Abstract
Passive flow control techniques are the advanced boundary surface modifiers to improve the aerodynamic performance by keeping the flow attached. The overall aim of this study is to implement semi-circular grooves over the NACA 2412 wing at various orientations, to keep the flow attached along with the relative aerodynamic performance changes of baseline and groove wing. Numerically simulation over a Low Aspect Ratio wing of order 1 with variant angle of attack, at an operating velocity of 30 m/s, and Re of 4.4 × 105 is presented. Grooves over a baseline wing disturb the flow behavior, thereby creates turbulence by producing rotating small eddies. These rotating vortices keep the flow attached for longer time by re-attaching the separated flow with enhancement in L/D characteristics. Variant of longitudinal grooves has been employed over the wingspan at different x/c location (1) near leading edge (0.2C), (2) near trailing edge (0.8C), (3) mid-span (0.5C), (4) triplet location (0.2C, 0.5C, 0.8C). The models are designed using CATIA V5R20, and ANSYS Fluent helps to simulate the flow behavior, vortex development and aerodynamic performance difference between models. From the simulation study, it is clearly understood; the baseline wing shows massive boundary flow separation on the suction side of the wing beyond 14° AOA with immediate stalling. The presence of these longitudinal grooves enhances the stalling characteristics by keeping the flow attached up to 18° AOA. In all the optimized wing models, the L/D shows at least 0.05% improvement compared to baseline wing. However, the aerodynamic characteristics show pronounced results in the case of the triplet groove wing. It proves that creating roughness over smooth wing shifts the stalling angle and also improves the lift in that region with minor turbulence drag reduction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mahesh Babu T, Sairaja D, Chandrasekar A, Sreenathreddy S (2015) Computational analysis of different shapes of dimple on wing. Appl Mech Mater 766:1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.1061
Ghazali M, Harun Z, Wan Ghopa W, Abbas A (2016) Computational fluid dynamic simulation on NACA 0026 airfoil with V-groove riblets. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 6(4):529–533. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.6.4.901
Guha T, Fernandez E, Kumar R (2013) Effect of longitudinal ridges on the aerodynamic characteristics of an airfoil. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the New Horizons forum and aerospace exposition, grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, 7–10 Jan 2013. p 489. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-489
Shan H, Jiang L, Liu C, Love M, Maines B (2008) Numerical study of passive and active flow separation control over a NACA0012 airfoil. Comput Fluids 37(8):975–992
Merryisha S, Parvathy R (2019) Experimental and CFD analysis survey of surface modifiers on aircraft wing. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci
Saravi SS, Cheng K (2013) A review of drag reduction by riblets and micro-textures in the turbulent boundary layers. Eur Sci J 9(33)
Ganesh N, Arunvinthan S, Pillai SN (2019) Effect of surface blowing on aerodynamic characteristics of tubercled straight wing. Chin J Aeronaut 32(5):1111–1120
Yousefi K, Saleh R (2015) Three-dimensional suction flow control and suction jet length optimization of NACA 0012 wing. Meccanica 50(6):1481–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0100-9
Mariotti A, Buresti G, Salvetti MV (2018) Flow separation control and drag reduction for a two-dimensional boat-tailed bluff body through transverse grooves. In: ASME 2018 5th joint US-European fluids engineering division summer meeting, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 15–20 July 2018. American society of mechanical engineers, pp V001T008A007–V001T008A007
Viswanath P (2002) Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(6–7):571–600
Hood MJ (1939) The effects of surface waviness and of rib stitching on wing drag. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Langley Manorial Aeronautical Laboratory, Washington
Bacher EV, Smith CA (1985) Combined visualization-anemometry study of the turbulent drag reducing mechanisms of triangular micro-groove surface modifications. In: Shear flow control conference, Boulder, Colorado. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronaoutics, p 548, 12–14 Mar 1985
Bloch D, Mueller T (1986) Effects of distributed grit roughness on separation and transition on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. In: 4th applied aerodynamics conference, San Diego, CA, 9–11 June 1986. p 1788. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-1788
Walsh M, Weinstein L (1979) Drag and heat-transfer characteristics of small longitudinally ribbed surfaces. AIAA J 17(7):770–771. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61216
Chakroun W, Al-Mesri I, Al-Fahad S (2004) Effect of surface roughness on the aerodynamic characteristics of a symmetrical airfoil. Wind Eng 28(5):547–564
Buckholz R (1986) The functional role of wing corrugations in living systems. J Fluids Eng 108(1):93–97
Seror S, Rubin T, Peigin S, Epstein B (2005) Implementation and validation of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model in parallel environment. J Aircraft 42(1):179–188. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4009
Islam MT, Arefin AM, Masud M, Mourshed M (2018) The effect of Reynolds number on the performance of a modified NACA 2412 Airfoil. In: AIP conference proceedings, December 2018, vol 1. AIP Publishing, p 040015. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.504432
Zakaria MY, Ibrahim MM, Ragab S, Hajj MR (2018) A computational study of vortex shedding from a NACA-0012 airfoil at high angles of attack. Int J Aerodyn 6(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAD.2018.10010814
Manni L, Nishino T, Delafin P-L (2016) Numerical study of airfoil stall cells using a very wide computational domain. Comput Fluids 140:260–269
Lopes A (2016) A 2D software system for expedite analysis of CFD problems in complex geometries. Comput Appl Eng Educ 24(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21668
Ogawa H, Babinsky H, Pätzold M, Lutz T (2008) Shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction control using three-dimensional bumps for transonic wings. AIAA J 46
Puri K, Laufer M, Müller-Vahl H, Greenblatt D, Frankel SH (2018) Computations of active flow control via steady blowing over a NACA-0018 airfoil: implicit LES and RANS validated against experimental data. In: 2018 AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 8–12 Jan 2018. p 0792. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0792
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Merryisha, S., Rajendran, P. (2020). Aircraft Wing Aerodynamic Efficiency Improvement Using Longitudinal Spanwise Grooves. In: Rajendran, P., Mazlan, N., Rahman, A., Suhadis, N., Razak, N., Abidin, M. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering 2019 . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4756-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4756-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4755-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4756-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)