Skip to main content

Determinants of Productivity of Rwandese Food and Beverage Processing Sector: Do Tax Incentives Matter?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Frontiers in African Business Research ((FABR))

Abstract

This study discusses the main determining factors of capacity utilization in the food and beverage manufacturing industries which are likely to be positively affected by tax incentives. It uses data from the manufacturing industry comprehensive survey carried out by the Rwandese Ministry of Trade and Industry (MINICOM) in 2013–14. The model it uses is derived from an augmented Cobb–Douglas production function. The key findings of the study are: (i) in the food processing industry the main factors which undermine firms’ capacity utilization are shortage of raw materials, lack of specialized technologies, poor tax administration and standards; (ii) in the beverage manufacturing industry, drivers of capacity utilization are firm experience (age) and its material-intensive characteristics. Four factors harm the capacity utilization of beverage manufacturing firms—oversize in terms of fixed assets, lack of working capital, standards and insufficient demand. Thus, policymakers in Rwanda need to focus on non-tax measures to boost the food and beverage processing sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Through the SMEs’ development policy, Ministry of Trade and Commerce defines a micro-enterprise as a company having less than 4 employees; a small enterprise between 4 and 30 employees; a medium enterprise between 31 and 100 employees; and a large enterprise having more than 100 employees.

  2. 2.

    EAC is the East African Community, an inter-regional organization comprising Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda (recently, South Sudan joined the Community).

  3. 3.

    According to NISR (2016), the input-output ratio is valued at 82.7% in the beverage and tobacco manufacturing sector, while the average for the entire manufacturing industry is 81.2%.

References

  • Afrooz, A., Rahim, K. B. A., & Edalati, A. (2011). Determinants of productivity in food industries of Iran. Production Management, 38, 4253–4256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, E. M. (2012). Malaysia’s food manufacturing industries productivity determinants. Modern Economy, 3, 444–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, J., Singh, S. P., & Ekanem, E. (2009). Efficiency and productivity changes in the Indian food processing industry: Determinants and policy implications. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 12(1), 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmaja, S. L. (2008). Corporate governance in family firms. Journal Management Bisnis, 1(1), 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, P. (2005). An assessment of South Africa’s investment incentive regime with a focus on the manufacturing sector (ESAU Working Paper no. 14). Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Kokkelenberg, E. C. (1989). Measuring plant capacity, utilisation and technical change: A non-parametric approach. International Economic Review, 30(3), 655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazaki, M., & Liu, Q. (2007). Corporate governance and investment in East Asian firms: Empirical analysis of family-controlled firms. Journal of Asian Economics, 18(1), 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. & Rashidghalam, M. (2016). Labour productivity in Kenyan manufacturing and service industries (Working Paper IZA DP No. 9923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, L. (1968). Production functions and the concept of capacity, in CERUN, Recherches Récentes sur la Fonction de Production. Facultés Universitaires N.-D. de la Paix, Collection ‘Economie Mathématique et Econométrie2, 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kransdorff, M. (2010). Tax incentives and foreign direct investment in South Africa. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Z. (2015). Capacity utilization and productivity analysis in the Canadian food manufacturing industry. M.Sc thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayende, S. (2013). The effects of tax incentives on firm performance: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of Politics and Law, 6(4), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MINICOM. (2012). Rwanda Industrial Survey 2011. Kigali: MINICOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndemezo, E., & Baye, M. F. (2016). Evaluation of redistributive and welfare impacts of indirect taxes reform in Rwanda. In A. Heshmati (Ed.), Poverty and well-being in East Africa: A multi-faceted economic approach. economic studies in inequality, social exclusion and well-being Series, XV (pp. 165–195). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. A. (1989). On the measurement of capacity utilisation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISR. (2011). Establishment census 2011: Analytical report. Kigali: NISR.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISR. (2016). Integrated Business Enterprise Survey report 2014. Kigali: NISR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohaka, J., & Agundu, P. U. C. (2014). Tax incentives for industry synergy in Nigeria: A pragmatic proprietary system advocacy. African Research Review, 6(3), 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsudin, M. N., Yodfiatfinda, M. Z. A., Yusop, Z., & Radam, A. (2011). Evaluation of market competitiveness of SMEs in the Malaysian food processing industry. Journal of Agribusiness Marketing, 4, 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSD (2002). International Standard Industrial Classification of all economic activities (ISIC Rev. 3.1). New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, M. S. I., & Steyn, M. (2014). Investment promotion in South African manufacturing industry: Incentive comparisons with Malaysia and Singapore. AJEMS NS, 17(3), 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodfiatfinda, N. M. S., Zainalabidin, M., Ariff, M. H., Zulkornain, Y., & Alias, R. (2012). The empirical evaluation of productivity growth and efficiency of LSEs in the Malaysian food processing industry. International Food Research Journal, 19(1), 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Ndemezo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ndemezo, E., Ndikubwimana, J.B. (2020). Determinants of Productivity of Rwandese Food and Beverage Processing Sector: Do Tax Incentives Matter?. In: Das, G., Johnson, R. (eds) Rwandan Economy at the Crossroads of Development. Frontiers in African Business Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5046-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics