Skip to main content

BIT Problem: Is There a Trade-off in the Performances of Blockchain Systems?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1156))

Abstract

Blockchain technology, as a revolutionary concept, born with Bitcoin, is triggering the start of a new era on information. It is generally recognized that the blockchain-based systems achieve high security in the process of information sharing in a distributed network, at the cost of low efficiency in terms of data throughput or high costs in consuming computational resources. A natural question we are interested in is whether there exists a trade-off principle between different performances of a blockchain system, which is also regarded as blockchain impossibility triangle (BIT) problem. In this paper, we propose an analysis method which can be used to verify the existence of the BIT. Our analysis method is composed of two layers. In the first layer the basic and core attributes are abstracted by building a consensus model, and in the second layer the analysis approach is designed to verify the existence of a BIT. Specifically, in the first layer, we firstly define a leaderless consensus model to quantitatively abstract the basic parameters in the process of system consensus, then three core attributes are justified to serve as the three vertices of the discussed triangle problem, namely security, cost, and efficiency. Based on the core attributes, we propose the credibility metric which measures the difficulty of achieving credible consensus for a given blockchain system. In the second layer, we analyze the existence of BIT, where we have demonstrated the conditions that a BIT exists and the conditions that the triangle does not exist. Finally, the proposed analysis method is applied in analyzing PoW based blockchain systems, where we have shown that there is no BIT problem in PoW based systems. Furthermore, the proposed analysis method can also help the blockchain developers in finding the promising directions of a new blockchain consensus mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biswas, S., Sharif, K., Li, F., Nour, B., Wang, Y.: A scalable blockchain framework for secure transactions in IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 6(3), 4650–4659 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brewer, E.: Cap twelve years later: how the “rules” have changed. Computer 45, 23–29 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castro, M., Liskov, B., et al.: Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 173–186 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 4, 2292–2303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Courtois, N.T., Bahack, L.: On subversive miner strategies and block withholding attack in bitcoin digital currency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.1718 (2014)

  6. Gervais, A., Karame, G.O., Wüst, K., Glykantzis, V., Ritzdorf, H., Capkun, S.: On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 3–16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. (TOPLAS) 4(3), 382–401 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Z., Luong, N.C., Wang, W., Niyato, D., Wang, P., Liang, Y.C., Kim, D.I.: A survey on blockchain: a game theoretical perspective. IEEE Access 7, 47615–47643 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng, Z., Ren, W., Cao, Y., You, Z.: Leaderless and leader-following consensus with communication and input delays under a directed network topology. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 41, 75–88 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamoto, S., et al.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  11. Natoli, C., Gramoli, V.: The balance attack against proof-of-work blockchains: the R3 testbed as an example. CoRR abs/1612.09426 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.09426

  12. Prokofieva, M., Miah, S.J.: Blockchain in healthcare. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 23, 1–22 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ren, L., Devadas, S.: Proof of space from stacked expanders. In: Hirt, M., Smith, A. (eds.) TCC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9985, pp. 262–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53641-4_11

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Salman, T., Zolanvari, M., Erbad, A., Jain, R., Samaka, M.: Security services using blockchains: a state of the art survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(1), 858–880 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sapirshtein, A., Sompolinsky, Y., Zohar, A.: Optimal selfish mining strategies in bitcoin. In: Grossklags, J., Preneel, B. (eds.) FC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9603, pp. 515–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Vukolić, M.: The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: proof-of-work vs. BFT replication. In: Camenisch, J., Kesdoğan, D. (eds.) iNetSec 2015. LNCS, vol. 9591, pp. 112–125. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei, P., Yuan, Q., Zheng, Y.: Security of the blockchain against long delay attack. In: Peyrin, T., Galbraith, S. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2018, Part III. LNCS, vol. 11274, pp. 250–275. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03332-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Chen, X., Wang, H.: Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 14(4), 352–375 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong, L., Wu, Q., Xie, J., Guan, Z., Qin, B.: A secure large-scale instant payment system based on blockchain. Comput. Secur. 84, 349–364 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China under Grant No. 61702090 and No. 61702084.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Chen, X. (2020). BIT Problem: Is There a Trade-off in the Performances of Blockchain Systems?. In: Zheng, Z., Dai, HN., Tang, M., Chen, X. (eds) Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems. BlockSys 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1156. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2777-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2777-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2776-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2777-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics