Skip to main content

Abstract

Many daily activities are typified by automated routines, most of which we are not even aware of. From brushing our teeth to holding and eating an apple, to opening doors, to driving, the number of hours spent daily performing highly asymmetric actions is considerable. Overall, human movement does not fit with the notion of perfect symmetry [1]. Writing is perhaps the best example of how asymmetries make our actions more efficient, as humans spend countless hours of their lives writing, especially during the school years. Writing consists of more than dexterity, as it also has implications for posture. For example, in a study conducted by Flatters et al. [2], the authors explored the relationship between body stability and manual dexterity in children (n = 278) aged 3–11 years. The results showed that postural control and manual control are interdependent and that the development of both postural control and manual control has a degree of task-specific codependency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ueberschär O, Fleckenstein D, Warschun F, Kränzler S, Walter N, Hoppe MW (2019) Measuring biomechanical loads and asymmetries in junior elite long-distance runners through triaxial inertial sensors. Sport Orthop Traumatol 35:296–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Flatters I, Mushtaq F, Hill LJB, Holt RJ, Wilkie RM, Mon-Williams M (2014) The relationship between a child’s postural stability and manual dexterity. Exp Brain Res 232:2907–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verplancke K, De Waele W, De Bruyn H (2011) Dental implants, what should be known before starting an in vitro study. Sustain Constr Des 2:360–369

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zamanlu M, Khamnei S, SalariLak S, Oskoee SS, Shakouri SK, Houshyar Y, Salekzamani Y (2012) Chewing side preference in first and all mastication cycles for hard and soft morsels. Int J Clin Exp Med 5:326–331

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rovira-Lastra B, Flores-Orozco EI, Ayuso-Montero R, Peraire M, Martinez-Gomis J (2016) Peripheral, functional and postural asymmetries related to the preferred chewing side in adults with natural dentition. J Oral Rehabil 43:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parés-Casanova PM, Morros C (2014) Molar asymmetry shows a chewing-side preference in horses. J Zool Biosci Res 1:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stancher G, Sovrano VA, Vallortigara G (2018) Motor asymmetries in fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. Prog Brain Res 238:33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimoto K, Fushima K, Tamaki K, Toyoda M, Sato S, Uchimura N (2000) Asymmetry of masticatory muscle activity during the closing phase of mastication. CRANIO® 18:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang H-Y, Choi J-S, Kim H-E (2018) Masticatory efficiency contributing to the improved dynamic postural balance: a cross-sectional study. Gerodontology 35:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iizumi T, Magara J, Tsujimura T, Inoue M (2017) Effect of body posture on chewing behaviours in healthy volunteers. J Oral Rehabil 44:835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirano Y, Obata T, Takahashi H, Tachibana A, Kuroiwa D, Takahashi T, Ikehira H, Onozuka M (2013) Effects of chewing on cognitive processing speed. Brain Cogn 81:376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombo N, Vignaga F, Solari E, Merlo M, Manelli A, Negrini D, Moriondo A (2019) Gait screening of a population of young, healthy athletes by means of a portable, low-cost device unveils hidden left–right asymmetries in both quadriceps and anterior cruciate ligament forces. BMC Res Notes 12:366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramakrishnan T, Lahiff C-A, Reed KB (2018) Comparing gait with multiple physical asymmetries using consolidated metrics. Front Neurorobot. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orantes-Gonzalez E, Heredia-Jimenez J (2019) Gait asymmetry and rating of perceived exertion: how are they influenced by carrying a backpack and pulling a trolley? Work 63:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corballis MC (2009) The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:867–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spiezio C, Regaiolli B, Vallortigara G (2016) Motor and postural asymmetries in marsupials: forelimb preferences in the red-necked wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus). Behav Processes 128:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morcillo A, Fernandez-Carriba S, Loeches A (2006) Asymmetries in postural control and locomotion in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Primatol 68:802–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrada E, Rode C, Sutedja Y, Nyakatura JA, Blickhan R (2014) Trunk orientation causes asymmetries in leg function in small bird terrestrial locomotion. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20141405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfau T, Parkes RS, Burden ER, Bell N, Fairhurst H, Witte TH (2016) Movement asymmetry in working polo horses. Equine Vet J 48:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bishop C, Turner A, Read P (2018) Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: a systematic review. J Sports Sci 36:1135–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maloney SJ (2019) The relationship between asymmetry and athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res 33:2579–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Afonso .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Afonso, J. et al. (2020). Asymmetries in Daily Activities. In: Asymmetry as a Foundational and Functional Requirement in Human Movement. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2549-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2549-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2548-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2549-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics