Abstract
In the recent times, the concept of smart cities has gained momentum and has received considerable attention of urban planner, administrators, policymakers, etc., as a response to the complex problems associated with the unprecedented urbanization. However, citizen engagement or public participation is the key element in the smart-city concept to optimally reach the objectives. The intention of smart cities can only be met by making the communities smart and enabling the end-users and local people to involve in city governance. This article investigates the role of public participation in decision-making, transforming the same into a smart city in the real sense. The article also highlights the adaptable tools and techniques for effective public participation and limitations of this approach in the existing planning machinery in India. The paper facilitates a review of literature from varied research fields is accomplished to understand the role of community participation in smart-city context and to identify the different tools and techniques, empowering people to participate in city governance to make it smart.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AGENDA 21 (1992) United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janerio, Brazil
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35(4):216–224
Claude J, Zamor G (2012) Public participation in urban development: the case of Leipzig, Germany. J Public Adm Policy Res 4(4):75–83
Davidoff P (1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning. J Am Inst Plan 31(4):331–338
Friesecke F (2011) Public participation in urban development projects—a German perspective, FIG working week 2011—bridging the gap between cultures Marrakech, Morocco, pp 18–22
George S, Balan PP (2011) People’s participation in development planning in Kerela. In: Paper for India urban conference, Mysore, 17–20 Nov
Government of India. Ministry of Urban Development. JNNURM modified guidelines (submission for UIG). September 2006. Accessed 25 July 2012. http://www.india.gov.in/allimpfrms/alldocs/15518.pdf
International Peace building advisory Team (2015) Public participation and citizen engagement. Inter-peace, Geneva
Kinght F (2012) The wealth report 2012: a global perspective on prime property and wealth. Pure print group limited
Kingston R (2002) The role of e-government and public participation in the planning process. XVI Aesop Congress Volos, Greece
Krishnaswamy A (2012) Strategies and tools for effective public participation. FORREX Forum for Research and Extension in Natural Resources, Burnaby, Canada, pp 245–250
Lane MB (2005) Public participation in planning: an intellectual history. Aust Geogr 36(3):283–299
Lowndes V, Pratchett L, Stoker G (2002) Trends in public participation: part 2—citizens’ perspectives. Public Adm 79(2):445–452
MacLaran A, Clayton V, Brudell P (2007) Empowering communities in disadvantaged urban areas: towards greater community participation in Irish urban planning? Combat Poverty Agency Working Paper Series 07/04. ISBN: 978-1-905-48550-5
Master Plan for Delhi with the perspective for the year 2021
Nabatchi T (2012) Putting the “public” back in public values research: designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public administration review
Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Raisi J, Miri GR, Rezazade MH (2015) Evaluation and analysis of the role of citizen participation in urban development (case study: the city of Nikshahar). Am J Eng Res (AJER). E-ISSN: 2320–0847 p-ISSN: 2320-0936. 4(4):74-78
Roberts NC (2004) public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration 34(4):315–353
Rousseau JJ (1762) The social contract. translated by G. D. H. Cole, public domain
Satterthwaite D (1986) Urbanization and planning in the third world; spatial perceptions and public participation. Cities 3(2):170–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(86)90060-0
Sethi M (2015). Smart cities in India: challenges and possibilities to attain sustainable urbanisation #. Nagarlok 47:20. Indian Institute of Public Administration 0027-7584
United Nations General Assembly Draft outcome document of the United Nations summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda. UN. Retrieved 25 Sep 2015
Wang J, Beni G (1988) Pattern generation in cellular robotic systems. In: Presented at the 3rd IEEE symposium on intelligent control. Arlington, Virginia, August 24–26
Warner C (2015) Participatory mapping: a literature review of community-based research and participatory planning. Social hub for community and housing faculty of architecture and town planning technion. Spring
Wilson K, Hannington S, Stephen M (2015a) Is human resources available to carry out physical planning in Uganda? Int Interdiscip J Sci Res. ISSN: 2200-9833, 2(2):18-32
Wilson K, Hannington S, Stephen M (2015b) The role of community participation in planning processes of emerging urban centres. A study of Paidha town in Northern Uganda. Int Ref J Eng Sci (IRJES), 4(6):61–71
Zakaria BI, Ariga T (2010) Community participation and urban development: evaluation of community participation practice in the sudanese capital region. In: 46th ISOCARP Congress 2010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kapoor, A., Singh, E. (2020). Empowering Smart Cities Though Community Participation a Literature Review. In: Ahmed, S., Abbas, S., Zia, H. (eds) Smart Cities—Opportunities and Challenges. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 58. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2545-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2545-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2544-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2545-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)