Advertisement

Discussion: Cross-Cultural Adaptation Within the Bioecological Systems Theory

Chapter
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Having respectively detailed in Chaps.  4,  5 and  6 the findings from the Chinese doctoral students’ (CDS) experiences of planning, implementing, and reflecting phases, it is the time to place these findings into a theoretic framework for further analysis and synthesis in order to have a systematic and enlarged picture of the cross-cultural adaptation (CCA) process by CDS in Australia universities. The selected theoretic framework, as mentioned in the first three chapters, is the bioecological systems theory put forward by Bronfenbrenner. This chapter will tackle three crucial issues in relation to this theory. The first is applicability. In other words, is it applicable to use this framework to analyse the findings revealed so far? The justification will be made to answer why this framework is chosen. The second is feasibility. What could be the outcome if the findings are analysed in accordance with the principles established by the framework? The presentation of the analysis will demonstrate the validity of the framework. The third is flexibility. By actually analysing the data, any limitations which might hinder a sufficient exploration will be identified. In other words, the framework will be evaluated in terms of its effectiveness in analysing the CCA process by CDS.

References

  1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: Six theories of child development-revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In International encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Sciences. Reprinted in: (1993). Gauvain, M., & M. Cole, (Eds). Readings on the development of children (2nd ed) (pp. 37–43). New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1997). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 37–43). Basingstoke, England: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human being human: Biological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1993). Heredity, environment, and the question “How?”: A first approximation. In R. Plomin & G. E. McClearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture & psychology (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging theoretical models, research designs, and empirical findings. Social Development, 9, 115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114.
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of development processes. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1027). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) &R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Darling, N. (2007). Ecological systems theory: The person in the center of the circles. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 203–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600701663023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot, D. L., Baumfield, V., & Reid, K. (2016a). Searching for “a third space”: A creative pathway towards international Ph.D. students’ academic acculturation. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1180–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot, D. L., Baumfield, V., Reid, K., & Makara, K. A. (2016b). Hidden treasure: Successful international doctoral students who found and harnessed the hidden curriculum. Oxford Review of Education, 42(6), 733–748.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1229664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliot, D. L., Reid, K., & Baumfield, V. (2015). Beyond the amusement, puzzlement and challenges: An enquiry into international students’ academic acculturation. Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2198–2217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1029903.Google Scholar
  16. Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243–258.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shelton, L. (2019). The Bronfenbrenner primer: A guide to develecology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Tudge, J. R. H., Payir, A., Merçon-Vargas, E., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Li, J., et al. (2016). Still misused after all these years? A reevaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(4), 427–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Velez-Agosto, N. M., Soto-Crespo, J. G., Vizcarrondo-Oppenheimer, M., Vega-Molina, S., & Garcia Coll, C. (2017). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory revision: Moving culture from the macro into the micro. Perspect Psychol Sci, 12(5), 900–910.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617704397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). LS Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 548–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu, X. (2018). The role of self-reflection in facilitating cross-cultural adaptation as self-formation—A self-reflective diary approach. Reflective Practice, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1539661.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International RelationsSichuan International Studies UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.School of EducationThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  3. 3.School of EducationThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations