FDI, Labor Market and Welfare: How Inequality Navigates Welfare Loss?
- 252 Downloads
A significant growth of foreign direct investment (FDI) over the years led to substantial changes in the labor markets of host and home countries. From a host country perspective, the FDI happens to have greater impact on the labor markets conditions where it perpetuates the skewed labor market outcomes and steady income growth. Toward this end, this study explores the welfare implications of FDI on labor market for a panel of 64 countries during the period 1991–92 to 2014–15. We estimate the effect of FDI on labor market outcomes and welfare loss in labor markets by augmenting the welfarist approach of Atkinson (1970) and estimate the loss function. The results reveal that FDI impacts labor markets positively for both developed and developing countries. However, the long-run effects of FDI show a significant difference among the sectoral labor market measures leading to unequal outcomes. On estimating the loss function, we observe a substantial loss of welfare in income and labor market outcomes with a higher magnitude in middle and high-income countries.
KeywordsFDI Labor market Panel data Welfare
JEL classificationF21 I31 J21
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Forum for Global Knowledge Sharing. We thank Alakh Sharma and the conference participants for the useful comments and suggestions.
- Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In: O. Ashenfelter & D. E. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar
- Antràs, P., de Gortari, A., & Itskhoki, O. (2017). Globalization, inequality and welfare. Journal of International Economics, 108(C), 387–412.Google Scholar
- Bhagwati, J. A., & Blinder, A.S. (2009). Offshoring of American jobs. What response from U.S. economic policy? Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Blomström, M., & Kokko, A., (2003). The economics of foreign direct investment incentives. NBER Working Paper 9489.Google Scholar
- Campos, N. F., & Kinoshita, Y. (2002b). Foreign direct investment as technology transferred: Some panel evidence from the transition economies. William Davidson Institute, Working Paper No. 438.Google Scholar
- Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Girma, S., Thompson, S., & Wright, P. W. (2002). Why are productivity and wages higher in foreign firms? The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, 33(1), 93–100.Google Scholar
- Hale, G., & Xu, M. (2016). FDI effects on the labor market of host countries. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper No. 2016-25.Google Scholar
- Holland, D. N., Sass, M., Benacek, V., & Gronicki, M. (2000). The determinants and impact of foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparison of survey and econometric evidence. Transnational Corporations, 9(3), 163–212.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, R. (2006). Globalization, FDI and employment in Vietnam. Transnational Corporations, 15(1), 115–142.Google Scholar
- Jones, R., & Kierzkowski, H. (2001). A framework for fragmentation. In S. Arndt & H. Kierzkowski (Eds.), Fragmentation: New production patterns in the world economy (pp. 17–34). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Klein, M., Aaron, C., & Hadjimichael, B. (2001). Foreign direct investment and poverty reduction. Policy Research Working Paper 2613, World Bank.Google Scholar
- Onaran, O. (2008). Jobless growth in the Central and East European countries: A country-specific panel data analysis of the manufacturing industry. Eastern European Economics, 46(4), 90–115.Google Scholar
- Ravallion M (1999). Issues in measuring and modeling poverty. World Bank Research Policy Papers. No. XXX, November 1999.Google Scholar
- Lucas, R., Jr. (1990). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? The American Economic Review, 80(2), 92–96.Google Scholar