Advertisement

Trichoderma pp 221-250 | Cite as

Deployment of Trichoderma for the Management of Tea Diseases

  • Pranab Dutta
  • R. P. Bhuyan
  • Pratibha Sharma
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads
Part of the Rhizosphere Biology book series (RHBIO)

Abstract

Tea, Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze, is considered as one of the important plantation crops that has a great role in the GDP of the nation. Tea leaves contain more than 700 chemicals, among which flavonoids, amino acids, vitamins, caffeine and polysaccharides are beneficial to human health. They also improve the beneficial intestinal microflora, provide immunity against intestinal disorders and protect cell membranes from oxidative damage. The crop is infected by various diseases at different stages of the crop. Many of the diseases can be curbed through biological approaches, more particularly using Trichoderma spp. In this chapter we have discussed the works on potential use of Trichoderma spp. for the management of tea diseases, mode of action of Trichoderma against the pathogens causing tea diseases and the role of different biotic and abiotic factors on Trichoderma spp. leading to a successful result.

Keywords

Trichoderma Tea Disease 

References

  1. Altomare C, Norvell WA, Björkman T, Harman GC (1999) Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant-growth promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2926–2933PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RD, Baily BA, Taylor R, Sharon A, Avni A, Mattoo AK, Fuchs Y (1993) Fungal xylanase elicits ethylene biosynthesis and other defense responses in tobacco. In: Pech JC, Latche A, Balague C (eds) Cellular and molecular aspects of the plant hormone ethylene. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2012) Reporter, B S (17 October 2012). Assam cabinet’s nod to tea as ‘state drink’ of Assam. Business Standard India. Accessed 12 Feb 2019Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous (2013a) Archived copy. Archived from the original on 29 Oct 2013. Accessed 25 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous (2013b) India to declare tea national drink in 2013. The Times of India. Archived from the original on 30 May 2013Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous (2013c) Tea to get hotter with national drink tag? - Times of India. The Times of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Anonymous (2014) Tea Board of India. Indian Tea culture. Govt. of India. Retrieved 6 Oct 2014Google Scholar
  8. Baby UI, Chandra Mouli B (1996) Biological antagonism of Trichoderma and Gliocladium spp. against certain primary root pathogens of tea. J Plantation Crops 24(Suppl):249–255Google Scholar
  9. Baby UI, Premkumar R, Ajay D, Sanjay R, Sasidhar R (2004) Chemical and biological control of red root disease. Newsl UPASI Tea Res Foundation 14(2):1–2Google Scholar
  10. Baker KF, Snyder WC (1965) Ecology of soil-borne plant pathogens: prelude to biological control, vol 100. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p 224Google Scholar
  11. Balasuriya A (1998) Report of the plant pathology division. Annual Report of Tea Research Institute, Sri Lanka. pp 88–89Google Scholar
  12. Balasuriya A (2001) Report of the plant pathology division. Annual Report of Tea Research Institute, Sri Lanka. p 128Google Scholar
  13. Balasuriya A (2005) Report of the plant pathology division, Annual Report of Tea Research Institute, Sri Lanka. p 177Google Scholar
  14. Bhagat RM, Baruah DR, Safique S (2010) Climate and tea, Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze production with special reference to north east India: a review. J Environ Res Dev 4(4):1017–1028Google Scholar
  15. Bissett J (1991a) A revision of the genus Trichoderma. II. Infrageneric classification. Can J Bot 69:2357–2372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bissett J (1991b) A revision of the genud Trichoderma. III. Section Pachybasium. Can J Bot 69:2373–2417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bues R, Bussieres P, Dadomo M, Dumas Y, Garcia-Pomar MI, Lyannaz JP (2004) Assessing the environmental impacts of pesticides used on processing tomato crops. Agric Eco Environ 102:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caldwell R (1958) Fate of spores of Trichoderma viride Pers. Ex Fr. introduced into soil. Nature 181:1144–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carr MKV (1972) The climatic requirements of the tea plant: a review. Exp Agric 8:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carreiro MM, Koske RE (1992) Effect of temperature on decomposition and development of microfungal communities in leaf litter microcosms. Can J Bot 70:2177–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chakrabarty U, Chakrabarty BN, Chakrabarty AP, Sunar K, Dey PL (2013) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria mediated improvement of health status of tea plants. Ind J Biotechnol 12:20–31Google Scholar
  22. Chet I, Baker R (1980) Induction of suppressiveness to Rhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology 70:994–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen SK, Edwards CA, Subler S (2001) A microcosm approach for evaluating the effects of the fungicides benomyl and captan on soil ecological processes and plant growth. Appl Soil Ecol 18:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chet I (1990) Biological control of soilborne pathogens with fungal antagonists in combination with soil treatment. In: Hornby D, Cook RJ, Henis Y, Ko WH, Rovira AD, Schippers B, Scott PR (eds) Biological control of soilborne pathogens. CAB Publishing House, New York, pp 15–25Google Scholar
  25. Chet I, Baker R (1981) Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma hamatum from soil naturally suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 71:286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chet I, Harman GE, Baker R (1981) Trichoderma hamatum: its hyphal interactions with Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium spp. Microbiol Ecol 7:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clarkson JP, Mead A, Payne T, Whipps JM (2004) Effect of environmental factors and Sclerotium cepivorum isolate on sclerotial degradation and biological control of white rot by Trichoderma. Plant Pathol 53:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Danielson RM, Davey CB (1973) Non nutritional factors affecting the growth of Trichoderma in culture. Soil Biol Biochem 5:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davet P (1979) Technique pour l’analyse des populations de Trichoderma et de Gliocladium virens dans le sol. Ann Phytopathol 11:524–533Google Scholar
  30. De Meyer G, Bigirimana J, Elad Y, Hofte M (1998) Induced systemic resistance in Trichoderma harzianum biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea. Eur J Plant Pathol 104:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dhaliwal GS, Koul O (2010) Quest for pest management: from green revolution to gene revolution. Kalyani Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  32. Dileep Kumar BS, Mishra AK, Dutta S (2005) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in suppression of root diseases of tea. International Symposium on Integrated Management of Fungal Diseases. Section-II. p 23Google Scholar
  33. Dix N, Webster J (1995) Fungal ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, p 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH (1980) Compendium of soil fungi, vol 1. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Dutta P, Kaushik H, Puzari KC, Bhuyan RP (2016) Ecofriendly management of tea diseases in current scenario of climate change. In: Dynamics in crop protection and climate change. Publ. Studera Press, New Delhi, pp 325–340Google Scholar
  36. Dutta P, Kakati N, Das A, Kaushik H, Boruah S, Bhowmick P, Kaman P, Bhuyan RP, Hazarika GN (2017) Trichoderma pseudokoningii showed compatibility with certain commonly used inorganic pesticides, fertilizer and sticker cum spreaders. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6(2):140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Eastburn DM, Butler EE (1988) Microhabitat characterization of Trichoderma harzianum in natural soil: evaluation of factors affecting population density. Soil Biol Biochem 20:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eastburn DM, Butler EE (1991) Effects of soil moisture and temperature on the saprophytic ability of Trichoderma harzianum. Mycologia 83:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Eden T (1976) Tea, 93rd edn. Longman Group, London, p 236Google Scholar
  40. Elad Y, Kapat A (1999) The role of Trichoderma harzianum protease in the biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y (1983) Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii. Scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology 73:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Elad Y, Chet I, Baker R (1987) Increased growth response of plants induced by rhizobacteria antagonistic to soilborne pathogenic fungi. Plant Soil 98:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Elad Y, David DR, Levi T, Kapat A, Kirshner B, Guvrin E, Levine A (1999) Trichoderma harzianum T-39 mechanisms of biocontrol of foliar pathogens. In: Lyr H (ed) Modern fungicides and antifungal compounds II. Intercept Ltd., Andover, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  44. FAO (1999) FAO yearbook of production Vol 52, 1998. FAO Statistic Series No. 148. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 170Google Scholar
  45. Gams W, Bissett J (1998) Morphology and identification of Trichoderma. In: Kubicek CP, Harman GE (eds) Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  46. Gerhardson B (2002) Biological substitutes for pesticides. Trends Biotechnol 20:338–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ghisalberti EL, Narbey MJ, Dewan MM, Sivasithaparam K (1990) Variability among strains of Trichoderma harzianum in their ability to reduce take all and to produce pyrones. Plant Soil 121(20):281–291Google Scholar
  48. Gochenaur SE, Backus MP (1967) Mycoecology of willow and cotton-wood lowland communities in southern Wisconsin. II. Soil microfungi in the sandbar willow stands. Mycologia 59:893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gracia-Garza JA, Reeleder RD, Paulitz TC (1997) Degradation of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by fungus gnats (Bradysia coprophila) and the biocontrol fungi Trichoderma spp. Soil Biol Biochem 29:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hagn A, Geue H, Pritsch K, Schloter M (2002) Assessment of fungal diversity and community structure in agricultural used soils. Research Signpost, Kerala, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  51. Hagn A, Pritsch K, Schloter M, Munch JC (2003) Fungal diversity in agricultural soil under different farming management systems, with special reference to biocontrol strains of Trichoderma spp. Biol Fertil Soils 38:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Haran S, Schickler H, Oppenheim A, Chet I (1996a) Molecular mechanisms of lytic enzymes involved in the biocontrol activity of Trichoderma harzianum. Microbiology 142:2321–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Haran S, Schickler H, Oppenheim A, Chet I (1996b) Differential expression of Trichoderma harzianum chitinases during mycoparasitism. Phytopathology 86:980–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harman GE (2000) Myths and dogmas of biocontrol: changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Dis 84:377–393PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hazarika DK, Phookan A (2003) Combination of Glomus fasciculatum with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma harzianum: effect on biocontrol potential and growth promotion in tea seedling. Sixth International Workshop on PGPR, IISR Calicut. pp 289–294Google Scholar
  56. Hazarika DK, Phookan AK, Saikia GK, Borthakur BK, Sarma D (2000) Management of charcoal stump rot of tea with biocontrol agents. J Plant Crop 28(2):149–153Google Scholar
  57. Henis Y, Papavizas GC (1983) Factors affecting germinability and susceptibility to attack of sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii by Trichoderma harzianum in field soil. Phytopathology 73:1469–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hewitt HG (1998) Fungicides in crop protection, 1st edn. C.A.B International, Wallingford, OxonGoogle Scholar
  59. Hjeljord L, Tronsmo A (1998) Trichoderma and Gliocladium in biological control: an overview. In: Kubicek CP, Harman GE (eds) Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  60. Howell CR (1998) The role of antibiosis in biocontrol. In: Harman GE, Kubicek CP (eds) Trichoderma and Glioladium, vol 2. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 173–184Google Scholar
  61. Howell CR (2003) Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis 87:4–10PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Howell CR, Stipanovic RD, Lumsden RD (1993) Antibiotic production by strains of Gliocladium virens and its relation to the biocontrol of cotton seedling diseases. Biocontrol Sci Tech 3:435–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jeyarajan R, Nakeeran S (2000) Exploitation of microorganisms and virus as biocontrol agents for crop disease management. In: Upadhyay RK et al (eds) Biocontrol potential and its exploitation in sustainable agriculture. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kay SJ, Stewart A (1994) Evaluation of fungal antagonists for control of onion white rot in soil box trials. Plant Pathol 43:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Killham K (1994) Soil ecology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kleifeld O, Chet I (1992) Trichoderma harzianum – interaction with plants and effect on growth response. Plant Soil 144:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Klein D, Eveleigh E (1998) Ecology of Trichoderma. In: Kubicek CP, Harman GE (eds) Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 57–69Google Scholar
  68. Knudsen IMB, Hockenhull J, Jensen DF, Gerhardson B, Hokeberg M, Tahvonen R, Teperi E, Sundheim L, Henriksen B (1997) Selection of biological control agents for controlling soil and seed-borne diseases in the field. Eur J Plant Pathol 103:775–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lewis JA, Lumsden RD (2001) Biocontrol of damping-off of greenhouse-grown crops caused by Rhizoctonia solani with a formulation of Trichoderma spp. Crop Prot 20:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lewis JA, Papavizas GC (1984) A new approach to stimulate population proliferation of Trichoderma species and other potential biocontrol fungi introduced into natural soils. Phytopathology 74:1240–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lockwood JL (1977) Fungistasis in soils. Biol Rev 52:1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lorito M, Farkas V, Rebuffat S, Bodo B, Kubicek CP (1996) Cell wall synthesis is a major target of mycoparasitic antagonism by Trichoderma harzianum. J Bacteriol 178:6382–6385PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lui S, Baker R (1980) Mechanism of biological control in soil suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 70:404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lumsden RD, Locke JC, Adkins ST, Walter JF, Ridout C (1992) Isolation and localization of the antibiotic gliotoxin produced by Gliocladium virens from alginate prill in soil and soilless media. Phytopathology 82:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McLean KL, Stewart A (2000) Application strategies for control of onion white rot by fungal antagonists. N Z J Crop Hort Sci 28:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mcspadden Gardner BB, Fravel DR (2002) Biological control of plant pathogens: research, commercialization, and application in the USA. Plant Health Prog.  https://doi.org/10.1049/PHP-2002-0510-01-RV
  77. Melero-Vara JM, Prados-Ligero AM, Basallote-Ureba MJ (2000) Comparison of physical, chemical and biological methods of controlling garlic white rot. Eur J Plant Pathol 106:581–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ousley MA, Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1994) Potential of Trichoderma spp. as consistent plant growth stimulators. Biol Fertil Soils 17:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Papavizas GC (1981) Survival of Trichoderma harzianum in soil and in pea and bean rhizosphere. Phytopathology 71:121–125Google Scholar
  80. Papavizas GC (1982) Survival of Trichoderma harzianum in soil and in pea and bean rhizosphere. Phytopathology 72:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Papavizas GC (1985) Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:23–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Papavizas GC, Dunn MT, Lewis JA, Beagle-Ristaino J (1984) Liquid fermentation technology for experimental production of biocontrol fungi. Phytopathology 74:1171–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Parkinson D, Taylor GS, Pearson R (1963) Studies on fungi in the root region. I. The development of fungi on young roots. Plant Soil 19:322–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Paulitz TC (2000) Population dynamics of biocontrol agents and pathogens in soils and rhizospheres. Eur J Plant Pathol 106:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Persoon CH (1794) Disposition methodica fungorum. Römer’s neues. Magazin Botanische 1:81–128Google Scholar
  86. Pittendrigh BR, Gaffney PJ (2001) Pesticide resistance: can we make it a renewable resource? J Theor Biol 211:365–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ponmurugan P, Baby UI (2003) In vitro interaction of fungal antagonists with Phomopsis theae, the causal agent of collar canker disease in tea. Indian J Microbiol 43:41–44Google Scholar
  88. Ponmurugan P, Baby UI, Premkuma R, Radhakrishnan B (2002) Integrated control of Phomopsis Canker disease of tea. Proceedings of Placrosym XV. pp 599–602Google Scholar
  89. Premkumar R, Baby UI (2005) Recommendations on the control of root and stem diseases of tea. Handbook of Tea Culture. Section 15/16Google Scholar
  90. Punja ZK, Utkhede RS (2003) Using fungi and yeasts to manage vegetable crop diseases. Trends Biotechnol 21:400–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Purseglove JW (1968) Tropical crops: dicotyledons 2. Longmans, London, pp 599–612Google Scholar
  92. Rifai MA (1969) A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycol Pap 116:1–56Google Scholar
  93. Roiger DJ, Jeffer SN, Caldwell RW (1991) Occurrence of Trichoderma species in apple orchard and woodland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 23:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Samuels GJ (1996) Trichoderma: a review of biology and systematic of the genus. Mycol Res 100:923–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sarkar A, Das RC, Rashid MH, Ali M, Islam MS, Asaed T, Wang Q (2015) Biocontrol potentiality of isolates of Trichoderma spp. against Pestalozzia theae Saw. in tea. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hungarica 50(2):179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schirmbock M, Lorito M, Wang Hayes YL (1994) Parallel formation and synergism of hydrolytic enzymes and peptaibol antibiotics, molecular mechanisms involved in the antagonism action of Trichoderma harzianum against phytopathogenic fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(12):4364–4370PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Schoeman MW, Webber JF, Dickinson DJ (1996) The effect of diffusible metabolites of Trichoderma harzianum on in vitro interactions between basidiomycete isolates at two different temperature regimes. Mycol Res 100:1454–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schroth MN, Hancock JG (1982) Disease-suppressive and root colonizing bacteria. Science 216:1376–1381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalbert EL (1998) Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma and Glioladium. In: Kubicek CP, Harman GE (eds) Trichoderma and Glioladium, vol 1. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 139–191Google Scholar
  100. Steyaert JM, Ridgway HJ, Elad Y, Stewart A (2003) Genetic basis of mycoparasitism: a mechanism of biological control by species of Trichoderma. N Z J Crop Hort Sci 31:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Storey GK, Gardner WA (1987) Vertical movement of commercially formulated conidia of the entomogenous fungus, Beauveraibassiana in four Georgia soil types. Environ Entomol 16:17–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thoudam R, Dutta B (2012) Control of black rot disease of tea (Camellia sinensis I (L.) O Kuntze) with the mycoflora isolated from tea environment and phyllosphere. J Mycopathol Res 50:205–210Google Scholar
  103. Tronsmo A, Dennis C (1978) Effect of temperature on antagonistic properties of Trichoderma species. Trans Br Mycol Soc 71:469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wardle A, Parkinson D, Waller JE (1993) Interspecific competitive interaction between pairs of fungal species in natural substrates. Ecologia 94:165–172Google Scholar
  105. Weindling R (1932) Trichoderma lignorumas a parasite of other fungi. Phytopathology 22:837–845Google Scholar
  106. Weindling R (1941) Experimental consideration of the mold toxins of Gliocladium and Trichoderma. Phytopathology 31:991–1003Google Scholar
  107. Wilcox WF, Harman GE, Di Pietro A (1992) Effect of gliotoxin on growth, sporulation, and zoospores motility of seven Phytophthora spp in vitro. Phytopathology 82:1121Google Scholar
  108. Windham MT, Elad Y, Baker R (1986) A mechanism for increased plant growth induced by Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 76(5):518–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pranab Dutta
    • 1
  • R. P. Bhuyan
    • 2
  • Pratibha Sharma
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Crop Protection, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural SciencesCentral Agricultural University (Imphal)UmiamIndia
  2. 2.Department of Tea Husbandry and TechnologyAssam Agricultural UniversityJorhatIndia
  3. 3.Division of Plant PathologyICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations