Skip to main content

Economic Shocks and Uncertainties: How Do Firm Innovativeness Enable Supply Chain and Moderate Interdependence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Resilience

Abstract

This chapter studies effects of economic shocks on the productive performance of manufacturing firms at Vietnam using the firm level data from 2004 to 2008. The chapter also examines the effects of economic shocks on the productive performance of firms in terms of access to linkages, spillovers, and ownership structures in terms of foreign, private and public ownership. The economic shocks such as global financial crisis tends to have greater impact on domestic firms and SOEs. The findings suggest that the local private enterprises did not receive positive foreign horizontal and backward spillovers from the MNEs, while SOE horizontal linkages also failed to contribute to the improvement in output productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The figure of the average GDP growth rate is calculated from World Development Indicators, the World Bank.

  2. 2.

    VSIC (2007) is based on International Standard Industrial Classification revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4).

  3. 3.

    GDP deflators are constructed using information available from World Bank.

  4. 4.

    The econometric specification is adapted from Blundell and Bond (2000).

  5. 5.

    Smarzynska and Beata (2002), Pattnayak and Thangavelu (2011) used the foreign equity participation averaged over all firms in the same sector (weighted by each firm’s share in sectoral output), which would be more sensitive to the presence of foreign investment in the industry. However, the data limitation in the dataset only allowed us to capture the horizontal linkage as the foreign firm’s share in sectoral output.

  6. 6.

    αkj is constructed with the use of an input-output table on Vietnam in early 2000s, retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org.

  7. 7.

    The Herfindahl index is a concentration ratio which captures the level of competition in a market or industry by comparing market shares of firms using the relative firm size. A high Herfindahl index indicates the presence of firms with large market shares and hence, a lower level of competition in the industry. Correspondingly, a low Herfindahl index indicates firms each having low market share and thereby, implying a high level of competition.

  8. 8.

    It tests for heteroskedasticity in a linear regression model by checking whether the estimated variance of the residuals from a regression is dependent on the values of the independent variables. If the estimated variance is dependent on the covariates, FE estimates are preferred.

  9. 9.

    Also known as Hansen test, it tests for the validity of instrumental variables used by checking for correlation between the residuals and exogenous variables to affirm the exogeneity of the instrumental variables.

References

  • Adams F, Le Tran (2011) The competitiveness of Vietnam on the East Asian production ladder. Int J Bus Soc Sci 2(14):82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68:29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken BJ, Harrison AE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Am Econ Rev 89(3):605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (2000) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econ Rev 19:321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma S, Greenaway D, Wakelin K (2001) Who benefits from foreign direct investments in UK? Scottish J Polit Econ 48:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Görg H, Strobl E (2001) Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: a meta-analysis. Econ J 111:723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1998) Production functions: the search for identification. In: Griliches Z (ed) Practicing econometrics: essays in methods and application. Edward Elgar, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Havranek T, Irsova Z (2011) Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: Why results vary and what the true effect is. J Int Econ 85(2):234–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen H, Nguyen CM (2004) Preferential treatment in a transition economy: the case of state-owned enterprises in the textile and garment industry in Vietnam. Norwegian J Geogr 58:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Quoc Hoi (2008) Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in Vietnam: horizontal or vertical spillovers. Vietnam Development Forum, Hanoi, Vietnam. http://www.vdf.org.vn/workingpapers/vdfwp085.pdf

  • Lesher M, Miroudot S (2008) FDI spillovers and their interrelationship with trade, OECD Trade Directorate, OECD Trade Policy working paper 2008/01/01, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KE, Sinani E (2009) When and where does foreign direct investment generate positive spillovers? A meta-analysis. J Int Bus Stud 40(7):1075–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NA, Nguyen T, Le DT, Nguyen DC, Nguyen DN (2008) FDI in Vietnam: is there any evidence of technological spillover effects? DEPOCEN working paper series 2008/18, Development and Policies Research Center, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattnayak S, Thangavelu SM (2011) Backward linkages and technology spillovers in the presence of foreign firms: Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, (with Sanja S. Pattnayak). J Econ Stud 38:275–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska, Beata K (2002) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages, World Bank Working Paper, no.2923, The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thangavelu SM (2014) Globalization and performance of small and large firms: case of Vietnamese firms, in Chin Hee Hahn and Dionisus Narjoko edited, Globalization and Performance of Small and Large firms, ERIA Research Report 2013, No. 03, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran TC, Le XS, Nguyen KA (2008) Vietnam’s small and medium sized enterprises development: Characteristics, constraints and policy recommendations. In Lim H, (ed) SME in Asia and globalization, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-5, pp 323–364

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shandre Mugan Thangavelu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thangavelu, S.M., Anbumozhi, V. (2020). Economic Shocks and Uncertainties: How Do Firm Innovativeness Enable Supply Chain and Moderate Interdependence. In: Anbumozhi, V., Kimura, F., Thangavelu, S. (eds) Supply Chain Resilience. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2870-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics