Advertisement

Biocement: A Novel Approach in the Restoration of Construction Materials

  • Hesham El EnshasyEmail author
  • Daniel Joe Dailin
  • Roslinda Abd Malek
  • Nurul Zahidah Nordin
  • Ho Chin Keat
  • Jennifer Eyahmalay
  • Santosh Ramchuran
  • Jimmy Ngow Chee Ghong
  • Veshara Malapermal Ramdas
  • Rajesh Lalloo
Chapter
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Concrete is the most commonly used construction material worldwide for the development of durable structures. Structural integrity and design of buildings have become increasingly important in construction engineering as well as assessment of mixed formulation including cement and aggregate (i.e. sand, slag and stone). Microcrack formation on concrete may result in increased degradation and porous concrete. Therefore, there is a need to preserve and maintain concrete structures due to its high associated cost of restoration. In addition, reducing the negative environmental impact due to high CO2 emissions during cement production need to be considered as well. One key solution includes bio-based self-healing techniques. Research has focused on biomineralisation, a method of sealing microcracks using bacterial calcium carbonate deposits, via a common process of biocementation or microbiologically induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP). As such, these deposits possess promising micro-bonding and pore-filling macro-effects for potential application in the construction industry. In view of these novel state-of-the-art techniques, this chapter provides an overview of potential microbes, mode of action of the self-healing process, primary limitations for future techniques and potential applications in the construction industry.

Keywords

Biomineralisation Self-healing Biocement Calcium carbonate Urease Building materials 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks for the support of the Ministry of Education (MoE) and UTM-RMC (Malaysia) through HICoE Grant No. RJ130000.7846.4 J262.

References

  1. Abo-El-Enein SA, Ali AH, Talkhan FN, Abdel-Gawwad HA (2013) Application of microbial biocementation to improve the physico-mechanical properties of cement mortar. HBRC J 9:36–40Google Scholar
  2. Achal V, Mukherjee A (2015) A review of microbial precipitation for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater 93:1224–1235Google Scholar
  3. Achal V, Pan X (2014) Influence of calcium sources on microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation by Bacillus sp. CR2. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:307–317Google Scholar
  4. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Basu PC, Reddy MS (2009) Strain improvement of Sporosarcina pasteurii for enhanced urease and calcite production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:981–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Reddy MS (2010) Biocalcification by Sporosarcina pasteurii using corn steep liquor as the nutrient source. Ind Biotechnol 6:170–174Google Scholar
  6. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Kumari D, Zhang Q (2015) Biomineralization for sustainable construction – a review of processes and applications. Earth-Sci Rev 148:1–17Google Scholar
  7. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Zhang Q (2016) Unearthing ecological wisdom from natural habitats and its ramifications on development of biocement and sustainable cities. Landsc Urban Plan 155:61–68Google Scholar
  8. Anbu P, Kang CH, Shin YJ, So JS (2016) Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications. Springerplus 5:250–262PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Anitha V, Abinaya K, Prakash S, Seshagiri Rao A, Vanavil B (2018) Bacillus cereus KLUVAA mediated biocement production using hard water and urea. Chem Biochem Eng Q 32:257–266Google Scholar
  10. Ariyanti D, Handayani NA, Hadiyanto (2012) Feasibility of using microalgae for biocement production through biocementation. J Bioprocess Biotech 2:2Google Scholar
  11. Belie ND, Muynck WD (2009) Crack repair in concrete using biodeposition. In: Proceedings of the international conference on concrete repair, rehabilitation and retrofitting, pp 291–292Google Scholar
  12. Ben Omar N, Arias JM, Gonzalez-Munoz MT (1997) Extracellular bacterial mineralization within the context of geomicrobiology. Microbiologia 13:161–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bucci NA, Ghazanfari E, Lu H (2016) Microbially-induced calcite precipitation for sealing rock fractures. In Geo-Chicago, Chicago, pp 558–567Google Scholar
  14. Cardoso R, Pires I, Duarte SO, Monteiro GA (2018) Effects of clay’s chemical interactions on biocementation. Appl Clay Sci 156:96–103Google Scholar
  15. Chu J (2016) Solutions to sustainability in construction: some examples. Procedia Eng 145:1127–1134Google Scholar
  16. Chu J, Ivanov V, He J, Maeimi M, Wu S (2015) Use of biogeotechnologies for soil improvement. In: Ground improvement case histories. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 571–589Google Scholar
  17. Constable M, Charlton M, Jensen F, Mcdonald K, Craig G, Taylor KW (2003) An ecological risk assessment of ammonia in the aquatic environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:527–548Google Scholar
  18. De Jong JT, Soga K, Kavazanjian E, Burns S, Van Paassen, Bang SS et al (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 63:287–301Google Scholar
  19. De Muynck W, Cox K, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2008) Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Constr Build Mater 22:875–885Google Scholar
  20. De Muynck DW, Belie DN, Verstraete W (2010) Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. J Ecol Eng 36:118–136Google Scholar
  21. Dhami NK, Reddy MS, Mukherjee A (2012) Improvement in strength properties of ash bricks by bacterial calcite. Ecol Eng 39:31–35Google Scholar
  22. Dick J, De Windt W, De Graef B, Saveyn H, Van der Meeren P, De Belie N et al (2006) Bio-deposition of a calcium carbonate layer on degraded limestone by Bacillus species. Biodegradation 17:357–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Flatt RJ, Roussel N, Cheeseman CR (2012) Concrete: an eco material that needs to be improved. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:2787–2798Google Scholar
  24. Ghosh P, Mandal S, Chattopadhyay BD, Pal S (2005) Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 35:1980–1983Google Scholar
  25. Ghosh P, Mandal S, Pal S, Bandyopadhyaya G, Chattopadhyay BD (2006) Development of bioconcrete material using an enrichment culture of novel thermophilic anaerobic bacteria. Indian J Exp Biol 44:336–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay BD, Mandal S (2008) Use of hot spring bacteria for remediation of cracks and increment of durability of structures. Indian Concr J 1:11–16Google Scholar
  27. Ghosh S, Biswas M, Chattopadhyay BD, Mandal S (2009) Microbial activity on the microstructure of bacteria modified mortar. J Cem Concr Compos 31:93–98Google Scholar
  28. Hammes F, Verstraete W (2002) Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial carbonate precipitation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:3–7Google Scholar
  29. Hosseini MM, Shao Y, Whalen JK (2011) Biocement production from silicon-rich plant residues: perspectives and future potential in Canada. Biosyst Eng 110:351–362Google Scholar
  30. Huang H, Ye G, Qian C, Schlangen E (2016) Self-healing in cementitious materials: materials, methods and service conditions. Mater Des 92:499–511Google Scholar
  31. Iezzi B, Brady R, Sardag S, Eu B, Skerlos S (2019) Growing bricks: assessing biocement for lower embodied carbon structures. Procedia CIRP 80:470–475Google Scholar
  32. Irwan JM, Teddy T (2017) An overview of bacterial concrete on concrete durability in aggressive environment. Pertanika J Sci Technol 25:259–264Google Scholar
  33. Irwan JM, Anneza LH, Othman N, Alshalif AF, Zamer MM, Teddy T (2017) Mechanical properties of concrete with Enterococcus faecalis and calcium lactate. Procedia Eng 171:592–597Google Scholar
  34. Ivanov V, Stabnikov V (2016) Construction biotechnology: biogeochemistry, microbiology and biotechnology of construction materials and processes. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  35. Jagannathan P (2018) Studies on the mechanical properties of bacterial concrete with two bacterial species. Mater Today Proc 5:8875–8879Google Scholar
  36. Jala S, Goyal D (2006) Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production-a review. Bioresour Technol 97:1136–1147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jian C, Ivanov V (2009) Biocement – a new sustainable and energy saving material for construction and waste treatment. Civil Eng Res 7:53–54Google Scholar
  38. Jonkers HM (2007) Self-healing concrete: a biological approach. In: Self healing materials. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–204Google Scholar
  39. Jonkers HM (2011) Bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Heron 56(1/2):1–12Google Scholar
  40. Jonkers HM (2018) Bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36:230–235Google Scholar
  42. Jroundi F, Schiro M, Ruiz-Agudo E, Elert K, Martín-Sánchez I, González-Muñoz MT, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2017) Protection and consolidation of stone heritage by self-inoculation with indigenous carbonatogenic bacterial communities. Nat Commun 8:279PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Khanafari A, Khams FN, Sepahy AA (2011) An investigation of biocement production from hard water. Middle-East J Sci Res 7:964–971Google Scholar
  44. Knoben W (2011) Bacteria care for concrete. Mater Today 14:444Google Scholar
  45. Kuznetsov A, Larionov D, Stepu A, Kuznetsov V, Putlayev V, Ivanov V (2009) Calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated via chemical bonding technique from different precursors. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik: Entwicklung, Fertigung, Prüfung, Eigenschaften und Anwendungen technischer Werkstoffe 40:277–284Google Scholar
  46. Lasheras-Zubiate M, Navarro-Blasco I, Fernández JM, Alvarez JI (2012) Effect of the addition of chitosan ethers on the fresh state properties of cement mortars. Cem Concr Compos 34:964–973Google Scholar
  47. Lee H, Ha HS, Lee CH, Lee YB, Kim PJ (2006) Fly ash effect on improving soil properties and rice productivity in Korean paddy soils. Bioresour Technol 97:1490–1497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Li Q, Csetenyi L, Paton G, Gadd GM (2015a) CaCO3 and SrCO3 bioprecipitation by fungi isolated from calcareous soil. Environ Microbiol 17:3082–3089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Li MM, Kawasaki S, Zhang QZ, Achal V (2015b) Novel microbial based low energy green building material production technology. J Adv Mater Res 1090:96–100Google Scholar
  50. Li M, Fang C, Kawasaki S, Achal V (2018) Fly ash incorporated with biocement to improve strength of expansive soil. Sci Rep 8:25–65Google Scholar
  51. López-Cuevas J, Vargas-Gutiérrez G, Rodríguez-Galicia JL, Rendón-Angeles JC (2018) Effect of some organic binders on the mechanical strength of hydroxyapatite-based biocements. MRS Adv 3:3729–3734Google Scholar
  52. Lu D, Zhou S (2007) High strength biological cement composition and using the same. US Patent, US 2007/0098811 A1Google Scholar
  53. Luhar S, Gourav S (2015) A review paper on self healing concrete. J Civil Eng Res 5:53–58Google Scholar
  54. Luo M, Qian CX, Li RY (2015) Factors affecting crack repairing capacity of bacteria based self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 87:1–7Google Scholar
  55. Morsali S, Isildar GY, Tahni A (2019) The application of bacteria as a main factor in self-healing concrete technology. J Build Pathol Rehabil 4:7Google Scholar
  56. Muhammad NZ, Shafaghat A, Keyvanfar A, Majid MZA, Ghoshal SK, Yasouj SEM, Shirdar MR (2016) Tests and methods of evaluating the self-healing efficiency of concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 112:1123–1132Google Scholar
  57. Mukherjee A, Achal V (2014) A biological route for producing low energy binders. In: 23rd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM23), pp 9–12Google Scholar
  58. Naeimi M, Haddad A (2018) Investigation on the environmental impact of soil improvement techniques: comparison of cement grouting and biocement. In: GeoShanghai international conference. Springer, pp 483–490Google Scholar
  59. Neville AM (1996) Properties of concrete. Pearson higher education, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  60. Noshi CI, Schubert JJ (2018) Self-healing biocement and its potential applications in cementing and sand-consolidation jobs: a review targeted at the oil and gas industry. In SPE liquids-rich basins Conference-North America. The Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  61. Omoregie AI, Khoshdelnezamiha G, Senian N, Ong DEL, Nissom PM (2017) Experimental optimisation of various cultural conditions on urease activity for isolated Sporosarcina pasteurii strains and evaluation of their biocement potentials. Ecol Eng 109:65–75Google Scholar
  62. Pacheco-Torgal F, Labrincha JA (2013) Biotech cementitious materials: some aspects of an innovative approach for concrete with enhanced durability. Constr Build Mater 40:1136–1141Google Scholar
  63. Parmar S, Marjadi D (2017) Bio cementation: a novel technique and approach towards sustainable material. World J Res Rev 4:36–41Google Scholar
  64. Phung QT, Maes N, Schutter GD, Jacques D, Ye G (2013) Determination of water permeability of cementitious materials using a controlled constant flow method. Constr Build Mater 47:1488–1496Google Scholar
  65. Qian CX, Wang JY, Wang RX, Cheng L (2009) Corrosion protection of cement-based building materials by surface deposition of CaCO3 by Bacillus pasteurii. Mater Sci Eng C 29:1273–1280Google Scholar
  66. Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using microorganisms. ACI Mater J 98:3–9Google Scholar
  67. Reddy MS, Joshi S (2018) Carbon dioxide sequestration on biocement-based composites. In: Carbon dioxide sequestration in cementitious construction materials. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 225–243Google Scholar
  68. Reddy S, Manjusha A, Arun Kumar M (2015) Bio cement–an eco-friendly construction material. Int J Curr Eng Technol 5:2277–4106Google Scholar
  69. Rong H, Qian CX (2012) Characterization of microbe cementitious materials. Chin Sci Bull 57:1333–1338Google Scholar
  70. Roselló J, Soriano L, Santamarina MP, Akasaki JL, Melges JLP, Payá J (2015) Microscopy characterization of silica-rich agrowastes to be used in cement binders: bamboo and sugarcane leaves. Microsc Microanal 21:1314–1326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Schlangen HEJG, Jonkers HM, Qian S, Garcia A (2010) Recent advances on self healing of concrete. In: FraMCos-7: proceedings of the 7th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures, Jeju Island, Korea, 23–28 May 2010Google Scholar
  72. Sikder A, Saha P (2019) Effect of bacteria on performance of concrete/mortar: a review. Int J Recent Technol Eng 7(6C2):12–17Google Scholar
  73. Skinner HCW, Jahren AH (2004) Biomineralization. In: Biogeochemistry (Treatise on geochemistry, vol 8) (Schlesinger WH (ed)) 8:117–184Google Scholar
  74. Song JS, Mante FK, Romanow WJ, Kim S (2006) Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray ProRoot MTA, white ProRoot MTA, and gray MTA-Agelus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102:809–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Stabnikov V (2016) Production of bioagent for calcium-based biocement. Int J Biotechnol Wellness Ind 5:60–69Google Scholar
  76. Stabnikov V, Ivanov V (2016) Biotechnological production of biopolymers and admixtures for eco-efficient construction materials. In: Biopolymers and biotech admixtures for eco-efficient construction materials. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 37–56Google Scholar
  77. Stabnikov V, Naeimi M, Ivanov V, Chu J (2011) Formation of water-impermeable crust on sand surface using biocement. Cem Concr Res 41:1143–1149Google Scholar
  78. Temitopeab KJ, Olubunmiac OK, Olugbengaad A (2015) Strength of bamboo leaf ash and pulverized burnt clay waste blended cement concrete. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 12:36–42Google Scholar
  79. Thawadi SA, Ruwisch RC (2012) Calcium carbonate crystals formation by ureolytic bacteria isolated from Australian soil and sludge. J Adv Sci Eng Res 2:12–26Google Scholar
  80. Tittelboom KV, Belie ND, Muynck WD, Verstraete W (2010) Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Cem Concr Res 40:157–166Google Scholar
  81. Vasanthabharathi V (2017) Review on eco-friendly construction biotechnology. Int J Microbiol Res 8:25–28Google Scholar
  82. Vashisht R, Attri S, Sharma D, Shukla A, Goel G (2018) Monitoring biocalcification potential of Lysinibacillus sp. isolated from alluvial soils for improved compressive strength of concrete. Microbiol Res 207:226–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Veerappan K, Chandru P (2016) A brief review on biocement based concrete. Int J Eng Manage Res 6:142–144Google Scholar
  84. Vieira MC, Klemm D, Einfeldt L, Albrecht G (2005) Dispersing agents for cement based on modified polysaccharides. Cem Concr Res 35:883–890Google Scholar
  85. Vijay K, Murmu M, Deo SV (2017) Bacteria based self healing concrete-a review. Constr Build Mater 152:1008–1014Google Scholar
  86. Voicu G, Badanoiu AI, Andronescu E (2016) Biocements with potential endodontic use. In: Nanobiomaterials in dentistry. William Andrew Publishing, Kidlington/Oxford, pp 79–106Google Scholar
  87. Wang J, Van Tittelboom K, De Belie, Verstraete W (2012) Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 26:532–540Google Scholar
  88. Wei S, Cui H, Jiang Z, Liu H, He H, Fang N (2015) Biomineralization processes of calcite induced by bacteria isolated from marine sediments. Braz J Microbiol 46:455–464PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Xu J, Yao W, Jiang Z (2014) Non-ureolytic bacterial carbonate precipitation as a surface treatment strategy on cementitious materials. J Mater Civ Eng 26:983–991Google Scholar
  90. Xu J, Wang X, Zuo J, Liu X (2018) Self-healing of concrete cracks by ceramsite-loaded microorganisms. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:5153041Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hesham El Enshasy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Daniel Joe Dailin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roslinda Abd Malek
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nurul Zahidah Nordin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ho Chin Keat
    • 1
  • Jennifer Eyahmalay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Santosh Ramchuran
    • 4
  • Jimmy Ngow Chee Ghong
    • 5
  • Veshara Malapermal Ramdas
    • 6
  • Rajesh Lalloo
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Bioproduct Development (IBD)Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)Johor BahruMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Chemical Engineering and Energy, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)Johor BahruMalaysia
  3. 3.Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research InstituteCity of Scientific Research and Technology Applications (CSAT)New Burg Al Arab AlexandriaEgypt
  4. 4.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Bioprocess Development GroupPretoriaSouth Africa
  5. 5.Huashi Malaysia Sdn. BhdKuala LumpurMalaysia
  6. 6.School of Life SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations