Skip to main content

Examining the Influence of Individual, Social Cognitive and Environmental Factors on Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: Application of the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) Framework Within a Multidimensional Career Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship–Professionalism–Leadership

Abstract

Chan et al. (2011, 2012) proposed the Entrepreneurial, Professionalism, and Leadership (EPL) framework to characterize one’s lifelong career evolutions within the EPL dimensions. However, the current EPL framework does not specify how one’s EPL aspirations may develop, nor does it examine the relevant factors that may facilitate or hinder the development of EPL aspirations. This paper adopts the Social Cognitive Career Theory—to delineate how one’s career decisions—, as defined by the Entrepreneurial, Professionalism, and Leadership (EPL) career framework, can be facilitated and highlight factors that may affect the career choices. In particular, we examined the influence of individual, social cognitive, and environmental factors on the development of 396 university students’ entrepreneurial intentions and the process of career choice-making through structural equation modelling technique. Consistent with earlier findings, the results of this study found support for hypotheses concerning core SCCT variables (self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goals, and interests) while suggesting a need to include additional constructs (such as individual differences and contextual factors). Implications and suggestions for future research on the SCCT choice model and its application within the multidimensional EPL framework are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 3 single items for role model in EPL career domain were not included in the CFA analysis.

  2. 2.

    The EPL intent scale was represented by a 3 factors model whereas, the rest of the scales are unidimensional as proposed by the original developers.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., & Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Markman, G. D., & Hirsa, A. (2001). Perceptions of women and men as entrepreneurs: Evidence for differential effects of attributional augmenting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baughn, C., Cao, J. R., Le, L., Lim, V. A., & Neupert, K. E. (2006). Normative, social and cognitive predictors of entrepreneurial interest in China, Vietnam and the Philippines. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

  • Bhasin, B. B. (2007). Fostering entrepreneurship: Developing a risk-taking culture in Singapore. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2008). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2007 executive report. London: London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., Tramayne, S., Hoxha, D., Telender, K., Fan, X., & Lent, R. W. (2008). Social cognitive predictors of college students’ academic performance and persistence: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00043-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preference and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F. M., & Kritikos, A. S. (2009). Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs—New evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics, 32, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354–359. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. Y., Chernyshenko, O., Ho, M. H. R., & Chew, Y. G. (2011). Measuring entrepreneurial, professional, and leadership (EPL) career aspirations. In 15th European Association of Work & Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. Y., Ho, M. H. R., Chernyshenko, O., Bedford, O., Uy, M. A., Gomulya, D., Sam, Y. L., & Phan, W. M. J. (2012). Entrepreneurship, professionalism, leadership: a framework and measure for understanding boundaryless careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.05.001.

  • Charney, A., & Libecap, G. D. (2000, May 23). The impact of entrepreneurship education: an evaluation of the Berger Entrepreneurship program at the University of Arizona, 1985–1999. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1262343 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1262343. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network (SSRN) database.

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlosta, S., Patzelt, H., Klein, S. B., & Dormann, C. (2012). Parental role models and the decision to become self-employed: The moderating effect of personality. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9270-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, H. S., & Bedford, O. (2016). A qualitative exploration of fear of failure and entrepreneurial intent in Singapore. Journal of Career Development, 43(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315599255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. W., Davis, C. H., & Harnish, V. C. (1984). Do courses in entrepreneurship aid in new venture creation? Journal of Small Business Management, 22(2), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, D. E., Willow, J. P., & Metzler, J. N. (2002). Multidimensional fear of failure measurement: The performance failure appraisal inventory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. (1994). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial careers. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 19(2), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, A. (2010). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students in Finland: Implications for education. Advances in Management, 3(7), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N. A., & Guillen, A. (2006). Outcome expectations: Looking to the past and potential future. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(2), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00296.x.

  • Herranz, N., Krasa, S., & Villamil, A. P. (2019). Entrepreneurs, risk aversion, and dynamic firms. Journal of Political Economy, 123(5), 1133–1176. https://doi.org/10.1086/682678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, J., Grilo, I., Thurik, R., & van der Zwan, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21, 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0190-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Issues and implications for career research and practice. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(4), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M. H. R., Uy, M. A., Kang, B. N. Y., & Chan, K. Y. (2018). Impact of entrepreneurship training on entrepreneurial efficacy and alertness among adolescent youth. Frontiers in Education, 3, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modelling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indarti, N., Rostiani, R., & Nastiti, T. (2010). Underlying factors of entrepreneurial intentions among Asian students. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 4(2), 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L. (2009). The role of personality and filial piety in the career commitment process among Chinese University students. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/.

  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K., & Tsai, W. D. (2006). Entrepreneurship and risk aversion. Small Business Economics, 26, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-5603-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003) Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modelling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1.

  • Kihlstrom, R. R., & Laffont, J. J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurship theory of new firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 304–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N., Jr., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanchimba, C., Windsperger, J., & Fadairo, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk and incentives: The case of franchising. Small Business Economics, 50(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9885-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W. (2005). A social cognitive view of career development and counselling. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counselling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 101–127). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W. (2018). Future of work in the digital world: Preparing for instability and opportunity. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behaviour across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., et al. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In Brown, D. & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. W., & Hackett, G. (2006). Social cognitive career theory. In J. H. Greenhaus & G. A. Callanan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of career development (pp. 751–754). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2003a). Testing social cognitive interest and choice hypotheses across Holland types in Italian high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00057-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003b). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Paixao, M., Silva, J., & Leitao, L. (2010). Predicting occupational interests and choice aspirations in Portuguese high school students: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenburg, N. M., & Schwarz, T. V. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation among the youth of India: The impact of culture, education and environment. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135570701700102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, X., & Yang, Y. (2014). An evaluation of WLSMV and Bayesian methods for confirmatory factor analysis with categorical indicators. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 2(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maehr, M. L., & Videbeck, R. (1968). Predisposition to risk and persistence under varying reinforcement-success schedules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 181–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., Volery, T., Doss, N., & Thein, V. (1999). Factors influencing small business start-ups. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 5(2), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552559910274499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metheny, J. R. (2009). Family of origin influences on the career development of young adults: The relative contributions of social status and family support. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu.

  • Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25(3), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porfeli, E. J., Lee, B., & Weigold, I. K. (2012). A multidimensional measure of work valences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett, M., Shinnar, R., Toney, B., Llopis, F., & Fox, J. (2009). Explaining entrepreneurial intentions of university students: A cross cultural study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15(6), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910995443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualls, W. J., & Puto, C. P. (1989). Organizational climate and decision framing: An integrated approach to analyzing industrial buying decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, M., & do Paco, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial education: Relationship between education and entrepreneurial activity. Psicothema, 23(3), 453–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retna, K. S., & Jones, D. (2013). The “learning organisation” and Singapore culture. The Learning Organization, 20(4/5), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-06-2011-0036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. C. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0156-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. G., & Twomey, D. F. (1988). The long-term supply of entrepreneurs: Students’ career aspirations in relation to entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(4), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., Borgia, D., & Schoenfeld, J. (2002). Using social cognitive career theory to predict self-employment goals. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., Schoenfeld, J., & Borgia, D. (2007a). Using social cognitive career theory to enhance students’ entrepreneurial interests and goals. Proceedings of the Academy of Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., Schoenfeld, J., & Borgia, D. (2007b). Which classroom-related activities enhance students’ entrepreneurial interests and goals?: A social cognitive career theory perspective. Proceedings of the Academy of Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), The encyclopaedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su., R., Murdock, C. D., & Rounds, J. (2015). Person-environment fit. In P. J. Hartung, M. L. Savickas, & W. B. Walsh (Eds.), APA handbook of career intervention: vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 81–98). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14438-005.

  • Swanson, J. L., & Fouad, N. A. (2014). Career theory and practice: Learning through case studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Flores, M. (2010). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uy, M. A., Chan, K. Y., Sam, Y. L., Ho, M. H. R., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2015). Proactivity, adaptability and boundaryless career attitudes: The mediating role of entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken, H., Fry, F. L., & Stephens, P. (2006a). The influence of role models on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken, H., Stephens, P., Fry, F. L., & Silva, J. (2006b). Role model influences on entrepreneurial intentions: A comparison between USA and Mexico. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-0004-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., & Stenberg, R. (2004). Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. Annual Regional Science, 38(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-004-0193-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2013). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 664–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, W. L., & Rossmann, M. M. (1996). Lesson’s from life’s first teacher: The role of family in adolescent and adult readiness for school-to-work transition. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurial education. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x.

  • Xavier, S. R., Kelley, D., Kew, J., Herrington, M., & Vorderwulbecke, A. (2012). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2012 global report. Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org/report.

  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moon-Ho Ringo Ho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

List of Hypotheses Examined in Present Study

The present study aims to validate and extend earlier findings on the SCCT choice model by applying them within the entrepreneurship domain. The following hypotheses were formulated and tested:

H1:

Entrepreneurial efficacy is positively related to entrepreneurial outcome expectations (path 1 in Fig. 15.1).

H2:

Entrepreneurial efficacy and outcome expectations are positively related to entrepreneurial interest (paths 2 and 3).

H3:

Entrepreneurial interest is positively related to entrepreneurial intention (path 4).

H4:

Entrepreneurial efficacy and outcome expectations are positively related to entrepreneurial intention (paths 5 and 6).

H5a:

Learning experiences is positively related to entrepreneurial efficacy and entrepreneurial outcome expectations (paths 7 and 8).

H5b:

Learning experiences is positively related to entrepreneurial intention (path 15).

H6a.:

Risk aversion is negatively related to learning experiences (path 9).

H6b:

Risk aversion is negatively related to perceived family support (path 11).

H6c:

Risk aversion is negatively related to entrepreneurial intention (path 13).

H6d:

Risk aversion is negatively related to entrepreneurial efficacy (path 14).

H7a:

Exposure to entrepreneurial role models is positively related to learning experiences (path 10).

H7b:

Exposure to entrepreneurial role models is positively related to entrepreneurial intention (path 16).

H8a:

Perceived family support is positively related to entrepreneurial intention (path 12).

H8b:

Perceived family support is positively related to entrepreneurial efficacy (path 17).

Appendix 2

Entrepreneurial Efficacy Scale

Instructions: Please use the scale below and rate how confident you are to perform the following tasks successfully. Indicate your answer on the right of each statement.

Scale:

1

2

3

4

5

Not at all confident

A little confident

Moderately confident

Fairly confident

Extremely confident

1

Come up with ideas for products and services that may be needed in a market

1

2

3

4

5

2

Plan a business (including market analysis, pricing, finances/costs, marketing/sales)

1

2

3

4

5

3

Build a network of contacts or partners who will support my business

1

2

3

4

5

4

Manage the financial assets and performance of a company or firm

1

2

3

4

5

5

Start a firm and keep it growing

1

2

3

4

5

6

Identify opportunities to start-up viable businesses

1

2

3

4

5

7

Design an effective campaign for market new product or service

1

2

3

4

5

Appendix 3

Entrepreneurial Outcome Expectations Scale

Instructions: Please read each statement carefully and choose the one answer that best describes your agreement or disagreement using the scale below. There are no “right or wrong” answers. Please answer honestly and frankly. Indicate your answer on the right of each statement.

Scale:

1

2

3

4

5

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

1

Starting my own business allows me to provide work/service or a product that is uniquely mine

1

2

3

4

5

2

Starting a business allows me to create more work opportunities for my friends and relatives

1

2

3

4

5

3

Founding a business allows me to create more work opportunities for people in society

1

2

3

4

5

4

Being an entrepreneur provides me with the satisfaction that I desire at work

1

2

3

4

5

5

Being an entrepreneur allows me to meet with successful businessmen with whom I main gain valuable opportunities and experience

1

2

3

4

5

6

“Being my own boss” allow me to have the kind of working hours that I desire

1

2

3

4

5

7

Pursuing entrepreneurship allows me to pursue those leisure time activities and interests that I like

1

2

3

4

5

8

Being an entrepreneur provides me with the kind of lifestyle that I desire

1

2

3

4

5

Appendix 4

Entrepreneurial Intention Scale

Instructions: Please read each statement carefully and choose the one option that best describes your current feelings. There are no “right or wrong” answers. Please answer honestly and frankly. Indicate your answer on the right of each statement.

Scale:

1

2

3

4

5

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

1

I am definitely going to be an entrepreneur after my studies and am prepared to do anything to achieve that goal

1

2

3

4

5

2

I will start my business in the next 5 years

1

2

3

4

5

3

I do not see myself taking over any business or buying any franchise in the future

1

2

3

4

5

4

I have a viable business idea and intend to start my own business soon after graduation

1

2

3

4

5

5

I will start my business in the next 10 years

1

2

3

4

5

6

When I have enough work experience and finances, I am certain to start my own business

1

2

3

4

5

Appendix 5

Entrepreneurial Interest Scale

Do you have any interests in any of the following entrepreneurship activities?

Check (√) all that apply:

  1. a.

    I am interested to get information about how to setup my own business

  2. b.

    I am keen to talk to the potential partners/sponsors and get help from them to start my own business.

  3. c.

    I am interest to participate in any entrepreneurship-related seminars/workshops/trainings even though I need to pay for it.

Appendix 6

Learning Experiences Scale

Have you ever engaged in any of the following entrepreneurship activities?

Check (√) all that apply:

  • I have started or taken over a business that is still active today.

  • I have taken some entrepreneurship-related courses in my studies.

  • I have participated/enrolled in entrepreneurship training program(s)/workshop(s)/seminar(s) before.

  • I have participated in entrepreneurship-related contest(s) before. (e.g. Ideas.Inc business competition or any other contests).

Appendix 7

Risk Aversion Scale

Instructions: Please read each statement carefully and choose the one option that best describes your current feelings. There are no “right or wrong” answers. Please answer honestly and frankly. Indicate your answer on the right of each statement.

Scale:

1

2

3

4

5

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

1

I am a cautious person who generally avoids risks

1

2

3

4

5

2

I prefer to remain on a job that has problems that I know about rather than take the risks of working at a new job

1

2

3

4

5

3

I am not willing to take risks when choosing a job or a company to work for

1

2

3

4

5

4

I prefer a low risk/high security job with a steady salary over a job that offers high risks and high rewards

1

2

3

4

5

5

I always play it safe, even if it means occasionally losing out on a good opportunity

1

2

3

4

5

6

I view risk of losing a job to be avoided at all costs

1

2

3

4

5

Appendix 8

Perceived Family Support Scale

Instructions: Please answer the following questions about the family you grew up in.

  1. 1.

    To what extent has the family you grew up in given you information and contacts that helped you with your occupational choices?

    a. No information and/or contacts

    b. A little information and/or a few contacts

    c. Considerable information and/or many contacts

  2. 2.

    To what extent has the family you grew up in encouraged you to pursue your goals and/or plans for the future?

    a. No encouragement

    b. A little encouragement

    c. Considerable encouragement

  3. 3.

    To what extent has the family you grew up in been helpful when you have questions about educational or career-related issues?

    a. No help with questions

    b. A little help with questions

    c. Considerable help with questions

  4. 4.

    To what extent has the family you grew up in expressed pride in your educational or career-related accomplishments

    a. No expressed pride

    b. A little expressed pride

    c. Considerable expressed pride

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

E, KH., Ho, MH.R. (2020). Examining the Influence of Individual, Social Cognitive and Environmental Factors on Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: Application of the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) Framework Within a Multidimensional Career Space. In: Ho, M., Kennedy, J., Uy, M., Chan, KY. (eds) Entrepreneurship–Professionalism–Leadership. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3121-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics