Skip to main content

The Contemporary Relevance of Religion in the Public Square

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing upon personal experiences as a Catholic priest and a human rights lawyer who has worked mainly in Australia; as chair of the National Human Rights Consultation for the Rudd Government in 2009; as a participant in the public debate in the lead up to the 2017 Australian plebiscite on same sex marriage; and, as a member of the Australian government’s expert panel set up to report on freedom of religion in the wake of changes to the marriage laws, the author of this chapter offers a series of reflections on the contemporary relevance of religion in the public square.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    David Speers interviewed Archbishop Mark Coleridge on Skynews on 28 September 2017. When asked how Catholics could vote, Coleridge answered at some length: ‘Catholics we’re a big mob. Anyone who thinks we’re monolithic does not know the Catholic Church. It’s like herding cats. Catholics are going to vote “yes”, some are going to vote “no”, some are not going to vote at all. Some are going to vote “yes” for one reason, some for another; ditto with “no”. To think of a Catholic vote all going one way is just naïve. Of course it’s possible to vote “yes”. It depends why you vote “yes”. It’s possible to vote “no” but equally it depends why you vote “no”. And we’ve seen some awful stuff on both sides of the debate, or all sides of the debate, because there aren’t just two sides As a Catholic you can vote “yes” or you can vote “no”. I personally will vote “no” but for quite particular reasons. But I’m not going to stand here and say you vote “no”; and you vote “yes” and you’re a Catholic, you’ll go to hell. It’s not like that.’

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Brennan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brennan, F. (2020). The Contemporary Relevance of Religion in the Public Square. In: Babie, P., Sarre, R. (eds) Religion Matters. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2489-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics