Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problem-Solving

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating Change to Improve Science and Mathematics Education

  • 319 Accesses

Abstract

Implementing problem-solving is one of the core objectives of Hong Kong’s Learning to Learn project. Hong Kong recognizes the fundamental importance of problem-solving in math and science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American College Testing [ACT], Inc. (2007). Rigor at risk: Reaffirming quality in the high school core curriculum. Iowa City, IA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. B., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R., & Simon, H. (1977). Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics. Cognitive Science, 1(2), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindset: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon, G. (1777). Essai d’arithmĂ©tique morale. Histoire naturelle, gĂ©nĂ©rale er particulière, SupplĂ©ment, 4, 46–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camillia, G., & Dossey, J. (2019). Multidimensional national profiles for TIMSS 2007 and 2011 mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior [Online First]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.02.001.

  • Chaitin, G. J. (1998). The limits of mathematics: A course on information theory and the limits of formal reasoning. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Q. P. (2017). Break the convention: A question in the interview. School Mathematics Newsletter, 21, 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisco Systems. (2019). Expert certification. Retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/training-events/training-certifications/certifications/expert.html.

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2016). Mathematical standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf.

  • CsapĂł, B., & Funke, J. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of problem solving: Using research to inspire 21st century learning, educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A. (1973). Psychology of problem solving: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossey, J., Mullis, I., Lindquist, M., & Chambers, D. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Trends and achievements based on the 1986 national assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). The process of solving complex problems. Journal of Problem Solving, 4(1), Article 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1118.

  • Fortunato, I., Hecht, D., Tittle, C. K., & Alvarez, L. (1991). Metacognition and problem solving. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39(4), 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Complex problem solving: The European perspective. New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. (2013, October 22). The Shanghai secret. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/23/opinion/friedman-the-shanghai-secret.html?_r=0.

  • Fung, C. Y. (2014). Mathematical knowledge is “autocratic”. School Mathematics Newsletter, 18, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J., & Frensch, P. A. (2007). Complex problem solving: The European perspective - 10 years after. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 25–47). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadidov, B. (2017, April). Predicting highly qualified math teachers in secondary schools in the United States. Paper presented at SAS Global Forum, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobler, G. C. (2016a). Interdisciplinary Forensic Science Programme. Hong Kong Science Teachers’ Journal, 31, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobler, G. C. (2016b). Let our students teach! Teaching as a way of mastering knowledge. Hong Kong Teacher’s Journal, 32, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., & Krauskopf, C. J. (1987). An information-processing approach to personal problem solving. Counseling Psychologist, 15, 371–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, D. (2002). Arbitrary and Necessary: A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in secondary schools: A reader (pp. 47–63). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., … & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2018). HK Mathematics Creative Problem-Solving Competition. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/major-level-of-edu/gifted/resources_and_support/competitions/local/cps.html.

  • Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2016). Category A: Senior secondary subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/hkdse/assessment/subject_information/category_a_subjects/hkdse_subj.html?A1&1&4.

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, J. R., & Josephson, S. G. (Eds.). (1996). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. (2003). A brief history of American K-12 mathematics education in the 20th Century. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical Cognition (pp. 175–259). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E. (2004). Assessment of cross-curricular problem-solving competencies. In J. H. Moskowitz & M. Stephens (Eds.), Comparing learning outcomes: International assessments and education policy (pp. 81–107). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxman, K. (2013). Epistemology of well and ill structured problem solving. In Sebatien Helie (Ed.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. M. (2015). Geometrical probability and Bertrand’s Paradox. School Mathematics Newsletter, 19, 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. S. (2015). You will never get a zero in this exam no matter what your answer is. School Mathematics Newsletter, 19, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. (2018, June 21). Why our smartest students are failing math. Retrieved from https://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/why-americas-smartest-students-fail-math/.

  • Lockhart, P. (2009). A mathematician’s lament: How school cheats us out of our most fascinating and imaginative art. New York, NY: Bellevue Literary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinoff, L. (1994). A Resolution of Bertrand’s Paradox. Philosophy of Science, 61(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 287–303). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, J., Schroder, H. S., Heeter, C., Moran, T. P., & Lee, Y. H. (2011). Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mindset to adaptive post error adjustments. Psychological Science, 22, 1484–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2013a). Technical report of the survey of adult skills (PIAAC). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/_Technical%20Report_17OCT13.pdf.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2013b). The survey of adult skills: Reader’s companion. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204027-en.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en.

  • Polya, G. (1954a). Mathematic and plausible reasoning—Volume I: Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1954b). Mathematic and plausible reasoning—Volume II Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, L. (2017). The role of critical thinking in science education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8, 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1971). Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, 26(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. (2019). PISA and PIRLS: The effects of culture and school environment. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wai, M. Y. (2011). Further applications of mathematics: Explore Ptolemy’s theorem and its applications. School Mathematics Newsletter, 17, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenke, D., Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (2005). Complex problem solving and intelligence: Empirical relation and causal direction. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Pretz (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 160–187). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. Y., Marton, F., Wong, K. M., & Lam, C. C. (2002). The lived space of mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. W. (2018). STEM for parents. Hong Kong: Shing Tao Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. E., & Worrell, F. C. (2018). Comparing metacognition assessments of mathematics in academically talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., Anthony, S, & Behrens, J. T. (1995, April). Identification of misconceptions in learning central limit theorem and evaluation of computer-based instruction as a remedial tool. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., DiGangi, S., & Jannasch-Pennell, A. (2008). The role of abductive reasoning in cognitive-based assessment. Elementary Education Online, 7(2), 310–322. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/index.php/io/article/view/1804/1640.

  • Yu, C. H., Lee, H. S., Lara, E., & Gan, S. G. (2018). The ensemble and model comparison approaches for big data analytics in social sciences. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 23(17). Retrieved from https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=23&n=17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA

    Chong Ho Yu

  2. Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA

    Hyun Seo Lee

Authors
  1. Chong Ho Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyun Seo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yu, C.H., Lee, H.S. (2020). Problem-Solving. In: Creating Change to Improve Science and Mathematics Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3156-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3156-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3155-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3156-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation