Skip to main content
  • 2147 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores through empirical research the similarities and differences that exist between multigenerational cohorts at work (i.e. Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y or Millennials) and their perspectives that relate to well-being at work. A qualitative methodological approach was adopted using 36 semi-structured interviews and two focus groups. The research questions explored the respondents’ definition of well-being at work, individual well-being at work need perspective, and how employers can enhance their happiness, health, and well-being at work of a multigenerational workforce. The findings reveal similarities and differences that exist between the multigenerational cohort definition, well-being needs, and improvements in well-being. This chapter discusses these commonalities and differences and implications for managers, HR practitioners, and organisational leaders. Future research in these areas is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AARP. (2004). Baby boomers, envision retirement II: Survey of baby boomers’ expectation for retirement, Washington DC, September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS). (2012). Health, work and wellbeing booklet. London: Author, March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alch, M. L. (2008). Get ready for a new type of worker in the workplace: The next generation. Supervision, 69(6), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E. (2002). The impact of new forms of work organization on workers. In G. Murray, J. Belanger, A. Giles, & P. A. Lapointe (Eds.), Work employment relations in the high-performance workplace (pp. 120–148). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste, N. R. (2007). Line management leadership: Implications for employee well-being. In: G. P. Clarkson (Ed.), Developing leadership research. Papers from the Northern Leadership Academy Fellow 2007 Conference (pp. 229–238). Leeds: Leeds University Business School, Leeds University Press Financial Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste, N. R. (2008). Line management leadership: Implications for employee well being at work. Developing Leadership Research: Papers from the Northern Leadership Academy Fellows 2007 Conference. UK: Leeds University Business School, Leeds University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste, N. R. (2009). Fun at well-being: Insights from senior managers in a local authority. Employee Relations, 31, 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. (2008). Working for a healthier tomorrow: Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of Britain’s working age population. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C. R. (2011). Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., Guthrie, J. P., & Paauwe, J. (2016). Editorial introduction: Progressing our understanding of the mediating variables linking HRM, employee well-being and organisational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 26, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the ‘strength’ of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, J., & Kelly, K. (2012). Maximizing Millennials in the workplace. UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School. www.execdev.unc.edu. Accessed September 20, 2019.

  • Braverman, M. (1999). Preventing workplace violence: A guide for employers and practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetto, Y., Farr-Wharton, R., & Shacklock, K. (2011). Communication, training and well-being, and commitment across nurse generations. Science Direct Nursing Outlook, 60(2012), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J., & Cooper, C. L. (2008). Building more effective organizations: HR management and performance in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). (2007). Absence management survey. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). (2019). Health and well-being at work. In Partnership with Simply Health, April 2019, championing better work and working lives. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2014). Work and wellbeing (Vol. III, Edited). West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., Farley, S., Axtell, C., Sprigg, C., Best, L., & Kwok, O. (2016). Understanding the relationship between experiencing workplace cyberbullying, employee mental strain and job satisfaction: A disempowerment approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 945–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, S. M., & Hodge, J. W. (2007). Generations in the workplace: Understanding age diversity. The Business Review, Cambridge, 9(1), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, A., Kelloway, K. E., & Hurrell, J. J. (2014). Workplace well-being: How to build psychologically health workplaces (Edited). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, F., Geare, A., Saunders, D., Beacker, M., & Faanunu, I. (2017). A transformative service research agenda: A study of workers’ well-being. The Service Industries Journal, 37, 84–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C., & Ralston, D. (2004). Generation cohorts and personal values: A comparison of China and the US. Organization Science, 15, 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, S. P. (2005, Autumn). Managing Generation Y. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(4), 4 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etiken, I., Abubaker, S., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferres, N., Travaglione, A., & Firns, I. (2003). Attitudinal differences between generation-x and older employees. International Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 6, 320–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. T., Cerasoli, C. P., Higgins, J. A., & Decesare, A. L. (2011). Relationships between psychological, physical, and behavioural health and work performance: A review and meta analysis. Work and Stress, 25, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. W., Greenwood, R.A., & Murphy, F. E. (2009). Generational differences in the workplace: Personal values, behaviours, and popular beliefs. Journal of Diversity Management, Third Quarter, 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A., Christianson, M., & Price, R. (2007). Happiness, health or relationships? managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. The Academy of Management, 21(3), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. (2002). Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: Building the worker in to HRM. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Executive. (2007). Managing stress at work—A competency framework for line managers. London: CIPD/HSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, G. (2005). Mixing and managing four generations of employees. FDU Magazine Online, Winter/Spring 2005. https://www.fdu.edu/newspubs/magazine/05ws/generations.htm. Accessed October 1, 2019.

  • Hansen, J.-I. C., & Leuty, M. E. (2012). Work values across generations. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(1):34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, B. (2011). The impact of generational differences on the workplace. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A. (2015). A business case for workers age 50+: A look at the value of experience. A report prepared for AARP. www.aarp.org/research.

  • Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investors in People. (2017). Improving performance with workplace well-being. Investors in People e-book. Published online February, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.investorsinpeople.com/resources/ideas-and-inspiration/improving-performanceworkplace-wellbeing. Accessed August 2, 2019.

  • Johnson, J. A., & Lopes, J. (2008). The Intergenerational workforce revisited. Organizational Development Journal, 26(1), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A., Jr. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, H., Fuller, C., & Sirias, D. (2002). Bridging the boomer Xer gap: Creating authentic teams for high performance at work. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehrli, S., & Sopp, T. (2006). Managing Generation Y. HR Magazine, 51(5), 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, D. (2002). Today’s generations face new communications gap. USA Today, November 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, H. P., & Loretto, W. (2017). Wellbeing and HRM in the changing workplace. The International Journal of Human Resources Management, 28(16), 2229–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are, why they clash, How to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyden, P., Teixeira, R., & Greenberg, E. (2007). The progressive politics of the millennial generation. New Politics Institute. https://www.ndn.org/paper/2007/progressive-politics-millennial-generation. Accessed August 21, 2019.

  • Loretto, W., Popham, F., Platt, S., Pavis, S., Hardy, G., MacLeod, G., & Gibbs, J. (2005). Assessing psychological well-being: A holistic investigation of NHS employees. International Review of Psychiatry, 17, 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, E. (2000). Qualitative data display: Data display model. In C. Fife-Schaw (Ed.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 269–280). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, S., Duxburg, L., & Huggins, C. (2005). Are gender differences in basic human values a generational phenomenon? Sex Roles Journal, 53(9/10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, O., & Wapshott, R. (2017). Small business revivalism: Employment relations in small and medium sized enterprises. Work, Employment and Society, E-special issue, 1–8. Published online—March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1953). Essays on sociology and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, M. (2005). What you are is where you were when—Again!. Cambridge, MA: Enterprise Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, S. A. (2005). Incorporating generational diversity. AORN Journal, The Official Voice of Perioperative Nursing, 81(6), 1149–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D. (2008). Boomers pass the workplace torch. The Lane Report, 23(5), 34 plus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (2004). The future of work: Organizational and international perspectives. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. F., Jr., Greenwood, R., Ruiz-Gutierrez, J., Manyak, T. G., Mujtaba, B., & Uy, A. (2006, August). Generational value changes: Their history and a cross-cultural empirical test. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. A. (2010). Leading a multi-generational workforce. AARP. file:///F:/A_ACADEMIC%20BOOK/AA_MAIN%20ACADEMIC%20JOURNALS/GENERA TIONAL%20WORKFORCE%20AND%20WELLBEING/Leading%20a%20Generation%20 workforce.pdf. Accessed October 2 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. (2013). Review article: How can we make organizational interventions work? Employees and line managers as actively crafting interventions. Human Relations, 66, 1029–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the ‘why’ of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). How’s life? 2015: Measuring well-being. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patota, N., Schwartz, D., & Schwartz, T. (2007). Leveraging generational differences for productivity gains. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 11(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R. (2004). Human resource management and the search for the happy workplace. Inaugural address. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R. E., Van de Voorde, K. C., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2013). HRM, wellbeing and performance: A theoretical and empirical review. In J. Paauwe, D. E. Guest, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), Human resource management and performance (pp. 15–46). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I., & Cooper, C. (2011). Well-being: Productivity and happiness at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rottier, A. (2001). Generation 2001: Loyalty and values—Generation X and work. Workforce. https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_mOFXS/is_10_80/ai_7935245?tag=rbxcra.2.a.3. Accessed September 20, 2019.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, O. (2017). Grit: The will to overcome. A characteristic that winners share and how to instil and nurture it in your team. Virgin Pulse Data Scientist 2017. www.virginpulse.com.

  • Sago, B. (2000). Uncommon threads: Mending the generation gap at work. Executive Update, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schullery, N. M. (2013). Workplace engagement and generational differences in values. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk. Text and Interaction. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnet, S., Kralj, A., & Kandampully, J. (2012). Generation Y employees: An examination of work attitude differences. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 17(3), 36–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, S. (2003). How employee engagement drives growth. Gallup Workplace, Accessed June 20, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, P. G. (2014). Grit: The new science of what it takes to persevere, flourish, and succeed. Climb Strong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1997). The fourth turning: What the cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, B. (2007). Welcome to the new workplace. ABC Banking Journal, 99(2), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, D., Cohen, J., & de la Cuesta, K. (2005). The Multigenerational nursing workforce: Essential differences in perception of work environment. Nursing Journal of Administration, 35, 283–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trunk, P. (2007). What Generation Y really wants. https://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0.917131640395.00.html. Accessed October 1, 2019.

  • United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed October 1, 2019.

  • Van de Voorde, K. C., Paauwe, J., & van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well-being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 735–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1994). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Michigan: Althouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. D., & Wood, S. J. (2005). The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science. Human Relations, 58, 429–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (2001). After X comes Y—Echo boom generation enters the workforce. HR Magazine from https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3495/is_46_ai_73848314. Accessed August 1, 2019.

  • Walston, S. F. (1999). Distinguishing communication approaches across generations (online publication). https://www.walstoncourage.com/pages/articles/generation.htm. Accessed July, 2019.

  • Weston, M. (2001). Coaching generations in the workplace. Nursing Administration Quarterly/Winter 2001, 25(2), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, B. (2011). Potential workplace violence prevention and your organizational success. New York: Highpoint Executive Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, C., & Guest, D. E. (2014). When good HR gets bad results: Exploring the challenge of HR implementation in the case of workplace bullying. Human Resource Management Journal, 24, 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Cvenkel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cvenkel, N. (2020). Multigenerational Workforce and Well-Being in the Twenty-First-Century Workplace. In: Well-Being in the Workplace: Governance and Sustainability Insights to Promote Workplace Health . Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3619-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics