Abstract
The introductory chapter outlines the primary themes of the book and identifies the key theories of materiality that inform the work. In attempting to develop a comprehensive analysis of urban materiality, I argue that no single theoretical perspective will suffice, and that a range of diverse theories is integral to such a study, diverting from the singular theoretical approaches adopted in many academic studies of materiality. Accordingly, I consider a broad range of diverse theories that are particularly salient to this investigation, identifying their strengths and limitations. First, I consider Marxian notions of urban metabolism, the textual and representational focus on objects inspired by the cultural turn and the influential actor-network accounts that focus on the relationalities of materials. I subsequently explore assemblage theories before considering new materialist theories of urban vitalism. I then discuss phenomenology and post-phenomenology and further contextualise the account by identifying useful areas of geological thinking to emphasise that stone is entangled with the Anthropocene. I conclude by drawing on object-oriented ontologies to underline the limitations of all these theories and acknowledge the many unknowable, ineffable and inexplicable elements of materiality that we confront.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B., & Wylie, J. (2009). On Geography and Materiality. Environment and Planning A, 41(2), 318–335.
Ash, J., & Simpson, P. (2016). Geography and Post-phenomenology. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 48–66.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke: Durham, NC.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Boivin, N. (2004). From Veneration to Exploitation: Human Engagement with the Mineral World. In N. Boivin & M. Owoc (Eds.), Soils, Stones and Symbols: Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World. London: UCL.
Brierley, G. (2010). Landscape Memory: The Imprint of the Past on Contemporary Landscape Forms and Processes. Area, 42(1), 76–85.
Brumm, A. (2014). An Axe to Grind: Symbolic Considerations of Stone Axe Use in Ancient Australia. In N. Boivin & M. Owoc (Eds.), Soils, Stones and Symbols: Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World. London: UCL.
Cathcart, R. (2011). Anthropic Rock: A Brief History. History of Geo-and Space Sciences, 2(1), 57–74.
Cipolla, C. (2018). Earth Flows and Lively Stone: What Differences Does ‘Vibrant’ Matter Make? Archaeological Dialogues, 25(1), 49–70.
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and Across Cultures. London: Routledge.
Clark, N., Gormally, A., & Tuffen, H. (2018). Speculative Volcanology: Time, Becoming, and Violence in Encounters with Magma. Environmental Humanities, 10(1), 273–294.
Cohen, J. (2015). Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cook, I. (2004). Follow the Thing: Papaya. Antipode, 36(4), 642–664.
Cosgrove, D., Daniels, S., & Baker, A. (Eds.). (1988). The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
Dittmer, J. (2014). Geopolitical Assemblages and Complexity. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 385–401.
Duncan, J. (2005). The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edgeworth, M. (2016). Grounded Objects: Archaeology and Speculative Realism. Archaeological Dialogues, 23(1), 93–113.
Fowler, C., & Harris, O. (2015). Enduring Relations: Exploring a Paradox of New Materialism. Journal of Material Culture, 20(2), 127–148.
Gandy, M. (2018). Cities in Deep Time. City, 22(1), 96–105.
Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006). Urban Political Ecology: Politicizing the Production of Urban Natures. In N. Heynen, M. Kaika, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials. World, 44, 1–25.
Instone, L. (2019). Making the Geologic with Urban Nature Cultures: Life and Nonlife on the Victorian Volcanic Plains Grasslands of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Geoforum, 106, 363–369.
Kärrholm, M. (2013). Building Type Production and Everyday Life: Rethinking Building Types Through Actor-Network Theory and Object-Oriented Philosophy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(6), 1109–1124.
Latham, A., & McCormack, D. (2004). Moving Cities: Rethinking the Materialities of Urban Geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 28(6), 701–724.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macfarlane, R. (2019). Underland: A Deep Time Journey. London: Hamish Hamilton.
McFarlane, C. (2011). The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(4), 649–671.
Merriman, P. (2019). Molar and Molecular Mobilities: The Politics of Perceptible and Imperceptible Movements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(1), 65–82.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2007). The Merleau-Ponty Reader. Boston: Northwestern University Press.
Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology. Social Studies of Science, 24, 641–671.
Moss, S. (2018). Whinstone, Northumberland. In M. Smalley (Ed.), Cornerstones: Subterranean Writings. Little Toller, Dorset: Little Toller Books.
Müller, M., & Schurr, C. (2016). Assemblage Thinking and Actor-Network Theory: Conjunctions, Disjunctions, Cross-Fertilisations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 217–229.
Otter, C. (2010). Locating Matter: The Place of Materiality in Urban History. In T. Bennett & P. Joyce (Eds.), Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn. London: Routledge.
Rancière, J. (2009). Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Seamon, D. (1979). A Geography of the Lifeworld. London: Croom Helm.
Shaw, I. (2012). Towards an Evental Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 613–627.
Smalley, M. (2018). Introduction. In M. Smalley (Ed.), Cornerstones: Subterranean Writings. Little Toller, Dorset: Little Toller Books.
Stewart, S. (1999). Prologue: From the Museum of Touch. In M. Kwint, C. Breward, & J. Aynsley (Eds.), Material Memories: Designs and Evocation. Oxford: Berg.
Strang, V. (2014). Fluid Consistencies: Material Relationality in Human Engagements with Water. Archaeological Dialogues, 21(2), 150–153.
Taçon, P. (2004). Ochre, Clay, Stone and Art. In N. Boivin & M. Owoc (Eds.), Soils, Stones and Symbols: Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World. London: UCL.
Tilly, C. (2004). The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology. Oxford: Berg.
Tsing, A. (2013). Sorting Out Commodities: How Capitalist Value Is Made Through Gifts. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 21–43.
Wylie, J. (2006). Depths and Folds: On Landscape and the Gazing Subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(4), 519–535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edensor, T. (2020). Thinking About Urban Materiality. In: Stone. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4650-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4650-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4649-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4650-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)