Abstract
Karl Popper argued that the scientific method was cyclic in nature; and that the growth of scientific knowledge took place when we focused on the falsification of theories, as opposed to their verification. We demonstrate here the relevance of these ideas to engineering processes and approaches, which can be seen as cyclic problem solving. The notion of failure plays a vital role, both in the design process and in the wider growth of engineering knowledge. Examples are given of real world failures and their contribution to the growth of knowledge in various aspects of engineering. We also show how some of these concepts are embodied in genetic algorithms, used for both optimization and design; and in reflective practice loops that are advocated for organizational learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
C. Alexander, Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964)
N. Anwar, Structural Design Review: Bowling and Theater Roof Truss—Central Rama III (ACECOMS, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, 1997)
A.W. Beeby, Partial safety factors for reinforcement. Struct. Eng. 72(20), 341–343 (1994)
D.I. Blockley, The Nature of Structural Design and Safety (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1980)
D.I. Blockley, Engineering from reflective practice. Res. Eng. Des. 4, 13–22 (1992)
D.I. Blockley, J.R. Henderson, Structural failures and the growth of engineering knowledge. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Part 1 68, 719–728 (1980)
BS 8110: 1997. Structural Use of Concrete (British Standards Institution, London, 1997)
S. Cammelli, Tianjin CTF financial centre: wind, form and structure. Struct. Eng. 96(9), 14–21 (2018)
P. Checkland, J. Scholes, Soft Systems Methodology in Action (Wiley, Chichester, 1990)
S. Conway Morris, Darwin’s compass: how evolution discovers the song of creation (The Boyle Lecture 2005). Sci. Christ. Belief 18(1), 5–22 (2006)
R. Corvi, An Introduction to the Thought of Karl Popper (Routledge, London, 1997)
R.D. Coyne, M.A. Rosenman, A.D. Radford, M. Balachandran, J.S. Gero, Knowledge Based Design Systems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1990)
CP 110: 1972. The Structural Use of Concrete (British Standards Institution, London, 1972)
R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (Longman, London, 1986)
N.J. Delatte, Beyond Failure: Forensic Case Studies for Civil Engineers (ASCE Press, Reston, 2009)
W.P.S. Dias, Structural failures and design philosophy. Struct. Eng. 72(2), 25–29 (1994)
W.P.S. Dias, Reflective practice, artificial intelligence and engineering design: common trends and inter-relationships. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. (AIEDAM) 16, 261–271 (2002)
W.P.S. Dias, Engineering as cyclic problem solving—some insights from Karl Popper. Struct. Eng. 85(2), 32–37 (2007)
P. Dias, The disciplines of engineering and history: some common ground. Sci. Eng. Ethics 20(2), 539–549 (2014)
W.P.S. Dias, D.I. Blockley, Discussion on “Galileo’s confirmation of a false hypothesis: a paradigm of logical error in design by Henry Petroski”. Civ. Eng. Syst. 11, 75–77 (1994)
W.P.S. Dias, D.I. Blockley, Reflective practice in engineering design. ICE Proc. Civ. Eng. 108(4), 160–168 (1995)
W.P.S. Dias, U.A. Padukka, AI techniques for preliminary design decisions on column spacing and sizing. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on the application of artificial intelligence to civil, structural and environmental engineering, Rome, 30 Aug–2 Sep 2005 (2005)
W.P.S. Dias, A.D.C. Jayanandana, M.C.M. Fonseka, A.A.D.A.J. Perera, Distress in prestressed concrete roof girders at cement plant. ASCE J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 8(1), 6–15 (1994)
P. Dias, R. Dissanayake, R. Chandratilake, Lessons learned from tsunami damage in Sri Lanka. ICE Proc. Civ. Eng. 159, 74–81 (2006)
P. Feyerabend, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (New Left Books, London, 1975)
D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimisation and Machine Learning (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1989)
J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975)
I. Hybs, J.S. Gero, An evolutionary process model of design. Des. Stud. 13(3), 273–290 (1992)
W.M. Jenkins, Structural optimization with the genetic algorithm. Struct. Eng. 69(24), 418–422 (1991)
J. LeMasurier, D.I. Blockley, D. Muir Wood, An observational model for managing risk. ICE Proc. Civ. Eng. 159(6), 35–40 (2006)
M. Levy, M. Salvadori, Why Buildings Fall Down (W.W. Norton & Co., New York, 1992)
P. Lipton, The truth about science (The Medawar Lecture 2004). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360, 1259–1269 (2005)
I.A. MacLeod, A strategy for the use of computers in structural engineering. Struct. Eng. 73(21), 366–370 (1995)
B. Magee, Popper (Fontana, London, 1973)
M.A. Notturno, Science and the Open Society: The Future of Karl Popper’s Philosophy (Central European University Press, Budapest, 2000)
H. Petroski, To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1969)
H. Petroski, Galileo’s confirmation of a false hypothesis: a paradigm of logical error in design. Civ. Eng. Syst. 9(3), 251–263 (1992)
H. Petroski, Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)
N.F. Pidgeon, D.I. Blockley, B.A. Turner, Design practice and snow loading—lessons from a roof collapse. Struct. Eng. 64A(3), 67–71 (1986)
K.R. Popper, The Poverty of Historicism, 2nd edn. (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1960)
K.R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd edn. (Hutchison, London, 1968)
K.R. Popper, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972)
K.R. Popper, in Realism and the Aim of Science: Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, vol. 1, ed. by W.W. Bartley III (Hutchison, London, 1983)
K.R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 5th edn. (Routledge, London, 1989)
K.R. Popper, All Life is Problem Solving (Routledge, London, 1999)
M.A. Rosenman, An exploration into evolutionary models for non-routine design. Artif. Intell. Eng. 11, 287–293 (1997)
D.A. Schon, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Temple Smith, London, 1983)
P.M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Century Business, New York, 1992)
P.G. Sibly, A.C. Walker, Structural accidents and their causes. Proc., Inst. Civ. Eng., Part 1 62, 191–208 (1977)
Y. Umeda, H. Takeda, H. Yoshikawa, T. Tomiyama, Function, behaviour and structure, in Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V, Vol. 1—Design, ed. by J.S. Gero (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1990), pp. 177–193
W.G. Vincenti, What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, 1990)
S.B. Willoughby, The Ridgeway footbridge. Struct. Eng. 74(5), 79–83 (1996)
Acknowledgements
Adapted from The Structural Engineer 85(2), 32–37, Engineering as cyclic problem solving—some insights from Karl Popper by W. P. S. Dias, 2007, published by the Institution of Structural Engineers, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dias, P. (2019). Are Failures the Pillars of Success?. In: Philosophy for Engineering. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1271-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1271-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1270-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1271-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)