Abstract
Currently, any student studying biology knows the name of Lynn Margulis. The endosymbiotic theory is illustrated in a visually comprehensible way in any textbook, and nobody doubts about its truth. Even in the first half of the twentieth century, a limited number of biologists argued already about endosymbiotic hypotheses. However, in 1967, in which Margulis published her initial paper on the origin of mitosis, this was not a generally accepted theory. Why did Margulis propose her endosymbiotic theory as an original one? We have to re-examine her discourses in her initial writings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Journal articles and books are listed according to the year of publication. Within a year, they are sorted in the alphabetical order of the author(s). Note that the references described in the citations are not listed here.
- 2.
Japanese references are cited in the main text with “J” after the year, such as Kato (1973J). The title of each article was translated by the author, if English title is not provided in the original publications. A short comment or explanation is added for each publication, if necessary.
References
Journal articles and books are listed according to the year of publication. Within a year, they are sorted in the alphabetical order of the author(s). Note that the references described in the citations are not listed here.
Publications in English, German, French and Russian
Mereschkowsky C (1910) Theorie der zwei Plasmaarten als Grundlage der Symbiogenesis, einer neuen Lehre von der Entstehung der Organismen. Biol Zentralblatt 30:278–288, 289-303,321-347,353-367
Minchin EA (1915) The evolution of the cell. Report of the Eighty-Fifth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, September 7–11, 437–464. Reproduced in American Naturalist 50(1916), 3–38, 106–118, 271–283
Mérejkovsky C (1920) La plante considérée comme un complexe symbiotique. Bull Soc Sci Nat Ouest France 6:17–98
Wilson EB (1925) The Cell in Development and Heredity. 3rd edition. Macmillan, New York
Wallin JE (1927) Symbionticism and the Origin of Species. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Haldane JBS (1929) The origin of life. The Rationalist Annual 3, 3–10 (page number is uncertain). Downloadable from http://www.uv.es/~orilife/englishindex.htm
Lederberg J (1952) Cell genetics and hereditary symbiosis. Physiol Rev 32:403–430
Ris H, Plaut W (1962) Ultrastructure of DNA-containing areas in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas. J Cell Biol 13:383–391
Gibor A, Granick S (1964) Plastids and mitochondria: inheritable systems. Science 145:890–897
Sagan L et al (1965) Studies on chloroplast development in Euglena. XI. Radioautographic localization of chloroplast DNA. Plant Physiol 40:1257–1260
Echlin P (1966) The cyanophytic origin of higher plant chloroplasts. Br phycol Bull 3:150–151
Bernal JD (1967) The Origin of Life. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
Sagan (Margulis) L (1967) On the origin of mitosing cells. J Theor Biol 14:225–274
Pickett-Heaps JD (1969) The evolution of the mitotic apparatus: an attempt at comparative ultrastructural cytology in dividing plant cells. Cytobios 3:257–280
Margulis L (1970) Origin of Eukaryotic Cells. Evidence and Research Implications for a Theory of the Origin and Evolution of Microbial, Plant, and Animal Cells on the Precambrian Earth. Yale University Press, New Haven
Monod J (1970) Le hasard et la nécessité. Seuil, Paris
Margulis L (1971) Symbiosis and Evolution. Sci Amer 225:48–57
Takhtajan AL (1973) Four kingdoms of the living world [in Russian]. Priroda (Nature) 2:22–32. Russian original: А. Л. Тахтаджян: Четыре царства органического мира. природа.
Margulis L (1975) Symbiotic theory of the origin of eukaryotic organelles: criteria for proof. Symp Soc Exp Biol 29:21–38
Margulis L (1981/1993) Symbiosis in Cell Evolution. 2nd Ed. Microbial Communities in the Archean and Proteozoic Eons. Freeman, San Francisco
Margulis L, Bermudes D (1985) Symbiosis as a mechanism of evolution: status of cell symbiosis theory. Symbiosis 1:101–124
Hall JL et al (1989) Basal body/centriolar DNA: Molecular genetic studies in Chlamydomonas. Cell 59:121–132
Johnson KA, Rosenbaum JL (1991) Basal bodies and DNA. Trends Cell Sci 1:145–149
Brinkley W (1997) Microtubules: a brief historical perspective. J Struct Biol 118:84–86
Margulis L (1998) Symbiotic Planet. A New Look at Evolution. Basic Books, Amherst, MA
Sato N (2012) Scientific élan vital: Entropy deficit or inhomogeneity as a unified concept of driving forces of life in hierarchical biosphere driven by photosynthesis. Entropy 14:233–251
Fu J et al (2015) The centrosome and its duplication cycle. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a015800
Boisy G et al (2016) Microtubules: 50 years on from the discovery of tubulin. Nature Review Mol Cell Biol 17:322–328
Martin WF (2017) Physiology, anaerobes, and the origin of mitosing cells 50 years on. J Theor Biol 434:2–10
Sato N (2017) Revisiting theoretical basis of the endosymbiotic origin of plastids in the original context of Lynn Margulis on the origin of mitosing, eukaryotic cells. J Theor Biol 434:104–113
Publications in Japanese
Kitagawa D (2017J) Conserved molecular mechanisms of centrosome duplication and maturation. Seikagaku Journal of Japanese Biochemical Society) 89:489–497
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sato, N. (2019). Re-evaluation of the Initial Ideas of Lynn Margulis. In: Endosymbiotic Theories of Organelles Revisited. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1161-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1161-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1160-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1161-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)