Skip to main content

AI Technology and Personalized Learning Design—Uncovering Unconscious Incompetence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radical Solutions and Learning Analytics

Abstract

We posit that while much is made about new technologies, without application of sound learning science principles, the benefits of the new technology may not be realized. This may lead to mis-inferences when conducting evaluations of new technologies where the assumption is that the technology didn’t work when the issue actually related to intervention design or implementation. Using data from a large scale role out of a cutting edge AI-powered personalized learning technology, we explore these issues empirically and also uncover evidence of Maslow’s unconscious incompetence where learners perceive they have more expertise than the demonstrate. Finally, we create a model to compare the personalized learning approaches to a standard asynchronous learning approach applying sound learning science principles and find significant mean performance increase but also large increases in variance with respect to time to completion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al‐Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology46(6), 1133–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alharbi, H., & Sandhu, K. (2018). Robust data findings of E-learning analytics recommender systems and their impact on system adoption for student experiences. International Journal of Organizational and Collective Intelligence (IJOCI), 8(3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basham, J. D., Hall, T. E., Carter, R. A., Jr., & Stahl, W. M. (2016). An operationalized understanding of personalized learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(3), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1–18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (1970). Towards an educational production function. In Education, income, and human capital (pp. 11–70). NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F. (1997). From unconscious incompetence to unconscious competence. Adults Learning (England), 9(2), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, G., & Slatyer, H. (2002). Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 369–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, M. A., Rassen, J. A., & Schneeweiss, S. (2010). Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 19(6), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the internet. In Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 239–280). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1968). Equality of educational opportunity. Integrated Education, 6(5), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, U. (2017). How to teach employees skills they don’t know they lack. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from https://hbr.org/2017/09/how-to-teach-employees-skills-they-dont-know-they-lack.

  • Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In Measuring capital in the new economy (pp. 11–46). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, J., Kommers, P. A., De Brock, B., & Tolboom, J. (2016). The influence of prior knowledge and viewing repertoire on learning from video. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, A. J., Wardlow, L., McKnight, K., & O’Malley, K. (2015). Educational technology: A review of the integration, resources, and effectiveness of technology in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015, April). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. In The international scientific conference eLearning and software for education (Vol. 1, p. 133). “Carol I” National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2008). Education production functions. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1–8, 1645–1648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, M., Petrusa, E., Axelsson, C., Wongsirimeteekul, P., et al. (2018). An exploratory study of a novel adaptive e-Learning board review product helping candidates prepare for certification examinations. MedEdPublish, 7(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.9999162.1.

  • Hess, F. M., & Saxberg, B. (2013). Breakthrough leadership in the digital age: Using learning science to reboot schooling. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2018). Understanding student engagement in large-scale open online courses: A machine learning facilitated analysis of student’s reflections in 18 highly rated MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning19(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, M. B. (2017). Now trending: Personalized learning. Education Next17(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 121–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launer, J. (2010). Unconscious incompetence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, E. M., Campbell, S. M., Baker, H., Ali, R., Brawley, D., & Crisp, J. (2013). The impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M., Jamison, D. T., & Radner, R. (1976). Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production. In Education as an industry (pp. 149–198). NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2000). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 4). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majuri, J., Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2018). Gamification of education and learning: A review of empirical literature. In Proceedings of the 2nd international GamiFIN conference, GamiFIN 2018. CEUR-WS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manthey, D., & Fitch, M. (2012). Stages of competency for medical procedures. The Clinical Teacher, 9(5), 317–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Y., Tan, G. H., Liau, A. K., Lau, S., & Chua, B. L. (2013). The roles of teacher efficacy in instructional innovation: Its predictive relations to constructivist and didactic instruction. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, J. L. B., Kubben, P. L., de Albuquerque, L. A. F., Batalini, F., de Carvalho, G. T. C., & de Sousa, A. A. (2015). E-learning for neurosurgeons: Getting the most from the new web tools. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, 10(1), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1979). Paul Douglas’s measurement of production functions and marginal productivities. Journal of Political Economy87(5, Part 1), 923–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheahan, G., Reznick, R., Klinger, D., Flynn, L., & Zevin, B. (2019). Comparison of personal video technology for teaching and assessment of surgical skills. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 11(3), 328–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorour, S. E., Goda, K., & Mine, T. (2017). Comment data mining to estimate student performance considering consecutive lessons. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spratt, S. J., Wiersma, G., Glazier, R., & Pan, D. (2017). Exploring the evidence in evidence-based acquisition. The Serials Librarian, 72(1–4), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1321901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sungkur, R. K., Antoaroo, M. A., & Beeharry, A. (2016). Eye tracking system for enhanced learning experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1785–1806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urso, P., & Rodrigues Fisher, L. (2015). Education technology to service a new population of eLearners. International Journal of Childbirth Education30(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. A. N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. Tesol Quarterly, 44(4), 647–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, L. M., Lynch, D. E., Sparangis, T., & Haj-Mohamadi, S. (2018). Dramatic arts pedagogy & online learning: Potential tool for learning in a knowledge society?

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharia, Z., Papaevripidou, M., & Pavlou, I. (2019, July). Could simulations replace physical manipulatives in early science education? In Global learn (pp. 214–223). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X., Gao, Y., Hou, S., & Peng, S. (2015). Real-time multi-scale tracking via online RGB-D multiple instance learning. JSW, 10(11), 1235–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doug Lynch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lynch, D., Christensen, U.J., Howe, N.J. (2020). AI Technology and Personalized Learning Design—Uncovering Unconscious Incompetence. In: Burgos, D. (eds) Radical Solutions and Learning Analytics. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4526-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4526-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4525-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4526-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics