Abstract
Emergence of nanotechnology field in biomedicine advised researchers to investigate the toxicity of nanosized particles. The interactions between metals and microorganisms are always a subject of interest in the last few decades owing to their possible transfer of stored metals to higher organisms. The toxicological impacts of nanoparticles on microbial metabolism and growth have always been the subject of interest for researchers. Several nanomaterials such as metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon materials were screened for their potential applications in the biomedical field. Even though nanoparticles have widespread applications in the field of biology and medicine, there is a serious impact of nanomaterials on human health and environment. There are nanoparticles with huge toxicity as they can pass through biological membranes affecting the physiology of the cell. Potential hazards of nanoparticles are much more wide and diverse on plants, vertebrates, and invertebrates than microorganisms. Yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a prominent and highly informative biological model among all in vitro models to evaluate the toxicity of different nanoparticles. It is also important to evaluate the toxicity of nanoparticles using model organism such as S. cerevisiae for the possible applications in different fields. Toxicological effects of nanoparticles vary depending on the size, chemical nature, and surface chemistry of particles. S. cerevisiae and its gene deletion mutant collections are successfully employed as a model to evaluate nanoparticle toxicity owing to their ability to reveal cellular toxicity and detoxification mechanism of nanoparticles. This will further add valuable information for testing the potential of emerging scope of nanoparticle world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbas KA, Saleh AM, Mohamed A, MohdAzhan N (2009) The recent advances in the nanotechnology and its applications in food processing: a review. J Food Agric Environ 7:14–17
Andreescu S, Gheorghiu M, Özel RE, Wallace KN (2011) Methodologies for toxicity monitoring and nanotechnology risk assessment. ACS Symp Ser 1079:141–180. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2011-1079.ch007
Babele PK, Thakre PK, Kumawat R, Tomar RS (2018) Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce toxicity by affecting cell wall integrity pathway, mitochondrial function and lipid homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chemosphere 213:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.028
Bahadar H, Maqbool F, Niaz K, Abdollahi M (2016) Toxicity of nanoparticles and an overview of current experimental models. Iran Biomed J 20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.7508/ibj.2016.01.001
Balbus JM, Maynard AD, Colvin VL et al (2007) Meeting report: hazard assessment for nanoparticles—report from an interdisciplinary workshop. Environ Health Perspect 115:1654–1659. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10327
Bao S, Lu Q, Fang T et al (2015) Assessment of the toxicity of CuO nanoparticles by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with multiple genes deleted. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:8098–8107. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02035-15
Barnes CA, Elsaesser A, Arkusz J et al (2008) Reproducible comet assay of amorphous silica nanoparticles detects no genotoxicity. Nano Lett 8:3069–3074. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl801661w
Baun A, Sørensen SN, Rasmussen RF et al (2008) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of xenobiotic organic compounds in the presence of aqueous suspensions of aggregates of nano-C60. Aquat Toxicol 86:379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.11.019
Carmona-Gutierrez D, Eisenberg T, Büttner S et al (2010) Apoptosis in yeast: triggers, pathways, subroutines. Cell Death Differ 17:763–773. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2009.219
Chen J, Hessler JA, Putchakayala K et al (2009) Cationic nanoparticles induce nanoscale disruption in living cell plasma membranes. J Phys Chem B 113:11179–11185. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9033936
Crane M, Handy RD, Garrod J, Owen R (2008) Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:421–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0215-z
Ferreira AJ, Cemlyn-Jones J, Robalo Cordeiro C (2013) Nanoparticles, nanotechnology and pulmonary nanotoxicology. Rev Port Pneumol 19:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2012.09.003
Galván Márquez I, Ghiyasvand M, Massarsky A et al (2018) Zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles toxicity in the baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 13:e0193111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193111
García-Saucedo C, Field JA, Otero-Gonzalez L, Sierra-Álvarez R (2011) Low toxicity of HfO2, SiO2, Al2O3 and CeO2 nanoparticles to the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Hazard Mater 192:1572–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.081
Grosjean N, Gross EM, Le Jean M, Blaudez D (2018) Global deletome profile of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to the technology-critical element yttrium. Front Microbiol 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02005
Gunawan C, Teoh WY, Marquis CP, Amal R (2011) Cytotoxic origin of copper(II) oxide nanoparticles: comparative studies with Micron-sized particles, leachate, and metal salts. ACS Nano 5:7214–7225. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2020248
Han X, Lei J, Chen K et al (2019) Cytotoxicity of CdTe quantum dots with different surface coatings against yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 174:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.013
Horstmann C, Campbell C, Kim DS, Kim K (2019) Transcriptome profile with 20 nm silver nanoparticles in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 19:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz003
Hutchison JE (2008) Greener nanoscience: a proactive approach to advancing applications and reducing implications of nanotechnology. ACS Nano 2:395–402. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800131j
Ivask A, Kurvet I, Kasemets K et al (2014) Size-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles to bacteria, yeast, algae, crustaceans and mammalian cells in vitro. PLoS One 9:e102108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102108
Jain KK (2009) The role of nanobiotechnology in drug discovery. Adv Exp Med Biol. 655:37–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1132-2_4
Kalantari H (2013) Nanotoxicology. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 8:1–2. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.9982
Käosaar S, Kahru A, Mantecca P, Kasemets K (2016) Profiling of the toxicity mechanisms of coated and uncoated silver nanoparticles to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 using a set of its 9 single-gene deletion mutants defective in oxidative stress response, cell wall or membrane integrity and endocyt. Toxicol In Vitro 35:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.05.018
Karaca F, Öner MA (2015) Scenarios of nanotechnology development and usage in Turkey. Technol Forecast Soc Change 91:327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.004
Kasemets K, Ivask A, Dubourguier H-C, Kahru A (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticles of ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicol In Vitro 23:1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.015
Kasemets K, Suppi S, Künnis-Beres K, Kahru A (2013) Toxicity of CuO nanoparticles to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and its nine isogenic single-gene deletion mutants. Chem Res Toxicol 26:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx300467d
Khebbeb MN, Djebar MR, Saib A, Berrebah H (2015) Evaluation of oxidative stress induced by nanoparticles (ZnO) on a unicellular biological model (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Der Pharma Chem 7:573–578
Kim D-Y, Kadam A, Shinde S et al (2018) Recent developments in nanotechnology transforming the agricultural sector: a transition replete with opportunities. J Sci Food Agric 98:849–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8749
Kumar Babele P (2019) Zinc oxide nanoparticles impose metabolic toxicity by de-regulating proteome and metabolome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicol Rep 6:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.12.001
Kumar V, Sharma N, Maitra SS (2017) In vitro and in vivo toxicity assessment of nanoparticles. Int Nano Lett 7:243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-017-0221-3
Lankveld DPK, Oomen AG, Krystek P et al (2010) The kinetics of the tissue distribution of silver nanoparticles of different sizes. Biomaterials 31:8350–8361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.045
Leso V, Fontana L, Iavicoli I (2019) Biomedical nanotechnology: occupational views. Nano Today 24:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.11.002
Li SQ, Zhu RR, Zhu H et al (2008) Nanotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to erythrocyte in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol 46:3626–3631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.012
Libralato G, Galdiero E, Falanga A et al (2017) Toxicity effects of functionalized quantum dots, gold and polystyrene nanoparticles on target aquatic biological models: a review. Molecules 22
Luyts K, Napierska D, Nemery B, Hoet PHM (2013) How physico-chemical characteristics of nanoparticles cause their toxicity: complex and unresolved interrelations. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EM30237C
Ly JD, Grubb DR, Lawen A (2003) The mitochondrial membrane potential (deltapsi(m)) in apoptosis; an update. Apoptosis 8:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A1022945107762
MENG H, CHEN Z, XING G et al (2007) Ultrahigh reactivity provokes nanotoxicity: explanation of oral toxicity of nano-copper particles. Toxicol Lett 175:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.09.015
Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL et al (2009) Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano- and micrometer-sized copper and copper(II) oxide particles: a cross-disciplinary study. Small 5:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801220
Mihindukulasuriya SDF, Lim L-T (2014) Nanotechnology development in food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 40:149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.009
Mishra M, Dashora K, Srivastava A et al (2019) Prospects, challenges and need for regulation of nanotechnology with special reference to India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 171:677–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.085
Miyazaki J, Kuriyama Y, Miyamoto A et al (2014) Adhesion and internalization of functionalized polystyrene latex nanoparticles toward the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Powder Technol 25:1394–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2014.06.014
Moriyama A, Takahashi U, Mizuno Y et al (2019) The truth of toxicity caused by yttrium oxide nanoparticles to yeast cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:5418–5425. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.16544
Nasrollahzadeh M, Sajadi SM (2019) Risks of nanotechnology to human life. In: Interface science and technology, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd., pp 323–336
Nasrollahzadeh M, Sajadi SM, Sajjadi M, Issaabadi Z (2019) An introduction to nanotechnology. In: Interface science and technology, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd., pp 1–27
Navarro E, Piccapietra F, Wagner B et al (2008) Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environ Sci Technol 42:8959–8964. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801785m
Olawoyin R (2018) Nanotechnology: the future of fire safety. Saf Sci 110:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.016
Pasquali F, Agrimonti C, Pagano L et al (2017) Nucleo-mitochondrial interaction of yeast in response to cadmium sulfide quantum dot exposure. J Hazard Mater 324:744–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.053
Pisanic TR, Blackwell JD, Shubayev VI et al (2007) Nanotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticle internalization in growing neurons. Biomaterials 28:2572–2581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.043
Pokhrel S, Xia T, Kovochich M et al (2009) Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of binary and mixed binary metal oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. Chemie Ing Tech 81:1167–1167. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.200950629
Rajak A (2018) Nanotechnology and its application. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 09:295–296. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.1000502
Rivière G (2009) European and international standardisation progress in the field of engineered nanoparticles. Inhal Toxicol 21:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370902942590
Sayes CM, Reed KL, Warheit DB (2007) Assessing toxicity of fine and nanoparticles: comparing in vitro measurements to in vivo pulmonary toxicity profiles. Toxicol Sci 97:163–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm018
Sousa CA, Soares HMVM, Soares EV (2018) Nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles disturb physiology and induce cell death in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:2827–2838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8802-2
Tang M, Wang M, Xing T et al (2008) Mechanisms of unmodified CdSe quantum dot-induced elevation of cytoplasmic calcium levels in primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. Biomaterials 29:4383–4391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.001
Tekade RK, Maheshwari R, Soni N et al (2017) Nanotechnology for the development of nanomedicine. In: Nanotechnology-based approaches for targeting and delivery of drugs and genes. Elsevier, pp 3–61
Walters C, Pool E, Somerset V (2016) Nanotoxicology: a review. In: Toxicology - new aspects to this scientific conundrum. InTech, Rijeka, p 13. https://doi.org/10.5772/62600
Wang Y, Qian W, Tan Y, Ding S (2008) A label-free biosensor based on gold nanoshell monolayers for monitoring biomolecular interactions in diluted whole blood. Biosens Bioelectron 23:1166–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2007.10.020
Warheit DB, Sayes CM, Reed KL (2009) Nanoscale and fine zinc oxide particles: can in vitro assays accurately forecast lung hazards following inhalation exposures? Environ Sci Technol 43:7939–7945. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901453p
Whitesides G (2005) Nanoscience, nanotechnology, and chemistry. Small 1:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200400130
Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M et al (2009) Polyethyleneimine coating enhances the cellular uptake of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and allows safe delivery of siRNA and DNA constructs. ACS Nano 3:3273–3286. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900918w
Xiu Z, Liu Y, Mathieu J et al (2014) Elucidating the genetic basis for Escherichia coli defense against silver toxicity using mutant arrays. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:993–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2514
Yarlagadda T, Sharma S, Yarlagadda PKDV, Sharma J (2019) Recent developments in the Field of nanotechnology for development of medical implants. Procedia Manuf 30:544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.077
Yi X, Zhao W, Li J et al (2017) Mn3O4 nanoparticles cause endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent toxicity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RSC Adv 7:46028–46035. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA07458A
Zhang W, Bao S, Fang T (2016) The neglected nano-specific toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep 6:24839. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24839
Zhu S, Luo F, Zhu B, Wang G-X (2017a) Toxicological effects of graphene oxide on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicol Res (Camb) 6:535–543. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TX00103G
Zhu S, Luo F, Zhu B, Wang G-X (2017b) Mitochondrial impairment and oxidative stress mediated apoptosis induced by α-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicol Res (Camb) 6:719–728. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TX00123A
Zhu S, Luo F, Li J et al (2018) Biocompatibility assessment of single-walled carbon nanotubes using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism. J Nanobiotechnol 16:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0370-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anju, V.T., Siddhardha, B., Dyavaiah, M. (2020). Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Model Organism to Evaluate Nanoparticle Toxicity. In: Siddhardha, B., Dyavaiah, M., Kasinathan, K. (eds) Model Organisms to Study Biological Activities and Toxicity of Nanoparticles. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1702-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1702-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1701-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1702-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)