Advertisement

Surviving and Thriving: Navigating the Doctoral Trajectory

Chapter
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

As indicated in Chap.  3, this study develops its analysis around the planning, implementing, and reflecting phases of the Chinese doctoral students’ (CDS) study experience. Having shed light on the CDS’ motives, decision-making, and preparation in the planning phase in Chap.  4, this chapter is devoted to reporting findings from the implementing phase, focusing on how they navigate their cross-cultural adaptation (CCA) within the “ABC” model. Conflating critical incident technique (CIT) and visual graphics, this chapter delineates the CCA under three interlocked themes, viz. emotional wellbeing, behavioural coping, and researcher identification, respectively corresponding to affective, behavioural, and cognitive categories. The analysis supported that the CDS’ CCA was experienced as a cyclical and recurring process of stress-coping circumscribed by individual and situational variables that gave rise to a fluctuation of emotional wellbeing along their doctoral trajectory. Further, the CDS adopted varied coping strategies in order not only to be functional participants with adequate operational skills in the alien academic nexus, but also to be proactive agents optimising the host environment to hone their intercultural competence. Last, while the CDS affirmed doctoral study as an essentially independent enterprise, they kept cultivating membership in the research community via social identification with a researcher. An elaborated illumination of each part is detailed in the following sections.

References

  1. Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C. (2014). Writing groups, pedagogy, theory and practice: An introduction. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: innovations in practice and theory (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 265–278.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldwin, C. M., Sutton, K. J., Chiara, G., & Spiro, A. (1996). Age differences in stress, coping, and appraisal: Findings from the normative aging study. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51(4), 179–188.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, B., Cutright, M., & Anderson, S. (2013). Academic involvement in doctoral education: Predictive value of faculty mentorship and intellectual community on doctoral education outcomes. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, L. E. (1994). A new look at an old construct: Cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(3), 293–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90035-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auger, W. F., & Rich, S. J. (with Langford, H.). (2007). Curriculum theory and methods: Perspectives on learning and teaching. Mississauga, ON: John Wiley & Sons Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Boud, D. (2001). Introduction: Making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other (pp. 1–20). London, UK: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  8. Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cahusac de Caux, B. K. C. D., Lam, C. K. C., Lau, R., Hoang, C. H., & Pretorius, L. (2017). Reflection for learning in doctoral training: Writing groups, academic writing proficiency and reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 18(4), 463–473.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1307725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. (2015). Tools for teaching in an educationally mobile world. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Chatterjee-Padmanabhan, M., & Nielsen, W. (2016). Preparing to cross the research proposal threshold: A case study of two international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1251331.
  12. Cotterall, S. (2013). More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1999). The doctorate talking about the degree. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  14. Duangpracha, K. (2012). The accommodation challenges of international students. Doctoral thesis. Melbourne, VIC: RMIT University.Google Scholar
  15. Elliot, D. L., & Kobayashi, S. (2018). How can PhD supervisors play a role in bridging academic cultures? Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1517305.
  16. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  17. Flores, E. & Nerad, M. (2012). Peers in doctoral education: Unrecognized partners. New Directions for Higher Education, 157, Spring, 73–83.Google Scholar
  18. Fotovatian, S. (2012). Three constructs of institutional identity among international doctoral students in Australia. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(5), 577–588.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.658557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Grant, B. M. (2008). Agonistic struggle: Master slave dialogues in humanities supervision. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(1), 9–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022207084880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurevitch, Z. (2001). Dialectical dialogue: The struggle for speech, repressive silence, and the shift to multiplicity. British Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holliday, A., & Amadasi, S. (2020). Making sense of the intercultural: Finding decentred threads (1st ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14(2). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol14/iss2/3.
  26. Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, Y. Y. (2012). Beyond cultural categories: Communication, adaptation and transformation. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 229–243). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. NCRM Working Paper No. 03/09. Southampton, England: National Centre for Research Methods.Google Scholar
  29. Lahenius, K. (2012). Communities of practice supporting doctoral studies. International Journal of Management Education, 10, 29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lapum, J. L. (2008). The performative manifestation of a research identity: Storying the Journey through poetry. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), art. 39. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802392.
  31. Lee, J., Koeske, G. F., & Sales, E. (2004). Social support buffering of acculturative stress: A study of mental health symptoms among Korean international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 399–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course-taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marginson, S. (2014). Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(1), 6–22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315313513036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mason, S. (2018). Publications in the doctoral thesis: Challenges for doctoral candidates, supervisors, examiners and administrators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1231–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mazurek Melnyk, B., Slevin, C., Militello, L., Hoying, J., Teall, A., & McGovern, C. (2016). Physical health, lifestyle beliefs and behaviors, and mental health of entering graduate health professional students: Evidence to support screening and early intervention. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 28(4), 204–211.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merga, M. K. (2015). Thesis by publication in education: An autoethnographic perspective for educational researchers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 291–308.Google Scholar
  38. Mewburn, I., & Thomson, P. (2017). Towards an academic self? Blogging during the doctorate. In D. Lupton, I. Mewburn, & P. Thomson (Eds.), The digital academic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mok, K. H. (2016). Massifying and internationalising higher education, changing labour markets and social mobility: Challenges for education and urban governance. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(3), 233–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2016.1174402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Monaghan, C. H. (2011). Communities of practice: A learning strategy for professional development. Journal of Management Education, 35, 428–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muhammad, M., Wallerstein, N., Sussman, A. L., Avila, M., Belone, L., & Duran, B. (2015). Reflections on researcher identity and power: The impact of positionality on community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and outcomes. Critical Sociology (Eugene), 41(7–8), 1045–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513516025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Liaison Committee for International Students in Australia. (2008). Accommodation article, NLC. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from https://www.nlc.edu.au/main/news/accommodation_articles.html.
  43. Naylor, R., Chakravarti, S., & Baik, C. (2016). Differing motivations and requirements in PhD student cohorts: A case study. Issues in Educational Research, 26(2), 351–367.Google Scholar
  44. Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384–395.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nerad, M. (2012). Conceptual approaches to doctoral education: A community of practice. Alternation, 19(2), 57–72.Google Scholar
  46. Nettles, M. T. (1990). Success in doctoral programs: Experiences of minority and White students. American Journal of Education, 98(4), 494–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Orellana, M. L., Darder, A., Pérez, A., & Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Page, A., & Petray, T. (2016). Agency and structural constraints: Indigenous peoples and the Australian settler-state in North Queensland. Settler Colonial Studies, 6(1), 88–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2014.993057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pilbeam, C., & Denyer, D. (2009). Lone scholar or community member? The role of student networks in doctoral education in a UK management school. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 301–318.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pryor, J., & Croussard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pyhältö, K., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Doctoral students’ sense of relational agency in their scholarly communities. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhoads, R. A., Zheng, M., & Sun, X. (2016). The methodological socialisation of social science doctoral students in China and the USA. Higher Education, 73(2), 335–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0023-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robertson, M., Line, M., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2000). International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robinson, S. (2008). To be or not to be: Doctoral science students’ early experiences. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Preparing for Academic Practice: Disciplinary Perspectives, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  56. Rockinson-Szpakiw, A. J., Spaulding, L. S., & Knight, A. (2015). Protecting the marriage relationship during the doctoral journey. The Family Journal, 23(2), 141–146.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480714565106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2017). Exploring the relationship between doctoral students’ experiences and research community positioning. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(1), 16–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2016.1216832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sapranaviciute, L., Padaiga, Z., & Pauzienė, N. (2013). The stress coping strategies and depressive symptoms in international students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 827–831.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Silva, P., Woodman, K., Taji, A., Travelyan, J., Samani, S., Sharda, H., … Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. (2015). Support services for higher degree research students: A survey of three Australian universities. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(5), 469–481.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1095160.
  61. Son, J. B., & Park, S. S. (2014). Academic experiences of international PhD students in Australian higher education: From an EAP program to a PhD program. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(1), 26–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tesch, J., Baptista, A., Frick, L., Holley, K. A., Remmik, M., & Åkerlind, G. (2015). The doctorate as an original contribution to knowledge: Considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 55–67. https://dx.doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.147.
  63. Tian, M., & Lowe, J. (2013). The role of feedback in cross-cultural learning: A case study of Chinese taught postgraduate students in a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 580–598.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.670196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 46(3), 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tran, L. T., & Vu, T. T. P. (2018). “Agency in mobility”: Towards a conceptualisation of international student agency in transnational mobility. Educational Review, 70(2), 167–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1293615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turner, C. S. V., Wood, J. L., Montoya, Y. J., Essien-Wood, I. R., Neal, R., Escontrias, G., Jr., & Coe, A. (2012). Advancing the next generation of higher education scholars: An examination of one doctoral classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 103–112.Google Scholar
  68. Varga, M. A. (2015). A quantitative study of graduate student grief experiences. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 24(3), 170–186.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137315589700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). Psychology of culture shock (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  71. Wellington, J. (2010). Making supervision work for you. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ye, L. (2018). Intercultural experience and identity: Narratives of Chinese doctoral students in the UK. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International RelationsSichuan International Studies UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.School of EducationThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  3. 3.School of EducationThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations