Skip to main content

Design an Improved Linked Clustering Algorithm for Spatial Data Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1090))

  • 745 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, various clustering mechanism has been introduced to form data and cluster them into diverse domains. Some of the clustering algorithms clustered the data in proper way for grouping datasets accurately. However, some of the clustering methods roughly merge the categorized and numeric data types. Clustering is a process to identify the patterns distribution and intrinsic correlations in large datasets by separation of data points into similar classes. The proposed system, Improved Linked Clustering (ILC), is introduced to find a number of clusters on mixed datasets to produce results for several datasets. The ILC algorithm helps to prefer which clustering mechanism should be utilized to obtain a coherent and a mixed data significant mechanism for specific character deployment. Moreover, the technique can be used for optimization criteria during cluster formation for assisting clustering process toward better and efficient character interpretable technique. The technique objective is to offer a novel clustering method for data clustering methods evaluation over mixture of datasets including prior spatial information about the relation of elements which represents the clusters. The method provides an idea to estimate the character significance of clustering technique. The method estimates the summarization of the spatial point analysis of clustering technique with respect to coherence and clusters distribution. The proposed method is evaluated in two databases (character, spatial) using three conventional clustering techniques. Based on experimental evaluations, the proposed ILC algorithm improves the 0.04% cluster accuracy and 0.4 s cluster computation time compared to conventional techniques on the spatial dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asadi, S., C.D.S. Rao, C. Kishore, and S. Raju. 2012. Clustering the Mixed Numerical and Categorical Datasets Using Similarity Weight and Filter Method. International Journal of Computer Science Information Technology and Management 1 (1–2): 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shih, M.Y., J.W. Jheng, and L.F. Lai. 2010. A Two-Step Method for Clustering Mixed Categorical and Numeric Data. Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering 13 (1): 1119.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Z., K.T. McDonnell, E. Zadok, and K. Mueller. 2015. Visual Correlation Analysis of Numerical and Categorical Data on the Correlation Map. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21 (2): 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiecki, T.V., J. Poland, and M.J. Frank. 2015. Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Computational Psychiatry: Clustering and Classification. Clinical Psychological Science 3 (3): 378–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacques, J., and C. Preda. 2014. Model-Based Clustering for Multivariate Functional Data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 71: 92–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, J., J. Wu, and M. Sarwat. 2015. Geospark: A Cluster Computing Framework for Processing Large-Scale Spatial Data. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems 70. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, X., C. Zhang, H. Fu, S. Liu, and H. Zhang. 2015. Diversity-Induced Multi-view Subspace Clustering. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 586–594. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Von Landesberger, T., F. Brodkorb, P. Roskosch, N. Andrienko, G. Andrienko, and A. Kerren. 2016. Mobilitygraphs: Visual Analysis of Mass Mobility Dynamics via Spatio-Temporal Graphs and Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22 (1): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen, H.L., Y.K. Woon, and W.K. Ng. 2015. A Survey on Data Stream Clustering and Classification. Knowledge and Information Systems 45 (3): 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, C., Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, and X. Lin. 2016. Inverted Linear Quadtree: Efficient top k Spatial Keyword Search. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 28 (7): 1706–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fahad, A., N. Alshatri, Z. Tari, A. Alamri, I. Khalil, A.Y. Zomaya, S. Foufou, and A. Bouras. 2014. A Survey of Clustering Algorithms for Big Data: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 2 (3): 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron, A.C., and D.L. Miller. 2015. A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference. Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 317–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, J.Y., and H.H. He. 2016. A Fast Density-Based Data Stream Clustering Algorithm with Cluster Centers Self-Determined For Mixed Data. Information Sciences 345: 271–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramakrishna Murty, M., J.V.R. Murthy, and P.V.G.D. Prasad Reddy et al. 2014. Homogeneity Separateness: A New Validity Measure for Clustering Problems. In International Conference and Published the Proceedings in AISC, vol. 248 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., H. Liu, X. Qian, Y. Jiang, Z. Deng, and S. Wang. 2017. Cascaded Hidden Space Feature Mapping, Fuzzy Clustering, and Nonlinear Switching Regression on Large Datasets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 26: 640–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding, R., Q. Wang, Y. Dang, Q. Fu, H. Zhang, and D. Zhang. 2015. Yading: Fast Clustering of Large-Scale Time Series Data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 8 (5): 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrari, D.G., and L.N. De Castro. 2015. Clustering Algorithm Selection by Meta-Learning Systems: A New Distance-Based Problem Characterization and Ranking Combination Methods. Information Sciences 301: 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guha, S., and N. Mishra. 2016. Clustering Data Streams. In Data Stream Management 169–187. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, C.L., R.J. Kuo, C.H. Chien, and N.T.P. Quyen. 2015. Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Using Fuzzy Membership Chromosome for Categorical Data Clustering. Applied Soft Computing 30: 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Lakshmaiah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lakshmaiah, K., Murali Krishna, S., Eswara Reddy, B. (2020). Design an Improved Linked Clustering Algorithm for Spatial Data Mining. In: Raju, K., Govardhan, A., Rani, B., Sridevi, R., Murty, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics . Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1090. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1480-7_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics