Skip to main content

Sensitivity Analysis of Weight Coefficients Used in Multiobjective Optimization in Genetic Algorithm Method for Axial Flow Compressor Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the National Aerospace Propulsion Conference

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The sensitivity of the fitness function comprising of weight coefficients assigned to performance variables in a genetic algorithm for meanline design of a transonic compressor is studied. The sum of the weight coefficients is unity. Six performance variables considered are the pressure ratio, efficiency, De-Haller numbers (for rotor and stator), and diffusion factors (for rotor and stator). Based on prior trials, the optimum weight coefficients for pressure ratio and efficiency were considered 0.3 each in the fitness function. Hence the sum of the weight coefficients for the two De-Haller Numbers and two Diffusion Factors considered is 0.4. The values of assigned weights have a significant impact on optimization outcome. Optimized design trials of weight coefficients with higher weightage to DFR resulted in higher efficiency with lower pressure ratio. Optimized design trials with higher weightages to DEHR and DEHS yielded into higher pressure ratio but lower efficiency. The data generated provides a guideline to choose combinations of weight coefficients for fitness functions for several performance requirements of a similar class of compressors for various applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AR:

Blade Aspect Ratio

3-D:

Three-Dimensional

CFD:

Computational Fluid Dynamics

DEHR:

Rotor De-Haller Number

DEHS:

Stator De-Haller Number

DFR:

Rotor Diffusion Factor

DFS:

Stator Diffusion Factor

F:

Fitness function

GA:

Genetic Algorithm

H:

Total enthalpy (J)

K:

Flow blockage factor

N:

Rotational speed rpm

P:

Total Pressure (Pa)

PR:

Total Pressure Ratio

T:

Total temperature (K)

U:

Blade velocity (m/s)

V:

Absolute air velocity (m/s)

W’:

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

w:

Weight coefficient

α:

Swirl

Δ:

Property change (inlet to outlet)

η:

Efficiency

γ:

Ratio of specific heats

σ:

Solidity

φ:

Flow coefficient

ψ:

Loading coefficient

1:

Rotor inlet

2:

Rotor exit

3:

Stator inlet

4:

Stator exit

θ:

Circumferential direction

z:

Axial direction

References

  1. Klaus S, Advanced compressor technology- key success factor for competitiveness in modern aero engines

    Google Scholar 

  2. Escuret JF, Nicoud D, Veysseyre Ph, Recent Advances in Compressor Aerodynamic Design and Analyses. RTO EN-1, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ernesto B (2010) Advances in aerodynamic design of gas turbines compressors (2010) Intechopen.com. Sciyo. ISBN 978-953-307-146-6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tony D, Ivor D (2009) The design of highly loaded axial compressors. In: GT 2009-59291 proceedings of ASME Expo 2009: power for land, sea and air. Orlando, Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vad J, Kwedikha ARA, Horvath CS, Balczo M, Lohasz MM, Regert T (2007) Aerodynamic effects of forward blade skew in axial flow rotors of controlled vortex design. In: Proceeding of IMechE Part A: J. Power Energy 221

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallimore SJ, Bolger JJ, Cumpsty NA, Taylor MJ, Wright PI, Place JM (2002) The Use of Sweep and Dihedral in Multistage Axial Flow Compressor Blading. In: Proceeding of ASME Turbo Expo 2002. Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baljeet K, Balsaraf NB, Ajay P (2013) Study of existing multlistage axial flow compressor design for surge margin improvement. In: Proceeding of ASME 2013 Gas Turbine India conference

    Google Scholar 

  8. Massardo SA, Marini M (1990) Axial flow compressor design optimization: Part I- Pitchline analysis and multivariable objective function influence. Trans ASME J Eng. Power 112

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rao SS, Gupta RS (1990) Optimum design of axial flow gas Turbine stage part I: formulation and analysis of optimization problem. ASME J. Eng. Power 102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Balsaraf NB, Kishore Kumar S (2016) Design of transonic axial flow compressor using genetic algorithm method. In: Proceedings of the asian congress on gas turbines, ACGT2016, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India

    Google Scholar 

  11. Balsaraf NB, Kishore Kumar S (2018) Parametric study of transonic axial flow compressor stage using meanline design. Int J Mech Product Eng Res Develop (IJMPRD)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Members of staff of Lewis Research Center, Aerodynamic design of axial flow compressor (NASA SP-36). National Aeronautics and space administration, Washington, D.C. 20546

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cumpsty N (2004) Compressor Aerodynamics. Krieger Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  14. Biollo R, Benini E, State of art of transonic axial compressors. Chap 2, P25-43. Advances in Gas Turbine Technology. ISBN 978-953-307-146-9, Publisher Sciyo

    Google Scholar 

  15. Balsaraf NB, Kishore Kumar S (2017) Meanline design of multistage transonic axial flow compressor using genetic algorithm method. In: Proceedings of the 1st National Aerospace propulsion conference, NAPC-2017. IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, India

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carlos MF, Peter JF (1993) Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference. San Mateo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic Algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kishore KS, Wake GC (1990) Optimization methods and assessment of genetic algorithm. MUNZ

    Google Scholar 

  19. Balsaraf NB, Kishore Kumar S (2018) Sensitivity of weighing functions in genetic algorithm for efficiency and pressure ratio optimization in transonic axial flow compressor. In: 8th symposium on applied aerothermodynamics and design of aerospace vehicle (SAROD 2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to NB Balsaraf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Balsaraf, N., Kishore Kumar, S. (2021). Sensitivity Analysis of Weight Coefficients Used in Multiobjective Optimization in Genetic Algorithm Method for Axial Flow Compressor Design. In: Mistry, C., Kumar, S., Raghunandan, B., Sivaramakrishna, G. (eds) Proceedings of the National Aerospace Propulsion Conference . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5039-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5039-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5038-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5039-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics