Skip to main content

Globalization, Open-up, and the Journey of Major Powers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China’s Open-up Strategy (1978–2018)
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

Globalization gives birth to global powers and speeds up their rise and fall. The UK, the US and Japan are the products of such a trend. Their emergence and growth capture global attention; their practices are of great significance for development strategy experts around the world.

Whether if a nation could prosper and its people achieve rejuvenation depends on whether the nation and its people could keep up with the trend of the times and seize the initiative as history moves forward.

Xi Jinping on May 9, 2016 [1]

Behind a nation’s prosperity there is always a root cause.

Su [2]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On September 6, 1899, July 3, 1900, and October 22, 1900, the US circulated three “Open Door Notes” among the major powers of the time. The notes stressed that no power should interfere with any treaty port or any vested interest within any so-called “sphere of interest” or leased territory any other power may have in China; that equal and impartial trade with all parts of the Chinese Empire should be safeguarded; and that all powers should respect China’s territorial integrity and independence. The Open Door Policy, in essence, was the US’s way to protect its basic interests in East Asia by leveraging its strength and status. Maintaining a strategic balance in East Asia would prevent Britain, Japan, or Russia from becoming dominant in the region and provide a cover for the US’s intention of expanding its business interests and influence. The Policy was an early US move to achieve global economic hegemony and to create an independent Asia policy; it also represents an early attempt to create a new regional order in East Asia [11, 12].

  2. 2.

    For an in-depth analysis of the US’s global strategy and regional strategic deployments, see Ref. [11].

  3. 3.

    Stavrianos pointed out that even during the centuries of seclusion, the rulers of Japan made efforts to understand Europe's development. The reason Dutch traders were allowed to remain in Japan was that they could serve as a channel for information from the outside world. The bakufu and noble clans advocated learning from foreign militaries and supported schools that taught foreign languages or used foreign textbooks. The Japanese has always been discerning and more responsive in accepting Western culture. Given this background, it is not difficult to understand why when Western powers invaded, the Japanese responded in a way that was completely different from the Chinese [7].

  4. 4.

    The author divides the US’s rise to hegemony into four consecutive phases: the preparatory phase, consolidation phase, maintenance phase, and expansionary phase. The preparatory phase (founding of US to the end of WWII) saw the US gradually rise to power. In the consolidation phase (end of WWII to the early 1950s), the US spread its strategic deployments globally and in key regions as it sought to construct the core components of its structure of dominance. In the maintenance phase (late 1940s to the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s), the US’s hegemony underwent fluctuations and revealed its many facets, some typical of a competitive major power, others unique. In the current, expansionary phase (the end of the Cold War to the present), the US is changing its hegemonic strategic deployments—an ongoing process that intensified after the September 11th attacks [11].

  5. 5.

    A review of other countries’ experiences yields the lesson that as China opens up further to the outside world and economic globalization, it must also be adequately mindful of economic security risks arising from an open economy. China must maintain control over sensitive sectors and the supply and storage of key strategic resources (such as energy). It must also devise strategic and policy plans to avoid and diversify risks arising from external dependence and handle contingencies [61].

References

  1. Xi, Jinping. People’s Daily. 2016. Zai Shengbuji Zhuyao Lingdao Ganbu Xuexi Guanche Dang De Shibajie Wuzhong Quanhui Jingshen Zhuanti Yantaoban Shang De Jianghua (Speech at the Seminar for Provincial- and Ministerial-Level Officials on Learning and Implementing the Spirit of the 5th Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the CPC), May 10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shi, Su. Circa 1060. Su Shi Wenji•Ceduan Yi (Strategies, Part I–The Works of Su Shi). Orig. pub.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nye, Joseph S. 2000. Asia’s first globalizer. Washington Quarterly 23 (4): 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodrik, Dani. The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Central Compilation & Translation Bureau. 1995. Makesi Engesi Xuanji diyijuan (The Collected Works of Carl Marx and Frederick Engels, Volume I, 276). People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stavrianos, Leften Stavros. 2005. A Global History: From Prehistory to the 21st Century, 502–504. Beijing: Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kindleberge, Charles P. 2003. World Economic Primacy: 1500–1990, 216. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics 28 (3): 317–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, Angang (ed.). 2002. Quanqiuhua Tiaozhan Zhongguo (Globalization Challenges China, 17).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Men, Honghua. 2005. Baquan Zhiyi: Meiguo Guoji Zhidu Zhanlue (The Wings of Hegemony: America’s International Institutional Strategy). Beijing: Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibert, Felix. 1977. Bicentennial reflections. In Two Hundred Years of American Foreign Policy, 15. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strategies, Research Group for China Modernization. 2005. Zhongguo Xiandaihua Baogao 2005 (Jingji Xiandaihiua Yanjiu) [China Modernization Report 2005 (A Study on Economic Modernization)]: Research Group for China Modernization Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maddison, Angus. 1995. Monitoring the World Economy, 1820–1992, 162–165. Beijing: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maddison, Angus. 2003. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, 83–84 (Shijie Jingji Qiannian Shi). Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy, Paul. 2006. The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflicts from 1500 to 2000, 147–148. Beijing: Internaitonal Culture Pubishers.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hiscox, Michael J. 2005. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, And Mobility, 133. Beijing: Renmin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pigman, Geoffrey Allen. 1997. Hegemony and trade liberalization policy: Britain and the Brussels Sugar Convention of 1902. Review of International Studies 23 (2): 185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, Lemin. 2000. Ouzhou-Fen Yu He, Shuailuo Yu Zhongxin(Europe–Division and Unity, Decline and Rise, 364). Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zakaria, Fareed. 2001. From Wealth to Power, 65. Beijing: Xinhua Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ding, Zemin (ed.). 2002. Meiguo Tongshi Disanjuan Meiguo Neizhan Yu Dujin Shidai: 1861 Zhi 19 Shiji Mo (A Complete History of America, Volume 3: The Civil War and the Gilded Age, 1861 to the End of the 1800s, 77). Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2002. The eagle has crash landed. Foreign Policy 131: 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ikenberry, G.John. 2001. American power and the empire of capitalist democracy. Review of International Studies 27 (5): 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cox, Michael, Tim Dunne, and Ken Booth. 2001. Empires, systems and states: great transformations in international politics. Review of International Studies 27 (5): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pastor, Robert A. 2001. A Century’s Journey: How the Major powers Shape the World 1999, 29–34. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, Maoqing. 2003. Butong Leixin Guojia Duiwai Kaifang Zhengce De Bijiao (A comparison of different countries’ opening up policies). China Industrial Economics (10): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Atack, Jeremy, and Passell, Peter. 2000. A New Economic View of American History, 78. China Society Science Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Plesur, Milton. 1971. America’s outward thrust; approaches to foreign affairs, 1865–1890, 33. Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yu, Guifen. 2001. Xifeng Dongjian: Zhongri Shequ Xifang Wenhua De Bijiao Yanjiu (Influx of the West into the East: A Comparative Study of China and Japan in Embracing Western Culture, 148). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maddison, Angus. 1997. The World Economy: Historical Statistics, 13. Beijing: Reform Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Shengzu (ed.). 1995. Guoji Guanxishi Dierjuan (1814-1871) [A History of International Relations, Volume 2 (1814–1871), 246–247]. Beijing: World Culture Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Xinsheng. 2005. Riben Jianshi (A Brief History of Japan, 187). Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baldwin, Robert E. 2004. Openness and growth: what’s the empirical relationship? In Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, 499–526, 39. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rodriguez, Francisco, and Dani Rodrik. 2000. Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000 (15): 261–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Clemens, Michael A., and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 2001. A Tariff-Growth Paradox? Protection’s IMPACt the World Around 1875–1997. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  36. O’Rourke, Kevin H. 2000. Tariffs and growth in the late 19th century. The Economic Journal 110 (463): 456–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson, William R., and Lawrence Vescera. 1992. Growth waves, systemic openness, and protectionism. International Organization 46 (2): 493–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xi, Jinping. People’s Daily. 2013. Xi Jinping Zai Zhonggong Zhongyang Zhengzhiju Dijiuci Jiti Xuexi Shi Qiangdiao Minrui Bawo Shijie Keji Chuangxin Fazhan Qushi Qieshi Ba Chuangxin Qudong Fazhan Zhanlue Shishi Hao (Xi Jinping Emphasizes Seizing the Global Trend of Technological Innovation and Implementing the Innovation-Driven Strategy at the 9th Learning Session of the Central Politburo), October 2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Toffler, Alvin. 1991. Power shift. Knowledge, wealth and violence at the edge of the 21st century, 16. Central Party School Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pearson, Frederic S., and J. Martin Rochester. 1998. International Relations: The global condition in the Twenty-First Century, 4–7. McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.

    Google Scholar 

  41. He, Chuanqi. 2013. Zhongguo Fuxing De Kexue Jichu He Zhengce Fenxi (The scientific basis and policy analysis of China’s rejuvenation). World Sci-Tech R&D 35 (2): 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Drezner, Daniel. 2001. State structure, technological leadership and the maintenance of hegemony. Review of International Studies 27 (1): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Black, Cyril Edwin. 1996. Comparative Modernization: A Reader, 327, 332. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chen, Baosen. 1998. Meiguo “Xinjingji” Jiqi Shijie Yingxiang (America’s “New Economy” and its Global Influence). Pacific Journal (3): 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huang, Fengzhi. 2003. Zhishi Baquan Yu Meiguo De Shijie Xin Zhixu (The knowledge hegemony and America’s new world order). Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies (8): 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, Danhui. 2018. Duiwai Kaifang Sishinian: Zhongguo De Moshi Yu Jingyan (Forty years of opening up: China’s models and experience). China Economist (4): 68–95.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pei, Changhong, and Liu, Hongkui. 2018. Xi Jinping Xinshidai Duiwai Kaifang Sixiang De Jingjixue Fenxi (An economic analysis of Xi Jinping’s opening up concepts for a new era). Economic Research Journal (2): 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Guanzi. Guanzi Quanxiu. Orig. pub.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Youlun. 2002. Meiguo Tongshi Dierjuan: Meiguo De Duli He Chubu Fanrong (1775-1860) [A Complete History of America: Independence and Initial Prosperity (1775–1860), 390–397]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zi, Zhongjun. 2000. Ershi Shiji–Meiguo De Shiji?20 (The Twentieth Century—America’s Century?, 228–229). Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Resources, Zhongguo Jiaoyu Yu Renli Ziyuan Wenti Baogao Ketizu Research Group for China’s Education and Human. 2003. Cong Renkou Daguo Maixiang Renli Ziyuan Qiangguo (From a Populous Country to A Human Resource-Rich Country, 205). Beijing: Higher Education Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zi, Zhongjun. 1994. Zhanhou Meiguo Waijiaoshi–Cong Dulumen Dao Ligen (A History of Post-war America’s Diplomacy: From Truman to Reagan, 13). Beijing: World Culture Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Thompson, William R. 1988. On Global War: Historical-Structural Approaches to World Politics, 286. University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bairoch, Paul. 1982. International industrialization levels from 1750 to 1980. Journal of European Economic History 11 (2): 269.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bank, The World. 2010. Industry (Including Construction), Value Added (Constant 2010 US$). https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/NV.IND.TOTL.KD. Accessed.

  56. Wu, Jinglian. 2006. Zhongguo Zengzhang Moshi Jueze (A Choice of China’s Growth Models, 151). Shanghai: Shanghai Far East Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Huntington, Samuel P. 1999. The lonely superpower. Foreign Affairs: 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1998. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, 36–41 (Da Qiju: Meiguo De Shouyao Diwei Jiqi Diyuan Zhanlue). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Yang, Zhengwei. 2016. Zaiyin Kaifang Shengshi (Two cheers for Henday of open-up). Caijing Magazine (35): 81.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chen, Jinhua. 2010. Kaifang Yu Guojia Shuaisheng (Openness and the rise and fall of nations). Qiushi (8): 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jin, Bei. 2004. Zai Xinxingshi Xia Shixing Gengyouxiao De Duiwai Kaifang Zhanlue (Implementing a more effective opening up strategy under new circumstances). Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business (1): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Maddison, Angus. 2006. World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1-2003 AD. http://www.ggdc.net/maddison. Accessed.

  63. Society, Yano-Kota Memorial. 2007. Nihon Kokuseizue2007/08, 526. Yano-Kota Memorial Society.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Society, Yano-Kota Memorial. Janpan’s 20th Century, 119–124. Tokyo: Yano-Kota Memorial Society.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jiang, Xiaojuan. 2006. Lijie Kaifang Yu Zengzhang (Understanding opening up and growth) Comparative Studies 26: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honghua Men .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Men, H. (2020). Globalization, Open-up, and the Journey of Major Powers. In: China’s Open-up Strategy (1978–2018). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4047-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics