Skip to main content

Impacts of Resource Consumption and Waste Generation on Environment and Subsequent Effects on Human Health: A Study Based on Ecological Footprint Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Health Risk and Resilience in Asian Cities

Abstract

In this study, the carbon emission and ecological footprint (EF) from resource consumption and waste generation in Tangail municipal area (TMA) of Bangladesh were estimated, and the ecological sustainability status of the area was also assessed by calculating biocapacity. Data were collected from 180 households covering 18 wards of the TMA. Households, 10 from each ward, were selected considering different income groups and a questionnaire survey was conducted to gather information about their monthly consumption patterns of energy, food, water, goods, and services along with waste generation for the year 2016. The calculated total carbon emission from different carbon uptake factor was 433,235.302 tons CO2, while the highest (271,451.471 tons CO2) carbon emission was derived from natural gas consumption and the lowest (380.083 tons CO2) was observed from water consumption. Carbon uptake land was the major combined sector contributing to total EF (51.79%), whereas cropland was found as the single sector contributing to high footprint figure (47.13%) in TMA. The study found that the EF increases not only with resource consumption and waste generation, but also with household size (p < 0.01) and income (p < 0.01). Total EF and biocapacity of the area were found as 2.21 and 0.08 gha/capita, respectively, while the ecological deficit was estimated as 2.13 gha/capita which may have both direct and indirect impacts on human health. The study concluded that EF of TMA exceeds its biocapacity by almost twenty-eight (28) times. The study recommended to set annual targets, to reduce EF at household levels by awaking people about how much they are consuming, its environmental impacts and subsequent effects on their health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asaduzzaman M (2002) Frontiers of change in rural Bangladesh: natural resources and sustainable livelihoods. In: Hands not land: how livelihoods are changing in rural Bangladesh, Department for International Development (DFID), Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagliani M, Galli A, Niccolucci V, Marchettini N (2008) Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: the case of the Province of Siena Italy. Environ Manag 86:354–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala BK, Hossain MA (2010) Food security and ecological foot print of the coastal zone of Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain 12:531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala BK, Hossain MA, Haque MA, Majumder S (2012) Ecological footprint of the hill tracts of Chittagong in Bangladesh. Oecol Mont 21:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Ind 24:518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BPDB (Bangladesh Power Development Board) (2015) Tariff rate. Bangladesh Power Development Board. http://bd.bpdb.gov.bd/download/tariff/Tariff%20order.retail_9.1.2015.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017

  • Byomkesh T, Nakagoshi N, Shahedur RM (2009) State and management of wetlands in Bangladesh. Landsc Ecol Eng 5:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Lendrum D, Manga L, Bagayoko M, Sommerfeld J (2015) Climate change and vector-borne diseases: what are the implications for public health research and policy? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 370(1665):20130552. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers N, Child R, Jenkin N, Lewis K, Vergoulas G, Whiteley M (2005) Stepping forward: a resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of the south west of England. Technical report, The Stepping Forward Report Series, Best Food Forward Limited, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen GQ (2006) Ecological footprint ac-counting based on energy—a case study of the Chinese society. Ecol Model 198:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero E, Todd AM, Abellerra D (2008) Climate change education and the ecological footprint. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 865–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Creative Research System (2010) Sample size calculator. The survey system. http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. Accessed 23 Oct 2016

  • Ebi KL, Mills DM, Smith JB, Grambsch A (2006) Climate change and human health impacts in the United States: an update on the results of the US national assessment. Environ Health Perspect 114(9):1318–1324. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing B, Moore D, Goldfinger A, Oursler A, Reed A, Wackernagel M (2010a) Ecological footprint atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing B, Reed A, Galli A, Kitzes J, Wackernagel M (2010b) Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts, 2010th edn. Glob Footpr Netw, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon, and water footprint into a “Footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Ind 16:100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2010) Ecological footprint and biocapacity, 2007. Based on National Footprint Accounts, 2010 edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Design Institute (2011) GHG emissions: the economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution to Working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ (2008) On the causal link between carbon dioxide and air pollution mortality. Geophys Res Lett 35(3):L038809. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzes J, Peller A, Goldfinger S, Wackernagel M (2007) Current methods for calculating national ecological footprint accounts. Shiga Univ Environ Res Cent Annu Rep 4(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Master Plan for Tangail Paurashava (2013) Preparation of master plan for Tangail paurashava: structural plan, urban area plan and ward action plan (2013–2033), Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Medved S (2006) Present and future ecological footprint of Slovenia—the influence of energy demand scenarios. Ecol Model 192:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D (2004) Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessment. Land Use Policy 21:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers SS, Gaffikin L, Golden CD, Ostfeld RS, Redford KH, Ricketts TH, Turner WR, Osofsky SA (2013) Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(47):18753–18760. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218656110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci V, Gall A, Kitzes J, Pulselli RM, Bor-sa S, Marchettini N (2008) Ecological footprint analysis applied to the production of two Italian wines. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:162–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Huang X, Cordova A, Pimentel M (2006) Impact of a growing population on natural resources: The challenge for environmental management. Front: Interdiscipl J Study Abroad 13:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Portier CJ, Thigpen TK, Carter SR, Dilworth CH, Grambsch AE, Gohlke J, Hess J, Howard SN, Luber G, Lutz JT, Maslak T, Prudent N, Radtke M, Rosenthal JP, Rowles T, Sandifer PA, Scheraga J, Schramm PJ, Strickman D, Trtanj JM, Whung PY (2010) A human health perspective on climate change: a report outlining the research needs on the human health effects of climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002272, www.niehs.nih.gov/climatereport

  • Quam VGM, Rocklov J, Quam MBM, Lucas RAI (2017) Assessing greenhouse gas emissions and health co-benefits: a structured review of lifestyle-related climate change mitigation strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Rahman MM, Tanu TA, Rahman MM (2012) Spatial environmental impact on land degradation in Bangladesh. Asian J Appl Sci Eng 1(2):84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker BC, Shutradhar SC, Khan A, Saifullah ASM, Ruma AB (2015) Urban growth and its impact on Tangail municipal area. J Environ Sci Nat Resour 8(2):163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakil SH, Kuhu NN, Rahman Z, Islam I (2014) Carbon emission from domestic level consumption: ecological footprint account of Dhanmondi residential area, Dhaka, Bangladesh—a case study. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 8(7):265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons C, Lewis K, Barrett J (2000) Two feet-two approaches: a component based model of ecological footprinting. Ecol Econ 32(3):375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers S (2011) Calculating the carbon footprint of universities. Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • The Engineering Toolbox (2001) Natural gas consumption. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/natural-gas-consumption-d_172.html. Accessed 08 Nov 2016

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2011) Greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energyresources/calculator.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2016

  • Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz NB, Erb KH, Haberl H, Krausmann F (2004) Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy 21:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the officials of Tangail municipal authority, Bangladesh, for providing us necessary data and extending their cooperation throughout the study period.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanmoy Roy Tusher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tusher, T.R., Pondit, T., Hasan, M., Latif, M.B., Binyamin, M. (2020). Impacts of Resource Consumption and Waste Generation on Environment and Subsequent Effects on Human Health: A Study Based on Ecological Footprint Analysis. In: Singh, R., Srinagesh, B., Anand, S. (eds) Urban Health Risk and Resilience in Asian Cities. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1205-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics