The case of Greek SMEs. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 12(2), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronwyn, H. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F., & Guzman, A. (2014). Innovation and productivity across Mexican manufacturing firms. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 9(4), 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research and development, innovation and econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the literature. Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effect of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38, 961–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H. (2011). Innovation and productivity. Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2, 167–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legros, D., & Galia, F. (2012). Are innovation and R&D the only sources of firms’ knowledge that increase productivity? An empirical investigation of French manufacturing firms. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2006). On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4/5), 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Using innovation survey for econometric analysis. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of economics and innovation (pp. 1130–1155). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., Mairesse, J., & Robin, S. (2009). Innovation and productivity: A firm-level analysis for French manufacturing and services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998–2000 and 2002–2004). Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, C. S., Gerry, C., Covelo, S., Braga, A., & Braga, V. (2011). Innovation and the performance of Portuguese business: A ‘SURE’ approach. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 10(2/3), 114–128. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINECOFIN (2013). Economic development and poverty reduction strategy II: 2013–2018. Kigali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. H. (2013). Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrar, R. (2014). Innovation in French services compared to manufacturing: An empirical analysis based on CIS4. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 1(13), 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, E. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. In Paris 2005, Sp46. D. B. Audretsch, & M. Keilbach (Eds.) (2006), Entrepreneurship, growth and restructuring (No. 1306). Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1940). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, N., Nhan, N., Giang, P., & Ngoc, N. (2016). The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi. Vietnam. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(2), 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A. (2006). Empirical analysis of entrepreneurship and economic growth (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, A. (2011). Innovation and firm‐level productivity: Econometric evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Working paper series no. 2011-061, UNU-MERIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemplinerova, A., & Hromadkova, F. (2012). Determinants of firm’s innovation. Prague Economic Papers, 4, 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Ndemezo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ndemezo, E., Kayitana, C. (2020). Innovation and Firms’ Performance in the Rwandese Manufacturing Industry: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis. In: Das, G., Johnson, R. (eds) Rwandan Economy at the Crossroads of Development. Frontiers in African Business Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5046-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics