Skip to main content

Fusing Classical Theories and Biomechanics into Forest Modelling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Methods and Applications in Forestry and Environmental Sciences

Part of the book series: Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics ((FFIM))

  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

There is a renaissance in forest modelling due to the application of mathematics and physics. There are some classical theories including pipe model theory, Metzger’s theory, self-thinning rule, Da Vinci’s tree form concept, Logarithmic spiral technique, etc., which have greater significance in forestry science. With advanced computational tools from the IT revolution at disposal, a better understanding of the above-mentioned theories is now possible. In meantime, plants’ architecture and design have been a source of inspiration for biomechanists, as mechanics is an inseparable part of the abiotic realm. It is based on one important principle “all structures, whether engineered or natural, must obey the laws of physics”. Trees grow, adapt and acclimate to maintain their stability. This demands a trade-off between their mechanical stability and other physiological functions. It is also vivid that mechanical forces can manipulate the tree architecture and root architecture and influence thigomorphogensis. For this reason, it is important to understand the impact of mechanical forces on tree growth. Forest modelling can take a leap forward by infusing these theories and biomechanics. The present chapter narrates some of the classical theories in forestry and simultaneously showcases the relevance of these theories based on research work done. Furthermore, it deliberates on the utilization of modelling to provide greater impetus in forest science in order to explore prudent silvicultural practice for enhancing forest productivity and product quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, F. (2010). Use of vegetation for slope protection: Root mechanical properties of some tropical plants. International Journal of Physical Sciencies, 5(5), 496–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avani, N., Lateh, H., & Bibalani, G. H. (2015). Root distribution of Acacia mangium Willd. and Macaranga tanarius L. of rainforest. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 43, 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, L. P., Stegen, J. C., Savage, V. M., Smith, D. D., Allmen, E. I., Sperry, J. S., et al. (2013). An empirical assessment of tree branching networks and implications for plant allometric scaling models. Ecological Letters, 16, 1069–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bézivin, J. (2005). On the unification power of models. Software and Systematic Modelling, 4(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhimappa, K. (2014). Bamboo based agroforestry systems in Kerala, India: performance of turmeric (Curcumalonga L.) in the subcanopy of differentially spaced seven year-old bamboo stand. Agroforestry Systems, 90(2), 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, W. (1979). Methods of studying root systems (p. 188p). Berlim: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boudaoud, A. (2010). An introduction to the mechanics of morphogenesis for plant biologists. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronzino, J. D. & Peterson, D. R. (2014). Biomechanics: Principles and practices (pp. 352). CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divakara, B. N., Kumar, B. M., Balachandran and P. V, Kamalam, N. V. (2001). Bamboo hedgerow systems in Kerala, India: Root distribution and competition with trees for phosphorus. Agroforestry Systems, 51, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eloy, C. (2011). Leonardo’s rule, self-similarity, and wind-induced stresses in trees. Physical Review Letters, 107(25), 258101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eloy, C., Fournier, M., Lacointe, A., & Moulia, B. (2017). Wind loads and competition for light sculpt trees into self-similar structures. Nature Communications, 8, 1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos, A. (1997). Wind as an ecological factor. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist, B. J., & Niklas, K. J. (2002). Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 80(295), 1517–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, J. E., Moreno, F., Cabrera, F., Arrue, J. L., & Martín-Aranda, J. (1991). Drip irrigation, soil characteristics and the root distribution and root activity of olive trees. Plant and Soil, 133, 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcaud, T., & Lac, P. (2003). Numerical modelling of shape regulation and growth stresses in trees. Trees, 17, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcaud, T., Zhang, X., Stokes, A., Lambers, H., & Körner, C. (2008). Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Annals of Botany, 101, 1053–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, M., Stokes, A., Coutand, C., Fourcaud, T., & Moulia, B. (2006). Tree biomechanics and growth strategies in the context of forest functional ecology. Ecology and Biomechanics—a mechancial approach to ecology of animals and plants (pp. 1–33). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, K., Sahle, S., & Kummer, U. (2011). Applications and trends in systems biology in biochemistry. The FEBS Journal, 278, 2767–2857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huguet, J. G. (1973). Nouvelle methode d’etude de l’enracinement des vegetaux perennes a partir d’une trachee spirale. Annales Agronomiques, 24(6), 707–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. D., & O’Rourke, S. L. (2015). An introduction to biomechanics (p. 692). New York: Springer New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. J., Trebitz, A. S., & Cottingham, K. L. (2000). An introduction to the practice of ecological modeling. BioScience, 50(8), 694–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirasek, C., Prusinkiewicz, P., & Moulia, B. (2000). Integrating biomechanics into developmental plant models expressed using L-systems. Plant Biomechanics, 19, 615–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D., & Loucks, O. L. (1978). The theory of tree bole and branch form. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 15, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, A. M., Crook, N. C., & Alper, H. S. (2012). Innovation at the intersection of synthetic and systems biology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23, 712–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lateh, H., Avani, N., & Bibalani, G. H. (2012). Investigation of root distribution and tensile strength of Acaciamangium willd (Fabaceae) in the rainforest. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lateh, H., Avani, N., & Bibalani, H. (2013). Effect of Acaciamangium root properties on shallow landslide and slope stability. Journal of Life Science and Technology, 1, 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, E. H. (1967). A book of curves (p. 690). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattheck, C. (2006). Teacher tree: The evolution of notch shape optimization from complex to simple. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 73, 1732–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, T. A., & Kronauer, R. E. (1976). Tree structures: Deducing the principle of mechanical design. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 59, 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., & Cannell, M. G. R. (1994). Shape of tree stems—a re-examination of the uniform stress hypothesis. Tree Physiology, 14, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas, K. J., & Spatz, H. C. (2012). Plant physics (p. 426) University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppelt, A. L., Kurth, W., & Godbold, D. L. (2001). Topology, scaling relations and Leonardo’s rule in root systems from African tree species. Tree Physiology, 21, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellier, D., Fourcaud, T., & Lac, P. (2006). A finite element model for investigating effects of aerial architecture on tree oscillations. Tree Physiology, 26, 799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, P., Keith, H., & Raison, R. J. (2001). Protocol for sampling tree and stand biomass. Technical Report No. 31, Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sone, K., Suzuki, A. A., Miyazawa, S. I., Noguchi, K., & Terashima, I. (2009). Maintenance mechanisms of the pipe model relationship and Leonardo da Vinci’s rule in the branching architecture of Acer rufinerve trees. Journal of Plant Research, 122, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, K., Kunhamu, T. K., & Mohankumar, B. (2004). Root excavation studies in a mature rubber (Heveabrasiliensis Muell. Arg.) plantation. Natural Rubber Research, 17, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, S., Kumar, B. M., & Kunhamu, T. K. (2015). Coarse root biomass, carbon, and nutrient stock dynamics of different stem and crown classes of silver oak (Grevillearobusta A. Cunn. ex. R. Br.) plantation in central Kerala, India. Agroforestry Systems, 89, 869–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, H., Traore, A., & Teklehaimanot, Z. (1998). An investigation of the root distribution of Parkia biglobosa in Burkina Faso, West Africa, using a logarithmic spiral trench. Forest and Ecology Management, 107, 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, N. V., & Santos, G. (2015). The mathematical modeling process in biosciences. Frontiers in Genetics, 6, 354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voottipruex, P., Bergado, D. T., Mairaeng, W., Chucheepsakul, S., & Modmoltin, C. (2008). Soil reinforcement with combination roots system: a case study of Vetiver grass and Acacia Mangium Wild. Lowland Technology International, 10, 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, J., & Mulligan, M. (2005). Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity (p. 494). John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Suresh Ramanan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramanan, S.S., Kunhamu, T.K., Namgyal, D., Gupta, S.K. (2020). Fusing Classical Theories and Biomechanics into Forest Modelling. In: Chandra, G., Nautiyal, R., Chandra, H. (eds) Statistical Methods and Applications in Forestry and Environmental Sciences. Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1476-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics