Abstract
This study demonstrates the method to achieve energy savings in the construction of buildings by using LCA techniques for the selection of sustainable ingredients of concrete. The study integrates technological aspect with environmental, social, and economic aspects. In this study, the effects of various sustainable factors on sustainable criteria including technological aspect such as practicability, recyclability, innovative technology, etc., are evaluated by passing the material through the life cycle process. Five coarse aggregate materials are passed through life cycle stages (preconstruction, construction, and postconstruction stages). Based on the effects of various alternatives on sustainable factors, a sustainable coarse aggregate material is selected. The importance of sustainable factors was identified and the material alternative is prioritized using Preference Selection Index (PSI) method. This approach can be implemented in any material alternatives to select the best material. The results of the study reveal that sintered fly ash aggregate has a higher PSI value (0.943) ten crushed gravel a has lower PSI value (0.903). The final ranking of coarse aggregate by using the PSI method is Sintered fly ash > Granulated blast slag > Bloated clay > Recycled from demolition waste > Crushed gravel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
UNFPA (2007) The state of the world population 2007—unleashing the potential of urban growth. Population, poverty and economic development, pp 1–34
Bhatia N (2014) Life cycle assessment as a tool for material selection—a comparison of autoclaved aerated concrete and VSBK Brick Wall Assembly. In: 30th international PLEA conference, December, pp 1–8
Ding GKC (2008) Sustainable construction—the role of environmental assessment tools. J Environ Manage 86(3):451–464
Keeble BR (1988) The Brundtland report: ‘our common future’. Med War 4(1):17–25
Reddy AS, Kumar PR, Raj PA (2019) Developing a Material Sustainable Performance Score (MSPS) to select an alternative cementitious material. Cem Wapno Bet 24(1):68–79
Bansal N, Shrivastava V, Singh J (2015) Smart urbanization—key to sustainable cities. Real Corp 2015, vol 2, May, pp 551–560
Reddy AS, Kumar PR, Raj PA (2019) Preference-based multi-criteria framework for developing a Sustainable Material Performance Index (SMPI). Int J Sustain Eng, 1–14
Flower DJM, Sanjayan JG (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions due to concrete manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(5):282–288
Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 11251 Roger Bacon Drive, and V. 20190 Reston (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practice, May, pp 1–88
Sabai SMM, Lichtenberg JJN, Cox MGDM, Mato RR, Egmond ELC (2014) Sustainable approach for recycling construction and demolition waste into building material in Tanzania, pp 88–105
Mahmoudkelaye S et al (2017) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. J Clean Prod 2(1):1–11
Calkins M (2008) Materials for sustainable sites defined
Maniya K, Bhatt MG (2010) A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: preference selection index method. Mater Des 31(4):1785–1789
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Arukala, S.R., Kalpande, V.P., Pancharathi, R.K. (2020). Evaluation of Sustainable Material Through Life Cycle Assessment Using PSI Method. In: Pancharathi, R., Sangoju, B., Chaudhary, S. (eds) Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 68. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3361-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3361-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3360-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3361-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)