Skip to main content

Inclusive Development and Economic Reforms: A Contemporary Critique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

In the context of the broader theme envisaged for this paper, it is necessary to note at the outset that the economic reform measures being undertaken in India now for nearly 30 years can be traced to the doctrine of Washington Consensus formulated by Williamson (Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Institute for International Economics, Washington, 1990) which contained ten key reforms including fiscal discipline comprising reordering of public expenditure priorities, tax reforms and privatisation, deregulation, liberal inward foreign investment, a competitive exchange rate and others, generally trying to promote a market economy and free trade.

A paper based on a Special Lecture delivered on October 10, 2018 at the International Seminar on “Inclusive Development: Issues and Challenges” organised by the Centre for Economic and Social Sciences (CESS), Hyderabad, in honour of Prof. R. Radhakrishna.

I wish to profusely thank the following colleagues of EPWRF for providing unstinted cooperation in the preparation of this lecture; J Dennis Rajakumar, Vishakha M Karmarkar, VijayataSawant, Harshada K. Parab, PravinJadhav, V P Prashant and K. Srinivasan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    They covered Japan; the ‘Four Tigers’, Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Taiwan, China; and the three newly industrialised economies (NIEs) of South East Asia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Mainland China was excluded the Report justifies it thus: recently China, particularly southern China, has recorded remarkably high growth rates using policies that in some ways resemble the HPAEs. This very significant development is beyond the scope of our study, mainly because China's ownership structure, methods of corporate and civil governance and reliance on markets are so different from the HPAEs, and in such rapid flux, that cross-economy comparison is problematic. We touch on China's recent development in Chap. 3 of “The East Asian Miracle”.

References

  • Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) (2016, 2017 and 2018) (ASER Facilitated by PRATHAM) (PRATHAM is an innovative learning organisation–an NGO–to improve the quality of education in India).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, R., Tulin, V., & Kumar, N. (2014). India: Defining and explaining inclusive growth and poverty reduction. (IMF Working Paper WP/14/63). International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Piketty, T. (2003). Top Indian incomes, 1956-2000. (BREAD Working Paper No. 046). September (BREAD = Bureau for Research in Economic Analysis of Development, MIT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2008). The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty (Policy Research Working Paper 4703). Development Research Group, The World Bank, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guruswamy, M., & Abraham, R.J. (2006). Redefining poverty: A new poverty line for a new India. Economic and Political Weekly (EPW), No. 25, June 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. (2003). From the Washington consensus to the post-Washington consensus: Retrospect and prospect. Asian Development Review, 20(2). (Philippines).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Accounts Estimates for India (2015–2016). (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare), Government of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: President and Fellow of the Harvard College, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission. (2008). Eleventh five year plan 2007-2012, inclusive growth (Vol. I). Government of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission. (2011). Mid term appraisal for eleventh five year plan 2007-2012, Government of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty, S. L. (2008). Growing inequality. In A Serious Challenge to the Indian Society and Polity (Dr. V K R V Memorial Lecture–6 delivered on November 27, 2008 at the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2007). Are Indian CEOs overpaid? Business Today, CII’s Conference, May 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. (2017). The instrumental harms of inequality. Mint, 6 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalisation, technology and Asian development. Asian Development Review, 20(2). (Philippines).

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy: Summary. The World Bank Policy Research Report, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2016). East Asian development: Lessons for a new global environment. Project Sponsored by the Government of Japan (Study Nos. 1 to 10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.) Latin American adjustment: How much has happened?. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (2003a). The Washington consensus and beyond. Economic and Political Weekly, XXXVIII(15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (2003b). From reform agenda to damaged brand name. Finance & Development. The International Monetary Fund, September, https://people.ucsc.edu/~hutch/Econ143/historywash.pdf.

  • World Economic Forum. (2017). The inclusive growth and development report 2017: Insight report. Geneva: Committed to Improving the State of the World.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The inclusive development index 2018–Summary and data highlights. Geneva: Committed to Improving the State of the World.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Shetty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shetty, S.L. (2020). Inclusive Development and Economic Reforms: A Contemporary Critique. In: Saleth, R., Galab, S., Revathi, E. (eds) Issues and Challenges of Inclusive Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2229-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics