Abstract
This paper presents the study of a repairable complex system entailing of two subsystems in a series configuration with a controller. Under consideration of operations, the subsystem-1 works 2-out-of-4: G policy but the subsystem-2 has a single unit which is coupled with subsystem-1 in a series arrangement. The subsystem-1 has assumed to suffer by two types of failures, namely partial failure and complete failure. Further, the partial failure has been categorized into two kinds of partial failures (minor partial failure and major partial failure). The minor partial failures degrade the efficiency of the system, but due to major partial failure the system can work with seriously degraded mode, which may cause sudden damage by a further operation. The failure rates of both subsystems and controller are constant and follow the negative exponential distribution, but the repair follows two kinds of distribution. The supplementary variable technique has employed to assess the system for particular cases. The graph has demonstrated numerical results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dhillon BS, Anude OC (1994) Common cause failure analysis of a k-out-of-n: G system with the repairable unit. Microelectron Reliab 34(3):429–442
Goel LR, Gupta PP (1999) Analysis of a k-out-of-n unit system with two types of failure and preemptive maintenance. Microelectron Reliab 24(5):877–880
Jain SP, Gopal K (1985) Reliability of k-to-1-out-of-n systems. Reliab Eng 12(3):175–179
Chung WC (1993) Reliability analysis of a k-out-of-n: G redundant system in the presence of chance with multiple critical errors. Microelectron Reliab 33(3):331–334
Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Kumar D, Singh SB (2016) Stochastic analysis of the complex repairable system with deliberate failure are emphasizing reboot delay. Commun Stat-Simul Comput 45(2):583–602
Yusuf I (2015) Availability modeling, and evaluation of a repairable system subject to minor deterioration under imperfect repairs. Int J Math Oper Res 7(1):45–51
Yusuf I (2016) Reliability modelling of a parallel system with a supporting device and two types preventive maintenance. Int J Math Oper Res 25(3):269–286
Gulati J, Singh VV, Rawal DK, Goel CK (2016) Performance analysis of complex system in the series configuration under different failure and repair discipline using Gumbel–Hougaard family copula. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 23(2):1–21
Ram M, Singh SB, Singh VV (2013) Stochastic analysis of a standby complex system with waiting for repair strategy. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 43(3):698–707
Kadyan MS, Niwas R, Kumar J (2015) Probabilistic analysis of two reliability models of a single-unit system with preventive maintenance beyond warranty and degradation. Maint Reliab 17(4):535–543
Park M (2014) Warranty cost analysis for multicomponent systems with imperfect repair. Int J Reliab Appl 15(1):51–64
Ram M, Kumar A (2015) Performability analysis of a system under 1-out-of-2: G scheme with perfect reworking. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37(3):1029–1038
Singh VV, Ram M (2014) Multi-state k-out-of-n-type system analysis. Math Eng Sci Aerosp 5(3):281–292
Singh VV, Rawal DK (2011) Availability analysis of a system having two units in a series configuration with the controller and human failure under different repair policies. Int J Sci Eng Res 2(10):1–9
Yen TC, Chen WL, Chen JY (2016) Reliability and sensitivity analysis of the controllable repair system with warm standbys and working breakdown. Comput Ind Eng 97(3):84–97
El-Damcese MA, El-Sodany NH (2015) Reliability and sensitivity analysis of the k-out-of-n: G warm standby parallel repairable system with replacement at common cause failure using Markov model. Reliab Theory Appl 10(4):39–46
Singh VV, Singh SB, Ram M, Goel CK (2010) Availability analysis of system having three units super priority, priority and ordinary under primitive resume repair policy. Int J Reliab Appl 11(1):41–53
Singh VV, Ayagi HI (2017) Study of reliability measures of the system consisting of two subsystems in the series configuration using copula. Palestine J Math 6(2):102–111
Singh VV, Ayagi HI (2018) Stochastic analysis of a complex system under preemptive resume repair policy using Gumbel–Hougaard family copula. Int J Math Oper Res 12(2):273–291
Rawal DK, Ram M, Singh VV (2014) Modeling and availability analysis of internet data center with various maintenance policies. Int J Eng Trans A 27(4):599–608
Andrews JD, Moss TR (1993) Reliability, and risk assessment. Longman Scientific and Technical; Wiley, USA
Singh VV, Gulati J, Rawal DK (2018) Performance assessment of two unit’s redundant system under different failure and repair policies using copula. Int J Reliab Appl 19(2):114–129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, P., Ibrahim, K.H., Abubakar, M.I., Singh, V.V. (2020). Probabilistic Assessment of Complex System with Two Subsystems in Series Arrangement with Multi-types Failure and Two Types of Repair Using Copula. In: Kapur, P.K., Singh, O., Khatri, S.K., Verma, A.K. (eds) Strategic System Assurance and Business Analytics. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3647-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3647-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3646-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3647-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)