Abstract
Cancer is a major cause of death with its high levels of global burden and mortality. Globally, the cancer incidence and mortality varied across countries. When comparing it by global economic levels, the Global North shows relatively low mortality rate due to screening, early detection and development and availability of treatment therapy. Recently, anticancer drugs are becoming more expensive. However, it is questionable whether the high cost is well deserved. In general, anticancer agents are characterized by uncertain value and high cost. Access to high-cost anticancer drugs has become a major challenge in many countries because of the lack of insurance coverage and the resulting financially unaffordable cost to patients. Therefore, access to anticancer drugs is a common issue for both the Global South and North.
When it comes to availability, cancer patients in LMICs only have access to part of the listed anticancer drugs at high copayment or full cost, and access to these medicines is limited due to poorly available supply problems. Moreover, recently approved medicines targeting metastatic cancers are often unavailable or available only when patients are charged more. This leads to profound inequity in access to cancer medicines.
In terms of affordability, the upsurge of spending on cancer drugs has surpassed that of total health expenditures, especially in low-income countries. When the cost of cancer medicines becomes unaffordable and unsustainable, governments in low-income countries may reduce the procurement and supply of these medicines resulting in compromising the timely access to them. Furthermore, anticancer drugs are relatively more expensive in low-income countries when purchasing power is taken into account.
In order to solve the issues pertaining to the access to high-cost cancer medicines, high-income countries have adopted MEAs or a separate fund applicable to these medicines while LMICs have made efforts for the self-sufficiency of medicines, such as through compulsory licensing and adopted free donation and second brands with lowered price.
Although the universal healthcare system assures access to cancer medicines, its sustainability is challenged. Since the high price of anticancer drugs is a barrier to access to cancer medicines in all countries, it is necessary for governments and stakeholders to implement policies to regulate the price of cancer medicines at an affordable level by guaranteeing reasonable profits through regional and global cooperation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
HDI (Human Development Index): It is created by the United Nations Development Programme to highlight the importance of national policy decisions beyond economic growth in assessing development outcomes (United Nations Development Programme 2016). HDI can help identify cancer transitions and four-tier HDI was used to further assess the cancer burden according to a binary proxy of development (low and medium HDI vs. high and very high HDI).
- 2.
The Global North indicates high-income countries including the USA, Canada, Europe, developed parts of Asia (Japan, the Four Asian Tigers, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan), Australia and New Zealand.
- 3.
- 4.
The markets include China, Brazil, India, Russia, Mexico, Turkey, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Egypt, Philippines, Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Argentina, Algeria, Colombia, South Africa, Chile, Nigeria and Kazakhstan, which were defined as pharmerging markets characterized by less than $30 k GDP per capita and greater than $1bn absolute prescription medicines market growth potential between 2014 and 2019 (World Health Organization 2018b).
References
World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: [Internet]. [cited 2018a Jan 21]. http://who.int/gho/database/en
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2018;68(6):394–424. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207593
World Health Organization. New Global Cancer Country Profiles [Internet]. https://www.who.int/cancer/country-profiles/en
Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends - An update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):16–27.
Hoen E, Access to cancer treatment: A study of medicine pricing issues with recommendations for improving access to cancer medication, Oxfam. 2014. https://www.ciaonet.org/attachments/27387/uploads
Economist Intelligence Unit. Breakaway: The global burden of cancer—challenges and opportunities. Econ. 2009;1–73.
World Health Organization. Metrics: Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) [Internet]. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/metrics_daly/en/
Richardson E. Health Policy Brief: Biosimilars. Heal Policy Br. 2013
Quintiles IMS Institute. Global Oncology Trends 2017: Advances, complexity & cost. 2017 May;1–47
Annadurai K, Danasekaran R, Mani G Personalized medicine: A paradigm shift towards promising health care. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8(1):77–8.
Alsaab HO, Sau S, Alzhrani R, Tatiparti K. PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy : Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2017;8(August):1–15.
Sacca L. The uncontrolled clinical trial: scientific, ethical, and practical reasons for being. Intern Emerg Med. 5(3):201–4.
Prasad V, Kim C, Burotto M, Vandross A. The Strength of Association Between Surrogate End Points and Survival in Oncology. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1389–98.
Cohen D. Cancer drugs: High price, uncertain value. BMJ [Internet]. 2017;359(October):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j454315.
FDA increasingly approves drugs without conclusive proof they work [Internet]. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/fda-increasingly-approves-drugs-without-conclusive-proof-they-work
Madersbacher S, Kramer G. Re: Availability of Evidence of Benefits on Overall Survival and Quality of Life of Cancer Drugs Approved by European Medicines Agency: Retrospective Cohort Study of Drug Approvals 2009–2013. Eur Urol. 2018;73(4):635–6.
Salas-Vega S, Iliopoulos O, Mossialos E. Assessment of overall survival, quality of life, and safety benefits associated with new cancer medicines. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(3):382–90.
World Health Organization. Technical report: pricing of cancer medicines and its impacts: a comprehensive technical report for the World Health Assembly [Internet]. 2018b. 112 p. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/277190
Fojo T, Grady C. How much is life worth: Cetuximab, non-small cell lung cancer, and the $440 billion question. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(15):1044–8.
Siddiqui M, Rajkumar SV. The High Cost of Cancer Drugs and What We Can Do About It. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(10):935–43.
Institute for New Economic Thinking. Working Paper No.60: US Pharma’s Financialized Business Model. 2017(July 13);649186(60).
WHO Regional Office for Africa. Assessment of Medicine Pricing and Reimbursement Systems in Health Insurance Schemes in Selected African Countries. July 2016 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246416/9789290233145-eng.pdf?sequence=1
Lopes G, Vulto A, Wilking N, van Harten W, Meier K, Simoens S. Potential Solutions for Sustaining the Costs of Cancer Drugs. Eur Oncol Haematol [Internet]. 2017;13(02):102. http://www.touchoncology.com/articles/potential-solutions-sustaining-costs-cancer-drugs
Lin D, Lee SY, Makarov D V., Levy BP, Grossbard ML, Becker DJ. Exploration of the ASCO and ESMO value frameworks for cancer drugs. J Clin Oncol. 2018;34(15_suppl):6512–6512.
Gammie T, Lu CY, Ud-Din Babar Z. Access to orphan drugs: A comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):1–24.
World Health Organization. Access to essential medicines as part of the right to health [Internet]. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/human_rights/en/
WHO. Essential Medicines [Internet]. https://www.who.int/medicines/services/essmedicines_def/en/
Perehudoff SK, Toebes B, Hogerzeil H. Essential medicines in national constitutions: Progress since 2008. Health Hum Rights. 2016;18(1):141–56.
Bigdeli M, Jacobs B, Tomson G, Laing R, Ghaffar A, vDujardin B, et al. Access to medicines from a health system perspective. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(7):692–704.
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). ACCESS TO MEDICINES: Medicines supply: Lessons learnt in Tanzania and Mozambique: A capitalisation report established in the frame of the SDC Backstopping Mandate 2004 of the Social Development Division’s Health Desk. 2004: 1–16
World Health Organization/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2018).POLICY BRIEF 30: Ensuring access to medicines: How to redesign pricing, reimbursement and procurement? 2018: 1–36. http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/
Zaheer Babar, Gammie T, Seyfoddin A, Hasan SS, Curley LE. Patient access to medicines in two countries with similar health systems and differing medicines policies: Implications from a comprehensive literature review. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2019;15(3):231–43.
Blauvelt B, Jazieh AR, McClung M, Eniu A, Zafar Y, Carlson R, et al. Facing the Global Challenges of Access to Cancer Medication. J Glob Oncol. 2018;(4):1–7.
Rickwood S. Prescription medicines trends: an overview and perspective on two therapy areas. 2017; Available from: https://www.who.int/phi/2-SarahRickwood.pdf
Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Torode J, Saar M, Eniu A. ESMO European Consortium Study on the availability, out-of-pocket costs and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines in Europe. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1423–43.
Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Torode J, Saar M, Eniu A. ESMO International Consortium Study on the availability, out-of-pocket costs and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines in countries outside of Europe. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2633–47.
Saqib A, Iftikhar S, Sarwar MR. Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: A cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6).
Huntington SF, Weiss BM, Vogl DT, Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Mangan PA, et al. Financial toxicity in insured patients with multiple myeloma: A cross-sectional pilot study. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(10):e408–16.
Pauwels K, Huys I, Vogler S, Casteels M, Simoens S. Managed entry agreements for oncology drugs: Lessons from the European experience to inform the future. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8(APR):1–8.
KCE. How to improve the Belgian process for managed entry agreements? An analysis of the Belgian and international experience. 2018;75 https://kce.fgov.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/KCE_288_Improve_Belgian_process_managed_entry_agreements_Report.pdf
Aggarwal A, Fojo T, Chamberlain C, Davis C, Sullivan R. Do patient access schemes for high-cost cancer drugs deliver value to society ?— lessons from the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund. Ann Oncol. 2017;(Aug);28(8):1738–1750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx110
Davies JE, Neidle S, Taylor DG. Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology : utilitarian regulation vs equitable care ? Br J Cancer [Internet]. 2012;106(1):14–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.544
England NHS. NHS England consultation : Proposals for a sustainable Cancer Drug Fund. 2014
Australian Department of Health. Life Saving Drugs Program Criteria and Conditions. [Internet]. https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/lsdp-criteria
Government of Canada. Special Access Programme - Drugs [Internet].https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/special-access/drugs/special-access-programme-drugs-1.html
AIFA. The independent research on drugs. 2019 [Internet] http://www.aifa.gov.it/en/content/independent-research-drugs
PHARMAC. Contestable fund for medicines for rare disordershttps://www.pharmac.govt.nz/news/consultation-2014-07-08-rare-disorders/
Scotland launches medicines fund for rare conditions [Internet]. https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/scotland-launches-medicines-fund-for-rare-conditions-updated/11115004.article
World Health Organization. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: 20th list, March 2017;(March):1–62. http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/
Hill J, Mills C, Li Q, Smith JS. Prevalence of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine use by cancer patients in low income and lower-middle income countries. Glob Public Health. 2019;14(3):418–30.
DIPP to issue CLs for Herceptin, Dasatini & Ixabepiloone – End of the line for Big Pharma’s patents in the Indian market? [Internet]. https://spicyip.com/2013/01/dipp-to-issue-cls-for-herceptin.html
Official Journal of the Patent Office. Issue 32/2011, 12/08/2011;13337–13363.Publication of the Patent Office. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzcGljeWlwZmlsZXN8Z3g6NDFlNjAxZDIyOTY0MjMyMg
Complete list of oppositions [Internet]. www.patentoppositions.org
170 Members of Congress Send Letter to Obama Criticizing India on Interllectual Property. https://www.keionline.org/22245
US Businesses Launch Coalition For Fair Trade With India [Internet]. https://www.ip-watch.org/2013/06/18/us-businesses-launch-coalition-for-fair-trade-with-india/
Braun JV. Use of Compulsory Licenses Selected National Experiences. http://unctad.org/Sections/dite_totip/docs/tot_ip_0018_en.pdf
Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP) [Internet]. https://accessaccelerated.org/initiative/glivec-international-patient-assistance-program-gipap/
A landmark for international collaboration on HTA and pharmaceutical pricing. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/landmark-international-collaboration-hta-pricing-neil-grubert
Italy proposes the WHO set international standards for drug-pricing transparency [Internet]. https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2019/02/14/italy-who-drug-prices-transparency/
United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. 2016. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2016-human-development-everyone
Introduction: Concepts of the Global South (GSSC) https://web.archive.org/web/20160904205139/http://gssc.uni-koeln.de/node/451
North And South, the (Global) [Internet]. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/north-and-south-global#D
World Health Organization, National cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines (2nd edition), Geneva. 2002.
Davis C, Naci H, Gurpinar E et al., Availability of Evidence of Benefits on Overall Survival and Quality of Life of Cancer Drugs Approved by European Medicines Agency: Retrospective Cohort Study of Drug Approvals 2009–2013. Eur Urol. 2018;73(4):635–6.
Vogler S, Paris V, Panteli D. Ensuring access to medicines: How to redesign pricing, reimbursement and procurement? Addressing Policy Failures In Pharmaceuticals Series Editor: Elias Mossialos. 2018; Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kwon, HY., Kim, Y. (2020). Global Access to Cancer Medicines. In: Babar, ZUD. (eds) Global Pharmaceutical Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2724-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2724-1_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2723-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2724-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)