Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation in Collaborative Online International Learning: A Holistic Blend

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radical Solutions and eLearning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

This chapter outlines innovative models and case studies of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) implemented at Coventry University (UK). The institutional drive towards the integration of COIL as part of internationalisation of the curriculum will be outlined, as well as a brief overview of the issues relating to the design and delivery of pedagogies for intercultural online learning. Staff incentives and capability development in facilitating students’ engagement in meaningful intercultural interactions will also be considered. In particular, and through the sharing of case studies, this chapter will discuss the ‘holistic blend’ that COIL can offer. We will illustrate what students stand to gain beyond the immediate action learning of the online dynamic alongside face to face interaction. Such interaction includes the development of critical digital literacy skills, the acquisition of interactional online communication skills, and importantly, openness to knowledge pluralization. It will be argued that consideration must be given to where in the curriculum students should encounter COIL pedagogies and to how to synchronise and merge COIL within the wider course programme. This is to enable students to make sense of COIL as part of their wider internationalised curriculum and not to see it as an add on. Finally, further research recommendations for the design and delivery of COIL, based on the last decade of practices at Coventry University, will be shared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Intercultural communication is used here to refer to the communication amongst learners from diverse backgrounds.

  2. 2.

    Coventry University were also leaders in pre-Internet technologies in the 80s. For example, machine translation (Transit/Tiger TELL) and BBC micros https://www.brownsbfs.co.uk/Product/Thompson-AD/Transit-Tiger/9780340724699.

  3. 3.

    http://onlineinternationallearning.org/projects/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.coventry.ac.uk/primary-news/coventry-continues-to-top-tables-for-international-student-experiences/.

  5. 5.

    https://www.coventry.ac.uk/globalassets/media/global/09-about-us/who-we-are/corporate-strategy-2021.pdf.

  6. 6.

    http://telepresenceintheatre.coventry.domains/awards/coriolanus-online-wins-the-reimagine-education-arts-humanities-gold-award/.

  7. 7.

    Please note that all comments are reproduced verbatim here.

  8. 8.

    A vodcast is a video stored in a digital form (using a mobile device, or other recording equipment) to enable it to be broadcast over the Internet.

References

  • Affouneh, S., & Raba, A. (2017). An emerging model of E-learning in palestine: The case of an Najah National University. Creative Education, 8, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.82016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. IJCALLT, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2011040101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In A. Curai, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 67–80). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beelen, J., Wimpenny, K., & Rubin, J. (2019). Internationalisation in the classroom and questions of congruence: embedding COIL modules in an internationalised curriculum. In P. G. Nixon, V. P. Dennen & R. Rawal (Eds.), Reshaping international teaching and learning: Universities in the information age, London Routledge. Elspeth Jones’ Routledge Series. https://www.routledge.com/Internationalization-in-Higher-Education-Series/bookseries/INTHE.

  • Buhl, M., Andreasen, L. B., & Pushpanadham, K. (2018). Upscaling the number of learners, fragmenting the role of teachers: How do massive open online courses (MOOCs) form new conditions for learning design? International Review of Education, 64(2), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Global Engagement. (2015). Collaborative online international learning. Internal Document. Coventry: Coventry University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2003). A constructivist approach to teaching: Implications in teaching computer networking. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21(2), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortazzi, M., & Lixian, J. (2013). Introduction: Researching cultures of learning. In J. Lixian, & M. Cortazzi. (Eds.), Researching cultures of learning: International perspectives on language learning and Education (pp. 1–17). Palgrave: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale, S. (2009). Space strategies for the new learning landscape. Educause Review, 44(2), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, A., Mortensen, J., & Haberland, H. (2017). The lure of internationalization: paradoxical discourses of transnational student mobility, linguistic diversity and cross-cultural exchange. Higher Education, 73(4), 577–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2003). Knowledge as socially constructed. In M. Gergen & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social construction a reader (pp. 15–17). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2013). Integrating intercultural competence into language learning through technology. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 1–1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Academy. (2014). Internationalising the curriculum. Retrieved from August 30, 2018, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/internationalising_the_curriculum.pdf.

  • Higher Education Academy. (2016). Frameworks: Essential frameworks for enhancing student success: 05. Internationalising higher education. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/higher_education_academy_-_internationalisation_framework_-_210416.pdf.

  • Icaza, R., & Vázquez, R. (2018). Diversity or decolonisation? Researching Diversity at the University of Amsterdam. In G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebrial, & K. Nişancıoğlu (Eds.), Decolonising the University (pp. 108–128). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Y. (2018). Understanding learner autonomy through MOOC-supported blended learning environments: an investigation into Chinese MA ELT students’ beliefs. In M. Orsini-Jones & S. Smith (Eds.), Flipping the blend through MOOCs, MALL and OIL—new directions in CALL (pp. 33–40). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.23.788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E., & Killick, D. (2013). Graduate attributes and the internationalized curriculum: Embedding a global outlook in disciplinary learning outcomes. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315312473655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick, D. (2015). Developing the global student: Higher education in an era of globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, J. (2006). Understanding and developing good practice. London, England: CILT, the National Centre for Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutky, J. (2008). Intercultural competency: Preparing students to be global citizens. Effective Practices for Academic Leaders, 3(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai, A. K., & Lypson, M. L. (2009). Beyond cultural competence: critical consciousness, social justice, and multicultural education. Academic Medicine, 84(6) 782–787. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a42398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile assistance for personal learning on a massive scale. In M. Orsini-Jones & S. Smith (Eds.), Flipping the blend through MOOCs, MALL and OIL—new directions in CALL (pp. 1–7). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.23.784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R., & Meyer, J. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. & O’Dowd, R. (2016). Online intercultural exchange. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E., Cerveró-Carrascosa, A., & Green, C. (2018). A role-reversal model of telecollaborative practice: the student-driven and student-managed FloCo. In M. Orsini-Jones & S. Smith (Eds.), Flipping the blend through MOOCs, MALL and OIL—New directions in CALL (pp. 51–58). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.23.790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. (2018). COIL at Coventry University. Internal document: Coventry University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with failed communication in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M. (2014). Towards a role-reversal model of threshold concept edagogy. In C. O'Mahony, A. Buchanan, M. O'Rourke & B. Higgs, (Eds.) Threshold concepts: From personal practice to communities of practice. Proceedings of the National academy's sixth annual conference and the fourth biennial threshold concepts conference (pp 78–82). Dublin (Ireland): NAIRTL, ISBN: 978-1-906642-59-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M., Lloyd, E., Gazeley, Z., Lopez-Vera, B., & Bescond, G. (2015). Student-driven intercultural awareness raising with MexCo: Agency, autonomy and threshold concepts in a telecollaborative project between the UK and Mexico. In N. Tcherepashenets (Ed.), Globalizing on-line: Telecollaboration, internationalization and social justice (pp. 199–239). New York, USA: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M., Lloyd, E., Cribb, M., Lee, F., Bescond, G., Ennagadi, A., et al. (2017a). Embedding an online intercultural learning project into the curriculum: The trouble with cyberpragmatics. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 7(1), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M., Conde Gafaro, B., & Altamimi, S. (2017b). Integrating a MOOC into the postgraduate ELT curriculum: Reflecting on students’ beliefs with a MOOC blend. In Q. Kan & S. Bax (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom: Researching MOOCs and other innovations (pp. 71–83). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.mooc2016.672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M., Lloyd, E., Lee, F., Bescond, G. & Boylan, R., (2017c). Troublesome multimodal multiliteracy development for global citizenship in international intercultural exchanges: The MexCo project case study. PESTLHE (Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Special Issue: Threshold Concepts and Conceptual Difficulty) (Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 205–228).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M., Conde, B., Borthwick, K, Zou, B., & Ma, W. (2018). BMELTT: Blending MOOCs for English language teacher training, Teaching English, ELT Research Papers 18.02, British Council, J121. Retrieved September 14, 2019, from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/b-meltt-blending-moocs-english-language-teacher-training.

