Skip to main content

Abstract

The goal of this work was to convey that asymmetry, far from being a prejudicial concept, is a prerequisite for our existence, as it is found even in the form of matter–antimatter asymmetry [1, 2] and as far back as the creation of time itself [3]. Across a wide variety of levels, asymmetry emerges as an efficient solution [4] and provides the foundation upon which structures develop. Asymmetry is present in the rotation of subatomic particles [5], topological superconductors [6], and geostatistical processes [7]. Naturally, these asymmetries are necessary for proper gene expression and regulation, as well as for embryological development [8, 9]. Developmental, structural, and functional asymmetries are a feature of all vertebrates and chordates [10]. Therefore, reality fundamentally depends on asymmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Canetti L, Drewes M, Shaposhnikov M (2012) Matter and antimatter in the universe. New J Phys 14:095012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perkins WA (2015) On the matter–antimatter asymmetry. Mod Phys Lett A 30:1550157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strazewski P (2010) The relationship between difference and ratio and a proposal: equivalence of temperature and time, and the first spontaneous symmetry breaking. J Syst Chem 1:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kibble TWB (2015) Spontaneous symmetry breaking in gauge theories. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 373:20140033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marciano WJ (2014) Quarks are not ambidextrous. Nature 506:43–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karnaukhov IN (2017) Spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry in topological superconductors. Sci Rep 7:7008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guthke P, Bárdossy A (2017) On the link between natural emergence and manifestation of a fundamental non-Gaussian geostatistical property: asymmetry. Spat Stat 20:1–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. McDowell G, Rajadurai S, Levin M (2016) From cytoskeletal dynamics to organ asymmetry: a nonlinear, regulative pathway underlies left–right patterning. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371:20150409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadler TW (2019) Langman’s medical embryology, 4th ed. Wolters Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stancher G, Sovrano VA, Vallortigara G (2018) Motor asymmetries in fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. Prog Brain Res 238:33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Auerbach BM, Ruff CB (2006) Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans. J Hum Evol 50:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson NW, Mockford BJ, Cran GW (2001) Absence of the palmaris longus muscle: a population study. Ulster Med J 70:22–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zamanlu M, Khamnei S, SalariLak S, Oskoee SS, Shakouri SK, Houshyar Y, Salekzamani Y (2012) Chewing side preference in first and all mastication cycles for hard and soft morsels. Int J Clin Exp Med 5:326–331

    Google Scholar 

  14. Colombo N, Vignaga F, Solari E, Merlo M, Manelli A, Negrini D, Moriondo A (2019) Gait screening of a population of young, healthy athletes by means of a portable, low-cost device unveils hidden left–right asymmetries in both quadriceps and anterior cruciate ligament forces. BMC Res Notes 12:366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bravi R, Cohen EJ, Martinelli A, Gottard A, Minciacchi D (2017) When non-dominant is better than dominant: kinesiotape modulates asymmetries in timed performance during a synchronization-continuation task. Front Integr Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2017.00021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maloney SJ (2019) The relationship between asymmetry and athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res 33:2579–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Girard O, Brocherie F, Morin J-B, Millet GP (2017) Lower limb mechanical asymmetry during repeated treadmill sprints. Hum Mov Sci 52:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fohanno V, Nordez A, Smith R, Colloud F (2015) Asymmetry in elite rowers: effect of ergometer design and stroke rate. Sport Biomech 14:310–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bishop C, Turner A, Read P (2018) Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: a systematic review. J Sports Sci 36:1135–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gray J, Aginsky KD, Derman W, Vaughan CL, Hodges PW (2016) Symmetry, not asymmetry, of abdominal muscle morphology is associated with low back pain in cricket fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport 19:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Auerbach BM, Raxter MH (2008) Patterns of clavicular bilateral asymmetry in relation to the humerus: variation among humans. J Hum Evol 54:663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Corballis MC (2009) The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:867–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Summerfeldt LJ, Gilbert SJ, Reynolds M (2015) Incompleteness, aesthetic sensitivity, and the obsessive-compulsive need for symmetry. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 49:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Afonso .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Afonso, J. et al. (2020). Concluding Remarks. In: Asymmetry as a Foundational and Functional Requirement in Human Movement. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2549-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2549-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2548-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2549-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics