Skip to main content

Applicability of Rule of Mixtures to Estimate Effective Properties of Nanocomposite Materials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering 2019

Abstract

A rule of mixtures is employed and modified to examine the effective elastic properties of a unidirectional composite lamina reinforced with nanostructure-hybrid fibers. Such fiber system is designated when nanostructure such as nanowires or carbon nanotubes are radially grown on the surface of primary fiber. When combines with matrix, a complex three-phase composite with enhanced elastic properties is expected. Herein, the applicability of this simple micromechanics method to reliably estimate the effective properties of such advanced novel composite material is assessed. The results demonstrated that the method is capable of modeling the effects on elastic properties of a composite due to the presence of nanostructure. However, in light of published experimental data and other micromechanics results, the proposed method is found to be at best, applicable for a composite that has a very low fiber volume fraction only except when an axial Young’ modulus is predicted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sager RJ, Klein PJ, Lagoudas DC, Zhang Q, Liu J, Dai L, Baur JW (2009) Effect of carbon nanotubes on the interfacial shear strength of T650 carbon in an epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Tech 69:898–9004

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lin Y, Ehlert G, Sodano HA (2009) Increased interface strength in carbon fiber composites through a ZnO nanowire interphase. Adv Funct Mater 19(16):2654–2660

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galan U, Lin Y, Ehlert GJ, Sodano HA (2011) Effect of ZnO nanowire morphology on the interfacial strength of nanowire coated carbon fibers. Compos Sci Tech 71(7):946–954

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steiner SA, Li R, Wardle BL (2013) Circumventing the mechanochemical origins of strength loss in synthesis of hierarchical carbon fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(11):4892–4903

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hart AHC, Koizumi R, Hamel J, Owuor PS, Ito Y, Ozden S (2017) Velcro-inspired SiC fuzzy fibers for aerospace applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(15):17342–17350

    Google Scholar 

  6. Du Y, Fu C, Gao Y, Liu Y, Xing L, Zhao F (2017) Carbon fibers/ZnO nanowires hybrid nanogenerator based on an interface insulating barrier. RSC Advan 7:21452–21458

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nayarana KJ, Burela RG (2018) A review of recent research on multifunctional composite materials and structures with their applications. Mater Today Proc 5(2,1):5580–5590

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, Zhang C, Zhang X (2018) Design, fabrication and application of multi-scale, multi-functional nanostructured carbon fibers. In: Khanna, R., Cayumil, R. (eds.) Recent Developments in the field of carbon fibers. Intech Open, pp 33–49

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bezzon VDN, Montaheiro TLA, Menezes BRC, Ribas RG, Righetti VAN, Rodrigues KF, Thim GP (2019) Carbon nanostructure-based sensors: A brief review on recent advances. Adv Mater Sci Eng 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sebastian J, Schehl N, Bouchard M, Boehle M, Li L, Lagounov A, Kafdi K (2014) Health monitoring of structural composites with embedded carbon nanotubes coated glass fiber sensors. Carbon 66:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ray, M.C.: Smart fuzzy fiber-reinforced piezoelectric composites. In: Meguid, S.A (ed.) Advances in Nanocomposites: Modeling, characterization and applications, pp. 126–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malakooti MH, Patterson BA, Hwang HS, Sodano HA (2016) ZnO nanowire interface for high strength multifunctional composites with embedded energy harvesting. Energy Environ Sci 9(2):634–643

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel IM, Ishai O (2005) Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barberro EJ (2011) Introduction to composite materials design, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aboudi J, Arnold S, Bednarcyk B (2012) Micromechanics of composite materials. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson RF (2016) Principles of composite materials mechanics, 4th edn. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vasiliev VV, Morozov EV (2013) Advanced mechanics of composite materials and structural elements. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eshelby JD (1956) The continuum theory of lattice defects. Solid States Phys 3:79–144

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christensen RM, Lo KH (1979) Solutions for effective shear effective properties in three phase sphere and cylinder models. J Mech Phys Solids 27(4):315–330

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Christensen RM (2005) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christensen RM (1990) A critical evaluations of a class of micromechanics models. J Mech Phys Solids 38(3):379–404

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benveniste Y (2008) Revisiting the generalized self-consistent scheme: clarification of some aspects and a new formulation. J Mech Phys Solids 56(10):2984–3002

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Gusev AA, Lurie SA (2009) Loss amplification effect in multiphase materials with viscoelastic interfaces. Macromolecules 42:5372–5377

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lurie S, Minhat M (2014) Application of generalized self-consistent method to predict the effective properties of bristled fiber composites. Composites B 61:26–40

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lurie S, Minhat M, Tuchkova N (2015) Estimations of effective dynamics properties of bristled fiber composite materials based on a self-consistent Eshelby method. J Eng Mech 95(1):7–29

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Lurie S, Minhat M, Tuchkova N, Soliaev J (2014) On remarkable loss amplification mechanism in fiber reinforced laminated composite materials. Appl Compos Mater 21(1):179–196

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ehlert GJ (2012) Development of a zinc oxide nanowire interphase for enhanced structural composites. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are indebted to UniKL Center/Section of Research and Innovation for the publication grant and support. Special appreciation to Dr. Sergey Lurie and MAI for continuous support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammed Fadzli Ismail .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The details of mathematical modeling of the ROM model modified for a three orthotropic phase lamina that yields final expressions for the four effective properties shown in Eq. (2) are derived here. Referring to Fig. 2, the constitutive equations for the effective composite or lamina [18] are given as

$$ \begin{aligned} & \varepsilon_{3} = \sigma_{3} /E_{3}^{*} {-}v_{13}^{*} \sigma_{1} /E_{1}^{*} , \\ & \varepsilon_{1} = \sigma_{1} /E_{1}^{*} {-}v_{31}^{*} \sigma_{3} /E_{3}^{*} , \\ & \gamma_{31} = \tau_{31} /G_{31}^{*} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(3)

where E*3—effective axial Young’s modulus, E*1—effective transverse Young’s modulus, G*31  =  G*31—effective shear modulus, σ3,1—normal stresses in axial and transverse direction experienced by the lamina respectively, ε3,1—normal strain in axial and transverse direction respectively, τ31—shear stress, γ31—shear strain, ν*31—effective major Poisson’s ratio and ν*13—effective minor Poisson’s ratio obeying the following general symmetry

$$ E_{3} \nu_{13} = E_{1} \nu_{31} . $$
(4)

The volume fraction of every constituent is given as follows

$$ \upsilon_{f,i,m} = w_{f,i,m} /w $$
(5)

and as before, \( \upsilon_{f} + \upsilon_{i} + \upsilon_{m} = \upsilon = 1 \) where υ designates total volume fraction and w is the total width of a lamina and with subscript f, i or m, they represent the quantity for fiber, interphase and matrix phase respectively. Finally, the constitutive equations for every constituent, which are similar to the relations given for lamina in Eq. (3) but have been rearranged with the aid of Eq. (4), can be written as

$$ \begin{aligned} & \varepsilon_{3}^{f,i,m} = (\sigma_{3}^{f,i,m} {-} \, v_{31}^{f,i,m} \sigma_{1}^{f,i,m} )/E_{3}^{f,i,m} , \\ & \varepsilon_{1}^{f,i,m} = (\sigma_{1}^{f,i,m} {-} \, v_{13}^{f,i,m} \sigma_{3}^{f,i,m} )/E_{1}^{f,i,m} , \\ & \gamma_{31}^{f,i,m} = \tau_{31}^{f,i,m} /G_{31}^{f,i,m} . \\ \end{aligned} $$
(6)

Next, we shall define the states of stresses and strains of the constituents under specific loading conditions applied to the lamina. When a lamina is axially loaded in tension, the iso-strain state condition requires every constituent or strip to experience uniform strain as the lamina, which we have

$$ \varepsilon_{3} = \varepsilon_{3}^{f} = \varepsilon_{3}^{i} = \varepsilon_{3}^{m} $$
(7)

and the apparent resultant stress of a lamina is distributed accordingly between the constituents, which is given as follow

$$ \sigma_{3} w = \sigma_{3}^{f} w_{f} + \sigma_{3}^{i} w_{i} + \sigma_{3}^{m} w_{m} . $$
(8)

In transverse loading condition, iso-stress condition requires all strips to experience equal amount of apparent stress experienced by the lamina, which gives us

$$ \sigma_{1} = \sigma_{1}^{f} = \sigma_{1}^{i} = \sigma_{1}^{m} . $$
(9)

Furthermore, the apparent elongation of a lamina is basically the sum of fiber, interphase and matrix strip’s elongation, e.g. \( \Delta w = \Delta w_{f} + \Delta w_{i} + \Delta w_{m} \). Introducing transverse strains for the lamina and also for every constituent: \( \varepsilon_{1} = \Delta w/w \), \( \varepsilon_{1}^{f} = \Delta w^{f} /w^{f} \), \( \varepsilon_{1}^{i} = \Delta w^{i} /w^{i} \) and \( \varepsilon_{1}^{m} = \Delta w^{m} /w^{m} \), the apparent elongation of a lamina can now be written as

$$ \varepsilon_{1} w = \varepsilon_{1}^{f} w^{f} + \varepsilon_{1}^{i} w^{i} + \varepsilon_{1}^{m} w^{m} . $$
(10)

Finally, similar assumptions employed in the transverse loading condition are applicable to shear loading case, in which the shear stresses of lamina and its constituents are found to be

$$ \tau_{31} = \tau_{31}^{f} = \tau_{31}^{i} = \tau_{31}^{m} $$
(11)

while the shear strain of a lamina are defined as

$$ \gamma_{31} w = \gamma_{31}^{f} w^{f} + \gamma_{31}^{i} w^{i} + \gamma_{31}^{m} w^{m} . $$
(12)

Once the states of stresses and strains are properly defined, we now proceed to the determination of effective properties of the lamina. First, we wish to determine the expression for an effective axial Young’s modulus. Considering Eqs. (7), (9) and (11), the constitutive equations for every constituent given in Eq. (6) can be reduced to the following form

$$ \begin{aligned} & \varepsilon_{3} = (\sigma_{3}^{f} {-}v_{31}^{f} \sigma_{1} )/E_{3}^{f} ,\varepsilon_{3} = (\sigma_{3}^{i} {-}v_{31}^{i} \sigma_{1} )/E_{3}^{i} ,\varepsilon_{3} = (\sigma_{3}^{m} {-}v_{31}^{m} \sigma_{1} )/E_{3}^{m} , \\ & \varepsilon_{1}^{f} = (\sigma_{1} {-}v_{13}^{f} \sigma_{3}^{f} )/E_{1}^{f} ,\varepsilon_{1}^{i} = (\sigma_{1} {-}v_{13}^{i} \sigma_{3}^{i} )/E_{1}^{i} ,\varepsilon_{1}^{m} = (\sigma_{1} {-}v_{13}^{m} \sigma_{3}^{m} )/E_{1}^{m} , \\ & \gamma_{31}^{f} = \tau_{31} /G_{31}^{f} ,\gamma_{31}^{i} = \tau_{31} /G_{31}^{i} ,\gamma_{31}^{m} = \tau_{31} /G_{31}^{m} . \\ \end{aligned} $$
(13)

The three relations in the first row of Eq. (13) can be rewritten to define the axial stress experienced by every strip, e.g.

$$ \sigma_{3}^{f} = \varepsilon_{3} E_{3}^{f} + v_{31}^{f} \sigma_{1} ,\sigma_{3}^{i} = \varepsilon_{3} E_{3}^{i} + v_{31}^{i} \sigma_{1} ,\sigma_{3}^{m} = \varepsilon_{3} E_{3}^{m} + v_{31}^{m} \sigma_{1} . $$
(14)

Next, Eq. (8) can be rewritten with the aid of Eq. (5) giving us

$$ \sigma_{3} = \sigma_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + \sigma_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + \sigma_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} . $$
(15)

It is in our intention to express ε3 in terms of σ3 and σ1 and this is achieved by substituting Eq. (14) into (15), which we have

$$ \begin{aligned} \varepsilon_{3} & = \sigma_{3} /\left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right) \\ & \quad {-}\left[ {\left( {v_{31}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + v_{31}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + v_{31}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)/\left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)} \right]\sigma_{1} . \\ \end{aligned} $$
(16)

Here, we are about to get the desired expression of an effective axial Young’s modulus. Equating Eq. (16) with the first expression of Eq. (3), the following relations can be obtained

$$ E_{3}^{*} = E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} , $$
(17)
$$ v_{13}^{*} /E_{1}^{*} = \left( {v_{31}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + v_{31}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + v_{31}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)/\left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right). $$
(18)

As we can see, Eq. (17) defines the effective axial Young’s modulus for our lamina.

Next, we wish to determine the expression for an effective transverse Young’s modulus. Using Eq. (5), we can rewrite Eq. (10) as

$$ \varepsilon_{1} = \varepsilon_{1}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + \varepsilon_{1}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + \varepsilon_{1}^{m} \upsilon_{m} . $$
(19)

Substituting the three equations shown in the second row of Eq. (13) into (19) and taking into account Eq. (14) together with the first row relations of Eq. (13) as well as both Eqs. (17) and (18), we will arrive to a relation that expresses ε1 in terms of σ1 and σ3 and comparing that newly obtained relation with the second expression of Eq. (3), we receive

$$ \begin{aligned} 1/E_{1}^{*} & = \upsilon_{f} /E_{1}^{f} + \upsilon_{i} /E_{1}^{i} + \upsilon_{m} /E_{1}^{m} \\ & \quad {-}\left[ {\left( {E_{3}^{f} v_{31}^{i} + E_{3}^{i} v_{31}^{f} } \right)\left( {E_{1}^{f} v_{13}^{i} + E_{1}^{i} v_{13}^{f} } \right)E_{1}^{m} \upsilon_{f} \upsilon_{i} } \right]/\left[ {E_{1}^{f} E_{1}^{i} E_{1}^{m} \left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)} \right] \\ & \quad {-}\left[ {\left( {E_{3}^{f} v_{31}^{m} + E_{3}^{m} v_{31}^{f} } \right)\left( {E_{1}^{f} v_{13}^{m} + E_{1}^{m} v_{13}^{f} } \right)E_{1}^{i} \upsilon_{f} \upsilon_{m} } \right]/\left[ {E_{1}^{f} E_{1}^{i} E_{1}^{m} \left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)} \right] \\ & \quad {-}\left[ {\left( {E_{3}^{i} v_{31}^{m} + E_{3}^{m} v_{31}^{i} } \right)\left( {E_{1}^{i} v_{13}^{m} + E_{1}^{m} v_{13}^{i} } \right)E_{1}^{f} \upsilon_{i} \upsilon_{m} } \right]/\left[ {E_{1}^{f} E_{1}^{i} E_{1}^{m} \left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)} \right] \\ \end{aligned} $$
(20)

and

$$ v_{31}^{*} /E_{3}^{*} = \left( {v_{31}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + v_{31}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + v_{31}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right)/\left( {E_{3}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + E_{3}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + E_{3}^{m} \upsilon_{m} } \right). $$
(21)

Here, Eq. (20) represents the needed expression for an effective transverse Young’s modulus. Based on our computations with entire possible range of fiber volume fraction, the results indicated that the last three terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (20) can safely be ignored and thus, giving us the simplified and familiar expression of the said modulus such as shown in Eq. (2) earlier.

Next, we shall define the expression for an effective major Poisson’s ratio and this is easily received by substituting Eqs. (17) into (21), which we have

$$ v_{31}^{*} = v_{31}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + v_{31}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + v_{31}^{m} \upsilon_{m} . $$
(22)

On the other hand, to determine the expression for effective shear modulus, we first substitute Eqs. (5) into (12) and obtain

$$ \gamma_{31} = \gamma_{31}^{f} \upsilon_{f} + \gamma_{31}^{i} \upsilon_{i} + \gamma_{31}^{m} \upsilon_{m} . $$
(23)

Then, having the last relations of Eq. (13) substituted into (23) and subsequently equating it with last row expression of Eq. (3), we receive

$$ 1/G_{31}^{*} = \upsilon_{f} /G_{31}^{f} + \upsilon_{i} /G_{31}^{i} + \upsilon_{m} /G_{31}^{m} . $$
(24)

Thus, Eqs. (22) and (24) completes our tasks in determining the expressions for all effective moduli of the lamina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodzi, M.L.M., Ismail, M.F., Minhat, M. (2020). Applicability of Rule of Mixtures to Estimate Effective Properties of Nanocomposite Materials. In: Rajendran, P., Mazlan, N., Rahman, A., Suhadis, N., Razak, N., Abidin, M. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering 2019 . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4756-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4756-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4755-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4756-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics