Skip to main content

Who Should You Impress (and Where Are They Hiding)?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The value of a reach point across media is not what it used to be. Traditional statements about ‘buying big media’ may no longer be relevant. This chapter describes who you should impress from a theoretical perspective. Bigger media give advertisers potential access to greater numbers of viewers who, due to the Law of Double Jeopardy, also happen to view slightly more often than consumers of smaller media brands. This has been an underlying principle of finding unique reach. But the practical reality of how to find big audiences is changing. When an online platform is twice as big, but a reach point delivers half the pixels to half the humans, half of which are duplicate accounts, any value in being big is cancelled out. Advertisers will need to demand full transparency from media owners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Agostini, J. M. (1961). How to Estimate Unduplicated Audiences. Journal of Advertising Research, 1(3), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agostini, J. M. (1962). Analysis of Magazine Accumulative Audiences. Journal of Advertising Research, 2(1), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, P., & Ehrenberg, A. (1988). Television and Its Audience. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, V. (2003). Patterns in Television Viewing Behaviour: What’s Changed Since the 1980’s? (p. 154). Marketing Science Centre, University of South Australia, Master of Business (Research), Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, L., & Field, P. (2017). Media in Focus: Marketing Effectiveness in the Digital Era. Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byfield, S. (2002, June). Media Under Threat? Who Will Survive. European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, H. M., & Riordan, E. A. (1994). Effective Reach and Frequency: Does It Really Make Sense? Journal of Advertising Research, 34(2), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corkindale, D. R., Romaniuk, J., & Driesener, C. (2013). How the Duplication of Viewing Law Applies to Website Visiting and Some Implications (Doctoral dissertation). ANZMAC-Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1981). Who Watches Repeats? Broadcast, 1139(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C., Uncles, M. D., & Goodhardt, G. G. (2004). Understanding Brand Performance Measures: Using Dirichlet Benchmarks. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1307–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ephron, E. (1995). More Weeks, Less Weight: The Shelf-Space Model of Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(3), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephron, E. (1998). Point of View: Optimizers and Media Planning. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephron, E., & Heath, M. (2001). Once May Not Be Enough, But It’s the Best We Can Do. Admap, 36(10), 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fou, A. (2019, July 16). The #turnoffadtech Movement Is Gaining Momentum [LinkedIn post]. LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/turnoffadtech-movement-gaining-momentum-ad-fraud-historian/?trk=related_artice_The%20%23TurnOffAdtech%20Movement%20is%20Gaining%20Momentum_article-card_title.

  • Goodhardt, G. J. (1966, December 31). Constant in Duplicated Television Viewing. Nature, 212, 1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhardt, G. J., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1969). Duplication of Television Viewing Between and Within Channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Collins, M. A. (1987). The Television Audience—Patterns of Viewing: An Update. Hants, UK: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, P. (2017, February 22). The ABC of XYZ [LinkedIn post]. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/age-just-another-number-peter-hammer.

  • Kotila, M., Rumin, R. C., & Dhar, S. (2016). Compendium of Ad Fraud Knowledge for Media Investors. WFA Global Transparency Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, G. (2005). Is There a Double Jeopardy Effect with Radio Listening Behaviour (ANZMAC Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. (1992). How Advertising Works: A Review of Current Thinking. Henley-on-Thames, UK: Advertising Association in conjunction with NTC Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. (2000). Television Audience Measurement. WARC Best Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, W. S., & Dick, S. J. (2005). Revealing a Double Jeopardy Effect in Radio Station Audience Behaviour. Journal of Media Economics, 18(4), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Field, K., & Riebe, E. (2011). The Impact of Media Fragmentation on Audience Targeting: An Empirical Generalisation Approach. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, N., Tucker, C., & Whitfield, T. (2019, October 2). Frontiers: How Effective Is Third-Party Consumer Profiling and Audience Delivery? Evidence from Field Studies. Marketing Science, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1188.

  • Nicas, J. (2019). Does Facebook Really Know How Many Fake Accounts It Has? New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/30/technology/facebook-fake-accounts.html.

  • Pixalate. (2018, November 19). OTT Ad Fraud Is a Growing Threat, and You Need to Know More About It. Pixalate. Retrieved from http://blog.pixalate.com/what-is-ott-connected-tv-ad-fraud.

  • Putman, C. G. J., & Nieuwenhuis, L. J. (2018, March). Business Model of a Botnet. In 26th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP) (pp. 441–445). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redden, P. (2017). What Matters in Media: An Investigation of Media Decision Makers’ Perceptions of Value (Masters thesis). University of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, N. (2005). Regularities in Media Consumption (Masters thesis). University of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B. (2019, January 18). Will It Take an AdTech Crash to End Digital Ad Fraud? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucerogers/2019/01/18/will-it-take-an-adtech-crash-to-end-digital-ad-fraud/#5925b55d1368.

  • Rubinson Partners, Inc. (2017). Revealing the Return on Recency. NCSolutions. Retrieved from https://www.ncsolutions.com/case-studies/revealing-return-recency/#more-2745.

  • Sharp, B. (2010). How Brands Grow. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2010). Is Once Really Enough? Measuring the Advertising Response Function (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., Kennedy, R., McDonald, C., Larguinat, L., El Ouarzazi, Y., & Haddad, N. (2013). Is the Multi-platform Whole More Powerful Than Its Separate Parts? Measuring the Sales Effects of Cross-Media Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 53(2), 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., Kennedy, R., & Sharp, B. (2009). Making Generalizations About Advertising’s Convex Sales Response Function: Is Once Really Enough? Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 198–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999). How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Nelson-Field .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nelson-Field, K. (2020). Who Should You Impress (and Where Are They Hiding)?. In: The Attention Economy and How Media Works. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1540-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics