Skip to main content

Application of PCA-TOPSIS Method for Selecting Optimal Welding Conditions in GMAW to Improve the Weld Quality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems

Abstract

Generally, the weld quality depends on the mechanical properties like ultimate strength and yield strength. Again the weld bead geometry mainly the depth of penetration affects these mechanical properties. These weld quality parameters weld bead geometry, weld bead strength are highly controlled or influenced by the welding process parameters like welding current, welding voltage, and wire feed rate, gas flow rate, and nozzle to workpiece distance in gas metal arc welding. As the process parameters affect the different welding performance parameters in different ways, single-objective optimization technique is not efficient enough to optimize all the parameters simultaneously. In this paper, a hybrid multi-objective approach, i.e., Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach has been used to obtain improved welding quality in optimal welding condition for gas metal arc welding (GMAW).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Srivastava S, Garg RK (2017) Process parameter optimization of gas metal arc welding on IS: 2062 mild steel using response surface methodology. J Manuf Process 25:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghosh N, Pal PK, Nandi G (2016) Parametric optimization of MIG welding on 316L austenitic stainless steel by grey-based taguchi method. Procedia Technol 25:1038–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh N, Rudrapati R, Pal PK, Nandi G (2017) Parametric optimization of gas metal Arc welding process by using Taguchi method on ferritic stainless steel AISI409. Mater Today Proc 4(2):2213–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin G, Meng X, Fu B (2015) High speed tandem gas tungsten arc welding process of thin stainless steel plate. J Mater Process Technol 220:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patil SR, Waghmare CA (2013) Optimization of MIG welding parameters for improving strength of welded joints. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 2(4):14–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sapakal SV, Telsang MT (2012) Parametric optimization of MIG welding using Taguchi design method. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1(4):28–30

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benyounis KY, Olabi AG (2008) Optimization of different welding processes using statistical and numerical approaches–a reference guide. Adv Eng Softw 39(6):483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Metzbower EA, DeLoach JJ, Lalam SH, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Neural network analysis of strength and ductility of welding alloys for high strength low alloy shipbuilding steels. Sci Technol Weld Joining 6(2):116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Olabi AG, Alsinani FO, Alabdulkarim AA, Ruggiero A, Tricarico L, Benyounis KY (2013) Optimizing the CO2 laser welding process for dissimilar materials. Opt Lasers Eng 51(7):832–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hooda A, Dhingra A, Sharma S (2012) Optimization of MIG welding process parameters to predict maximum yield strength in AISI 1040. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 1(3)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tong LI, Wang CH, Chen HC (2005) Optimization of multiple responses using principal component analysis and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chakravorty R, Gauri SK, Chakraborty S (2012) Optimization of correlated responses of EDM process. Mater Manuf Process 27:337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Athawale VM, Chakraborty S (2010) A TOPSIS method based approach to machine tool selection. In: Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lan TS (2009) Taguchi optimization of multi-objective CNC machining using TOPSIS. Inf Technol J 8(6):917–922

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rout, A., Mahanta, G.B., Deepak, B., Biswal, B.B. (2020). Application of PCA-TOPSIS Method for Selecting Optimal Welding Conditions in GMAW to Improve the Weld Quality. In: Deepak, B., Parhi, D., Jena, P. (eds) Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2696-1_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2696-1_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2695-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2696-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics