Abstract
Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) installed capacity has not been optimally optimized in Indonesia, although Geothermal is abundant. In fact, the institutional barrier and external factors are amongst factors determining GPP utilization and maintenance. To realize such potential, the Government of Indonesia (GoI) has conducted some initiatives to improve this condition. Particularly, it applies better and proper incentives such as fiscal incentives and conducts Preliminary Survey and Exploration Assignment (PSPE) to properly assesses the potential. The output of PSPE will provide more credible data to ease the risk and cost of the geothermal exploration phase. But there is also an inherent danger in the exploration phase, and the exploration cost tends to rise, makes the GPP less feasible. The trend of declining coal price is also a threat to GPP since it is more favorable to generate electricity from the cheap resource (coal-fired power plant). Thus, in order to lower the risk, technology adoption, and acquisition to reduce the cost and risk associated with exploration is essential. On the other hand, from the GoI’s view, Trilemma energy policy applied in Indonesia is the essential/basic consideration to regulate the energy business. For renewable energy, it is emphasized on the affordability aspect, thus in analyzing the institution’s policy, the set of the power purchase agreement and related rules remain as the decisive factors. The paper attempts to explain and assess the government initiatives on the issues mentioned above, by using SWOT and Policy Gap analysis to describe the Indonesian geothermal energy condition and analysis. Thus, this paper is constructed to provide an alternative solution to mitigate and ease such institutional barriers and external factors in Indonesia’s GPP.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sanyal SK, Morrow JW (2011) An investigation of drilling success in geothermal exploration, development, and operation. GRC Trans 35
Thorhallsson S, Sveinbjornsson BM (2012) Geothermal cost and drilling effectiveness. UNU-GTP. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269631557
Price Waterhouse Cooper (2018) Alternating currents: Indonesian power industry survey 2018, 2nd edn, July 2018
MoF (Ministry of Finance) (2010) Tax subsidy on. PMK No 21/PMK.011/2010
MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forestry) (2018) State of Indonesia’s forest. SK.25/MENLHK/SETJEN/PLA.2/2018
SMI (2015) SMI insight (state owned company for infrastructure financing)
Gehringer M, Loksha V (2012) Geothermal handbook: planning and financing power generation. ESMAP technical report no. 002/12. World Bank http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en396091468330258187/Geothermal-handbook-planning-and-financing-power-generation
Asian Development Bank and The World Bank (ADB and WB) (2015) Unlocking Indonesia’s geothermal potential
Geolec (2019) Factsheets on geothermal electricity. EGEC (European Geothermal Energy Council)
Asia Pacific Energy Research Center (APERC) (2015) Policy success factors for geothermal electricity development in the APEC region assessment of public policies on geothermal electricity in 6 APEC economies. Institute of Energy Economics Japan. http://aperc.ieej.or.jp
Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Arena) (2014) Looking forward: barrier, risk, and rewards of the Australian geothermal sector to 2020 and 2030
INL (2006) The future of geothermal energy
MIT (2007) The future of coal options for carbon-constrained world. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ISBN 978-0-615-14092-6
Munich Re (2015) Exploration risk assurance—Munich Re’s experience in Turkey, 22 Sept 2015
Riska E et al (2017) Potensi EGS (enhanced geothermal system) di Indonesia Perbandingan Aplikasi EGS di Lapangan Kamojang dan Dieng. Peran Penelitian Ilmu Kebumian Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia. In: Universitas Diponegoro Proceeding, Seminar Nasional Kebumian ke-19, 13–14 Sept 2017, Grha Sabha Pramana
Augustine C et al (2019) GeoVision analysis supporting task force report: electric sector potential to penetration. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. NREL/TP-6A20-71833. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/71833.pdf
Setiawan H (2014) Geothermal energy development in Indonesia: progress, challenges, and prospects. Ministry of Finance
World Energy Council (2018) World energy trilemma 2018
MEMR (2018) MEMR Regulation Number 37 Year 2018 about Preliminary Survey Assignment and Exploration
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tharom, T., Hadi, H.S. (2020). Identifying Geothermal Power Plant Institutional Barrier and External Factors in Indonesia. In: Sabino, U., Imaduddin, F., Prabowo, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Exhibition on Sustainable Energy and Advanced Materials. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4481-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4481-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4480-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4481-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)