  • Orsini-Jones, M., & Lee, F. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence for global citizenship: Identifying rules of engagement in telecollaboration. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini-Jones, M., Cerveró, A., Alrashidi, A., Matharu, J., & Ni, S. (2019). Students-as-partners in collaborative online international learning (COIL). In C. Simmons (Ed.), Teaching and learning excellence: The coventry way (pp. 85–89). Coventry: Coventry University Higher Education Corporation. Retrieved September, 14, 2019, from https://acdev.orgdev.coventry.domains/index.php?cID=886.

  • Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). New York: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. G., Mulholland, S., Derdall, M., & Hollis, V. (2011). From all perspectives: Opinions of students and teaching staff regarding occupational therapy distance education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (2016). Nautical musings on local and global innovation and change. In E. Jones, R. Coelen, J. Beelen & H. de Wit (Eds.), Global and local internationalization. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandeen, C. (2013). Integrating MOOCs into traditional higher education: The emerging “MOOC 3.0” Era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of E-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin Baden, M. (2010). A practical guide to using second life in higher education, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved August 20, 2019, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.

  • Shulteis, Moore, A., & Sunka, S. (Eds.). (2015). Globally networked teaching in the humanities: Theories and practices. New York (NY): Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villar-Onrubia, D., & Rajpal, B. (2016). Online international learning: Internationalising the curriculum through virtual mobility at Coventry University. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 20(2–3), 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Towards an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, H., & Smith, R. (2018). Thinking globally, working locally: Employability and internationalization at home. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(3), 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimpenny, K., & Lewis, L. (2015). Preparation for an uncertain world: Professional artistry and durability in mental health occupational therapy practice preparation. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(2), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/V45N2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimpenny, K., Lewis, L., Gordon, I., Roe, S., & Waters, S. (2016). Preparation for an uncertain world: International curriculum development for mental health occupational therapy, World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2016.1161960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimpenny, K., Adefila, A., & DeWinter, A. (2018). JOVITAL: A needs analysis report contextualising the state of the art in international online teaching and learning, with particular attention to the jordanian case. Coventry: Coventry University. https://dx.doi.org/10.18552/jovital/2018/001.

  • Wimpenny, K., Beelen, J., & King, V. (2019). Academic development to support the internationalization of the curriculum (IoC): A qualitative research synthesis. International Journal of Academic Development. https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/KAVIXPPGZ88AHPBFXWXK/full?target=10.1080/1360144X.2019.1691559.

  • Wimpenny, K., Knowles, R., Ramsey, C., & Speculand, J. (2018). #3CityLink: Disrupting learning through a translocal art pedagogy exchange project. The International Journal of Art & Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12193, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jade.12193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y.-F. (2013). Exploring students’ language awareness through intercultural communication in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Huiju, Y., Cen, S.-J., & Huang, R. (2014). Strategies for smooth and effective cross-cultural online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 208–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimitat, C. (2008). Student perceptions of the internationalisation of the undergraduate curriculum. In L. Dunn & M. Wallace (Eds.), Teaching in transnational higher education: Enhancing learning for offshore international students (pp. 135–147). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Global Education: Education and Attainment Research Centre, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Katherine Wimpenny

  2. School of Humanities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Marina Orsini-Jones

Authors
  1. Katherine Wimpenny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Orsini-Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Wimpenny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Innovation & Technology in Education (UNIR iTED), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Logroño, Spain

    Daniel Burgos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wimpenny, K., Orsini-Jones, M. (2020). Innovation in Collaborative Online International Learning: A Holistic Blend. In: Burgos, D. (eds) Radical Solutions and eLearning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4952-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4952-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4951-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4952-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation