Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cotton-Based Intercropping Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cotton Production and Uses

Abstract

Coping with the threat of climate change and food security, crop productivity needs improvement. Low-price situation for cotton in some developing countries is discouraging cotton cultivation. Cotton-based intercropping offers a better solution to cope with the situation. The system of companion plantation of one crop with another during the same growing season on the same piece of land offers an option. The basic objective is to augment yields by multiplying the available growing area. Across other merits of intercropping, the biodiversity of growing crops attracts a variety of predatory insects making possible an integrated pest control of cotton. Intercropping may be classified into three types, viz., mixed cropping, which includes planting a variety of harmonious plants together; alley or row cropping, in which diverse crops are grown with each other in rows; or temporal intercropping, that is a system of the fast-growing crop with a slow growth. Due to a relatively longer duration with slow-growing habit during initial stages, cotton-based cropping system is ideally suitable for intercropping. The cotton-based intercropping aims to maximize the yield of cotton along with extra profits from intercrops. There is a wide range of crops including cereals, legumes, and vegetables, which are possible to grow with or in standing cotton crop. Each group offers versatile advantages in terms of yields of both companion crops and monetary returns of the system. However, there is a crop-wise variation in monetary advantages of diverse intercropping systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbas Q, Ahmad S (2018) Effect of different sowing times and cultivars on cotton fiber quality under stable cotton-wheat cropping system in southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Life Soc Sci 16:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Myaka FA, Sakala WD, Odgaard R, Vesterager JM, Hogh-Jensen H (2007) Biological nitro- gen fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in farmer-managed intercrops of maize-pigeonpea in semiarid southern and eastern Africa. Plant Soil 295:127–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Abbas Q, Abbas G, Fatima Z, Atique-ur-Rehman NS, Younis H, Khan RJ, Nasim W, Habib urRehman M, Ahmad A, Rasul G, Khan MA, Hasanuzzaman M (2017) Quantification of climate warming and crop management impacts on cotton phenology. Plan Theory 6(7):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Iqbal M, Muhammad T, Mehmood A, Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M (2018) Cotton productivity enhanced through transplanting and early sowing. Acta Sci Biol Sci 40:e34610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Raza I (2014) Optimization of management practices to improve cotton fiber quality under irrigated arid environment. J Food Agric Environ 2(2):609–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Raza I, Ali H, Shahzad AN, Atiq-ur-Rehman SN (2014) Response of cotton crop to exogenous application of glycinebetaine under sufficient and scarce water conditions. Braz J Bot 37(4):407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Abid SA, Ahmad S, Sarwar N, Arooj M, Mahmood A, Shahzad AN (2013a) Integrated weed management in cotton cultivated in the alternate-furrow planting system. J Food Agric Environ 11(3&4):1664–1669

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Abid SA, Ahmad S, Sarwar N, Arooj M, Mahmood A, Shahzad AN (2013b) Impact of integrated weed management on flat-sown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Anim Plant Sci 23(4):1185–1192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Afzal MN, Ahmad F, Ahmad S, Akhtar M, Atif R (2011) Effect of sowing dates, plant spacing and nitrogen application on growth and productivity on cotton crop. Int J Sci Eng Res 2(9):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Hameed RA, Ahmad S, Shahzad AN, Sarwar N (2014a) Efficacy of different techniques of nitrogen application on American cotton under semi-arid conditions. J Food Agric Environ 12(1):157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Hussain GS, Hussain S, Shahzad AN, Ahmad S, Javeed HMR, Sarwar N (2014b) Early sowing reduces cotton leaf curl virus occurrence and improves cotton productivity. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova XLVII(4):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Ahmad A, Nadeem M, Urich P, Fahad S, Ahmad S, Wajid A, Tabassum F, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Anwar S, Baloch SK, Wahid A, Wilkerson CJ, Hoogenboom G (2018a) Simulated CSM-CROPGRO-cotton yield under projected future climate by SimCLIM for southern Punjab, Pakistan. Agric Syst 167:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Nadeem M, Ali L, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Jabran K, Habib urRehman M, Ahmad S, Awais M, Rasool A, Fahad S, Saud S, Shah AN, Ihsan Z, Ali S, Bajwa AA, Hakeem KR, Ameen A, Amanullah HUR, Alghabar F, Jatoi GH, Akram M, Khan A, Islam F, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Rehmani MIA, Hussain S, Razaq M, Fathi A (2017) Optimizing the phosphorus use in cotton by using CSM-CROPGRO-cotton model for semi-arid climate of Vehari-Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(6):5811–5823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amin MR, Islam MS, Hasan MK, Sabagh AE (2018b) Improvement of production and net economic return through intercropping of upland cotton with mungbean. Azarian J Agric 5:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Anil L, Park J, Phipps RH, Miller FA (1998) Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci 53:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anitha S, Geethakumari VL, Filial GR (2001) Effect of intercrops on nutrient uptake and productivity of chilli-based cropping system. J Trop Agric 39:60–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian TN (1987) Performance of arboretum and hirsutum cotton under intercropping blackgram and land management practices. Ph.D. Thesis, the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldy C, Stigter CJ (1997) Agrometeorology of multiple cropping in warm climates. INRA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ, Goudriaan J, van Laar HH (2000) Design of weed management systems with a reduced reliance on herbicides poses new challenges and prerequisites for modelling crop-weed interactions. Field Crops Res 67:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carandang DA (1980) Resource utilization in integrated farming system with crops as the major enterprise. In: Telangco MH (ed) Integrated crop-livestock-fish farming. Laguna, Philippines, pp 8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema ZA, Khaliq A (2000) Use of sorghum alleopathic properties to control weeds in irrigated wheat in a semiarid region of Punjab. Agric Ecosyst Environ 79:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MK, Rosario EL (1994) Comparison of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium utilization efficiency in maize/mung bean intercropping. J Agric Sci 122(2):193–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crew TE, Peoples MB (2004) Legume versus fertilizer source of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danso SKA, Zapata F, Hardarson G, Fried M (1987) Nitrogen fixation in faba beans as affected by plant population density in sole or intercropped systems with barley. Soil Biol Biochem 19:411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande RM, Kharche SG, Rawankar HN (1989) Studies on intercropping with legumes in relation to planting pattern of hybrid cotton. PKV Res J 13:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunin FX, Williams J, Verberg K, Keating BA (1999) Can agricultural catchment emulate natural ecosystems in recharge control in southeastern Australia? Agric Syst 45:343–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskandari H, Ghanbari A, Javanmard A (2009) Intercropping of cereals and legumes for forage production. Not Sci Biol 1:07–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eure PM, Culpepper AS, Merchant RM, Roberts PM, Collins GC (2015) Weed control, crop response, and profitability when intercropping cantaloupe and cotton. Weed Technol 29:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell JG, Altieri MA (1995) Agroforestry systems in agroecology. In: Altieri MA (ed) The science of sustainable agriculture. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 219–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis CA (1986) Future perspectives of multiple cropping. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple cropping systems. Macmillan, New York, pp 351–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K, Ofosu KG, Ogata S (1992) Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume-cereal cropping system. Plant Soil 144:155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukai S, Trenbath BR (1993) Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crops Res 34:247–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geno L, Geno B (2001) Polyculture Production: Principle, benefits and risk of multiple cropping. A report for the Rural Industry Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), Publication, No. 01134

    Google Scholar 

  • Girjesh GK, Patil VC (1991) Weed management studies in groundnut and sunflower intercropping system. J Oilseeds Res 8:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Rodriguez O, Zavaleta-Mejia E, Gonzalez-Hernandez AV, Livera-Munoz M, Cardenas-Soriano E (2007) Physiological and morphological adaptations in tomato intercropped with Tagetes erecta and Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Rev Fitotec Mex 30(4):421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal J, Cheema ZA, An M (2007) Intercropping of field crops in cotton for the management of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Plant Soil 300:163–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaya IKD, Bell CJ, Sale PW (2001) Modification of within- microclimate in maize for intercropping in the lowland tropics. Proceedings of the Australian Agronomy Conference. Australia Society of Agronomy, Australia, pp 123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar M, Surendran U (2017) Intercropping and balanced nutrient management for sustainable cotton production. J Plant Nutr 40:632–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaddar VK, Ray N (1985) Rice-based cropping systems. Int Rice Res Notes 10(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamel AS, Sahar AS, Ibrahim ST (2004) New agro-techniques in intensive crop rotations under marginal conditions of Upper Egypt. New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Katkar RN, Turkhede AB, Solanke VM, Wankhade ST, Patil MR (2002) Effect of integrated management of organic manures and fertilizers on soil properties and yield of cotton. J Cotton Res Dev 16:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating BA, Carberry PS (1993) Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation. Field Crops Res 34:273–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MB, Akhtar M, Khaliq A (2001) Effect of planting patterns and different intercropping systems on the productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under irrigated conditions of Faisalabad. Int J Agric Biol 3:432–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MB, Khaliq A (2004) Study of mungbean intercropping in cotton planted with different techniques. J Res (Sci) 15:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MB, Khaliq A, Ahmad S (2004) Performance of mashbean intercropped in cotton planted in different planting patterns. J Res (Sci) 15(2):191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MB, Khan M, Hussain M, Farooq M, Jabran K, Lee DJ (2012) Bio-economic assessment of different wheat-canola intercropping systems. Int J Agric Biol 14:769–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Kumar BU (2006) Use of organics for crops for crop production under rainfed situation-a review. Agric Rev 27:208–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanini WT, Orloff SB, Vargas RN, Orr JP (1992) Using oats as companion crop in establishing alfalfa. Calif Agric 46(4):25–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemma D (2002) Tomatoes: research experiences and production prospects. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Report (43):1–47. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M, Dyck E (1993) Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol Appl 3(1):92–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marimuthua S, Surendran U, Subbian P (2014) Productivity, nutrient uptake and post-harvest soil fertility as influenced by cotton-based cropping system with integrated nutrient management practices in semi-arid tropics. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midmore DJ (1993) Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crops Res 34:357–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad MK, El-din GMS, Hosny AA (1991) Evaluating three patterns of intercropping cotton and forage cowpeas. Ann Agric Sci Moshtohor 29:1269–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993) Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: non nitrogen nutrients. Field Crops Res 34:319–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpairwe DR, Sabiiti EN, Umunna NN, Tegegne A, Osuji PO (2002) Effect of intercropping cereal crops with forage legumes and source of nutrients on cereal grain yield and fodder dry matter yields. Afr Crop Sci J 10:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narwal SS (2004) Allelopathy in crop production. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndakidemi P (2006) Manipulating legume/cereal mixtures to optimize the above and below ground interactions in the traditional African cropping systems. Afr J Biotechnol 525:2526–2533

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehra DS, Bishnoi LK, Kairon MS (1990a) Effect of nitrogen and azotobacter on yield of seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Cotton Res Dev 4:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehra DS, Kairon MS, Bishnoi LK (1990b) Effect of rate and methods of nitrogen application on hirsutum cotton genotypes. J Cotton Res Dev 4:209–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Parajulee MN, Montandon R, Slosser JE (1997) Relay intercropping to enhance abundance of insect predators of cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii glover) in Texas cotton. Int J Pest Manag 43:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wang X, Wajid A, Nasim W, Hussain M, Ahmad B, Ahmad I, Ali Z, Ishaque W, Awais M, Shelia V, Ahmad S, Fahad S, Alam M, Ullah H, Hoogenboom G (2018) Multi-model projections of future climate and climate change impacts uncertainty assessment for cotton production in Pakistan. Agric For Meteorol 253-254:94–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajpoot SK, Rana DS, Choudhary AK (2018) Bt-cotton–vegetable-based intercropping systems as influenced by crop establishment method and planting geometry of Bt-cotton in indo-Gangetic plains region. Curr Sci 115:516–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna A, Ong CK (1994) Productivity and light interception in upland rice /legume intercropping systems. Trop Agric 71(1):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana KS, Pal M (1999) Effect of intercropping systems and weed control on crop weed competition and grain yield of pigeonpea. Crop Res 17:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao VP (1991) A study on intercropping of cotton with grain legumes under rainfed conditions. The J Res APAU 19(20):73–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy RRP (2005) Planting techniques for intercropping studies in cotton. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusinamhodzi L, Murwira HK, Nyamangara J (2006) Cotton–cowpea intercropping and its N2 fixation capacity improves yield of a subsequent maize crop under Zimbabwean rain-fed conditions. Plant Soil 287:327–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed M, Shahid MRM, Jabbar A, Ullah E, Bismillah M (1999) Agro-economic assessment of different cotton-based inter/relay cropping systems in two geometrical patterns. Int J Agric Biol 4(1):234–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanandachari A (1980) Inter cropping of rice fallow cotton with pulses. Cotton Dev 10(1&2):5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan K, Nalayini P, Praharaj CS (2012) Multi-tier cropping system to enhance resource utilization, profitability and sustainability of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production system. Indian J Agric Sci 82:1044–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan K, Nalayini P, Sabesh M, Rajendran K, Nachane RP, Gopalakrishnan N (2011) Multi-tier cropping system for profitability and stability in Bt. cotton production. Central Institute for Cotton Research, Technical Bulletin No. 2, pp. 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankaranarayanan K, Prahara CS, Nalayini P, Bandyopadhyay KK, Gopalakrishnan N (2010) Legume as companion crop for cotton. J Cotton Res Dev 24:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM (2009) Weed management under different patterns of sunflower-soybean intercropping. J Cent Eur Agric 10(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Schader C, Zaller JG, Kopke U (2005) Cotton-basil intercropping, effects on pests, yields and economical parameters in an organic field in Fayoum, Egypt. Biol Agric Hortic 23:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoofs A, Entz MH (2000) Influence of annual forages on weed dynamics in a cropping system. Can J Plant Sci 80:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah MA, Farooq M, Hussain M (2016) Productivity and profitability of cotton–wheat system as influenced by relay intercropping of insect resistant transgenic cotton in bed planted wheat. Eur J Agron 75:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugham K, Basu AK (1989) Intercropping in cotton increases production and profit. Indian Farming 41(3):21–22 & 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheshadri V, Natarajan K (1989) Effect of different intercrops on the growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and their economics. Indian J Agric Sci 59(4):227–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaydon RW, Harris PM (1981) Interactions below ground- the use of nutrients and water. In: Willey R (ed) Proceedings of the international workshop on intercropping. ICRISAT, Patanancheru, India, pp 188–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Surendran U, Rama Subramoniam S, Raja P, Kumar V, Murugappan V (2016) Budgeting of major nutrients and the mitigation options for nutrient mining in semi-arid tropical agro-ecosystem of Tamil Nadu, India using NUT-MON model. Environ Monit Assess 188(4):250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Afzal MN, Muhammad D, Ahmad S, Shahzad AN, Kiran A, Wakeel A (2018) Relationship of tissue potassium content with yield and fiber quality components of Bt cotton as influenced by potassium application methods. Field Crops Res 229:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Yasmeen A, Ahmad S, Hussain N, Afzal MN, Hasanuzzaman M (2017) Shedding of fruiting structures in cotton: factors, compensation and prevention. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 20(2):251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubo M, Mukhala E, Ogindo HO, Walker S (2003) Productivity of maize-bean intercropping in a semi- arid region of South Africa. Water SA 29(4):381–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Ahmad A, Ahmad S, Irshad M, Khaliq T, Wajid A, Hussain K, Nasim W, Chattha TM, Trethowan R, Hoogenboom G (2009) Development and application of crop water stress index for scheduling irrigation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under semiarid environment. J Food Agric Environ 7(3&4):386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Wankhade ST, Turkhede AB, Katkar RN, Solanke VM, Sakhare BA (2001) Effect of bio-mulching and fertilizer on growth and yield of cotton. Crop Res 21:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterworth JV (1994) Intercropping cotton and groundnut in low and high rainfall areas in eastern Zambia. Exp Agric 30:461–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey RW (1990) Resource use in intercropping systems. Agric Water Manag 17:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Cui J, Ma L, Dong S, Cui X (1998) The role of transgenic BT cotton in integrated insect pest management. Acta Gossypii Sinica 11:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakudu H, Kwari JD, Sandade MK (2010) Effect of phosphorus on nitrogen fixation by some grain legume varieties in Sudan Asahelian zone of north. Nig J Basic Appl Sci 189:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, van der Werf W, Bastiaans L, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz JHJ (2008) Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Res 107:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, van der Werf W, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz JHJ (2007) Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Res 103:178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

    Atique-ur-Rehman, Hakoomat Ali, Naeem Sarwar & Omer Farooq

  2. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

    Shakeel Ahmad

  3. Department of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Kamrun Nahar

  4. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Mirza Hasanuzzaman

Authors
  1. Atique-ur-Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hakoomat Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naeem Sarwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shakeel Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Omer Farooq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kamrun Nahar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mirza Hasanuzzaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atique-ur-Rehman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

    Shakeel Ahmad

  2. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Mirza Hasanuzzaman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Atique-ur-Rehman et al. (2020). Cotton-Based Intercropping Systems. In: Ahmad, S., Hasanuzzaman, M. (eds) Cotton Production and Uses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation