Advertisement

Role of Bacterial Communities to Prevent the Microbial Growth on Cultural Heritage

  • Hina Upadhyay
  • Vandna Chhabra
  • Jatinder SinghEmail author
Chapter
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Different microorganisms have a considerable and important role in maintenance and prevention of cultural heritage buildings or different materials from deterioration. They have key role in deterioration processes. So, there is an urgent need to upgrade and apply new technologies and methods to identify the responsible microorganisms and manage them by using eco-friendly methods. However, there is a common consent that microorganisms play a significant role in the deterioration of cultural heritage, along with the same few microbes also play a significant role as a biocleaning agents, for the conservation of such type of materials. Recent research is carried out in this field where few microbial especially bacterial strains have been utilized as bio cleaning agents, which are frequently used in the preservation and restoration of cultural heritage. In this book chapter, we are highlighting the concerned common deteriorating agents and its control by using different strategies, with reference to the role of various kinds of bacterial communities for the management of such kind of problems in historical-cultural materials.

Keywords

Biodeterioration Cultural heritage Sulphate-utilizing microbes Biocleaning technique 

References

  1. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Goyal S, Reddy M (2012) Corrosion prevention of reinforced concrete with microbial calcite precipitation. ACI Mater J 109:157–164Google Scholar
  2. Anderson S, Appanna VD, Huang J, Viswanatha T (1992) A novel role for calcite in calcium homeostasis. FEBS Lett 308:94–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basaran Z (2013) Biomineralization in cement based materials: inoculation of vegetative cells. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  4. Cacchio P, Ercole C, Cappuccio G, Lepidi A (2003) Calcium carbonate precipitation by bacterial strains isolated from a limestone cave and from a loamy soil. Geomicrobiol J 20:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castanier S, Le Métayer-Levrel G, Perthuisot J-P (1999) Ca-carbonates precipitation and limestone genesis—the microbiogeologist point of view. Sedimentary Geol 126:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Belie N, Wang J (2016) Bacteria based repair and self-healing of concrete. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater 5:35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Muynck W, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2010) Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. Ecol Eng 36:118–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gauri KL, Parks L, Jaynes J, Atlas R (1992) Removal of sulphated-crust from marble using sulphate-reducing bacteria. In: Proceedings of the international conference held in Edinburgh, UK, pp 160–165Google Scholar
  9. Ghosh PS, Mandal BD, Chattopadhyay S, Pal (2005) Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 35:1980–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghosh P, Mandal S, Pal S, Bandyopadhyaya G, Chattopadhyay BD (2006) Development of bioconcrete material using an enrichment culture of novel thermophilic anaerobic bacteria. J Exp Biol 44:336Google Scholar
  11. González-Ruibal A (2005) The need for a decaying past: an archaeology of oblivion in contemporary Galicia (NW Spain). Home Cult 2:129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hideo Arai (2013) Microbiological problems in biodeterioration of cultural property: forty years of study. In: Dhawan S, Abduraheem K, Virendra N (eds) Biodeterioration of cultural Property-7. ICBCP, Sukriti Nikunj, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  13. Horie CV (1987) Materials for conservation: organic consolidants, adhesives and coatings. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Jroundi F, Fernández-Vivas A, Rodriguez-Navarro C, Bedmar EJ, González-Muñoz MT (2010) Bioconservation of deteriorated monumental calcarenite stone and identification of bacteria with carbonatogenic activity. Microb Ecol 60:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koestler RJ (2000) When bad things happen to good art. Int Biodet Biodeg 46:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar R, Kumar AV (1999) Biodeterioration of stone in tropical environments: an overview. Getty Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  17. Law JH, Slepecky RA (1961) Assay of poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid. J Bacteriol Res 82:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Metayer-Levrel G, Castanier S, Orial G, Loubiere JF, Perthuisot JP (1999) Applications of bacterial carbonatogenesis to the protection and regeneration of limestones in buildings and historic patrimony. Sediment Geol 126:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewin SZ, Baer NS (1974) Rationale of the barium hydroxide-urea treatment of decayed stone. Stud Conserv 19:24–35Google Scholar
  20. McNamara CJ, Perry TD, Bearce KA, Hernandez-Duque G, Mitchell R (2006) Epilithic and endolithic bacterial communities in limestone from a Maya archaeological site. Microb Ecol 51:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orial G, Castanier S, Le Metayer G, Loubière JF (1992) The biomineralization: a new process to protect calcareous stone; applied to historic monuments. In: Biodeterioration of cultural property 2: proceedings of the 2nd international conference on biodeterioration of cultural property, Valladolid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  22. Park S-J, Park Y-M, Chun W-Y, Kim W-J, Ghim S-Y (2010) Calcite-forming bacteria for compressive strength improvement in mortar. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:782–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Price C, Ross K, White G (1988) A further appraisal of the ‘lime technique’ for limestone consolidation, using a radioactive tracer. Stud Conserv 33:178–186Google Scholar
  24. Ranalli G, Matteini M, Tosini I, Zanardini E, Sorlini C (2000) Bioremediation of cultural heritage: removal of sulphates, nitrates and organic substances. In: Of microbes and art. Springer, Boston, pp 231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ranalli G et al (2005) Biotechnology applied to cultural heritage: biorestoration of frescoes using viable bacterial cells and enzymes. J Appl Microbiol 98:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rivadeneyra MA, Párraga J, Delgado R, Ramos-Cormenzana A, Delgado G (2004) Biomineralization of carbonates by Halobacillus trueperi in solid and liquid media with different salinities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rivadeneyra MA, Martín-Algarra A, Sánchez-Navas A, Martín-Ramos D (2006) Carbonate and phosphate precipitation by Chromohalobacter marismortui. Geomicrobiol J 23:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Rodriguez-Gallego M, Chekroun KB, Gonzalez-Munoz MT (2003) Conservation of ornamental stone by Myxococcus xanthus-induced carbonate biomineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2182–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sáiz-Jiménez C (1997) Biodeterioration vs biodegradation: the role of microorganisms in the removal of pollutants deposited on historic buildings. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 40:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sand W (2001) Microbial corrosion and its inhibition. In: Rehm HJ (ed) Biotechnology, vol 10. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, pp 183–190Google Scholar
  31. Sarda D, Choonia HS, Sarode DD, Lele SS (2009) Biocalcification by Bacillus pasteurii urease: a novel application. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1111–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Setlow P (1994) Mechanisms which contribute to the long–term survival of spores of Bacillus species. J Appl Microbiol 76:49–60Google Scholar
  33. Tiano P, Biagiotti L, Mastromei G (1999) Bacterial bio-mediated calcite precipitation for monumental stones conservation: methods of evaluation. J Microbiol Methods 36:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiano P, Cantisani E, Sutherland I, Paget J (2006) Biomediated reinforcement of weathered calcareous stones. J Cult Herit 7:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tilak ST, Pande BN (1997) Biodeteriogens inside a library. In: Agashe SN (ed) Aerobiology. Pub. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi, pp 177–189Google Scholar
  36. Verma RK, Chaurasia L, Bisht V, Thakur M (2015) Bio-mineralization and bacterial carbonate precipitation in mortar and concrete. J Biosci Bioeng India 1:5–11Google Scholar
  37. Wang J (2013) Self-healing concrete by means of immobilized carbonate precipitating bacteria. PhD thesis, Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang J, Soens H, Verstraete W, De Belie N (2014) Self-healing concrete by use of microencapsulated bacterial spores. Cem Concr Res 56:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Warscheid T, Braams J (2000) Biodeterioration of stone: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 46:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Webster A, May E (2006) Bioremediation of weathered-building stone surfaces. Trends Biotechnol 24:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgronomySchool of Agriculture, Lovely Professional UniversityJalandharIndia
  2. 2.Department of HorticultureSchool of Agriculture, Lovely Professional UniversityJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations